Slog: News & Arts

RSS icon Comments on Clone Burger

1

Um, no. The quality of meat isn't determined by genetics, it's determined by feed and pasture conditions.

A clone of the greatest steak in the history of the world that's finished in a typical feedlot, up to its belly in shit and mud, feeding on beef tallow and corn, is going to be just as shitty as the past-pull-date plastic-tray gunk at Walmart.

Anybody who thinks that they're going to be interested in cloning "quality" meat, as opposed to meat that can withstand rougher treatment, is living in a dream world.

Posted by Fnarf | January 4, 2008 4:10 PM
2

I just want to know if eating a cloned baby will be illegal in the year 2050. It's not like it's a REAL person or anything.

Posted by Jonah S | January 4, 2008 4:10 PM
3

Yes, will we be allowed to kill clones? Rape? All the good stuff?

Posted by Mr. Poe | January 4, 2008 4:15 PM
4

I'm not really sure why people get all worked up about cloning, whether it be people or animals. Essentially your talking about identical twins born at different times. No one has silly debates about whether twins have rights/souls/freedom or any other nonsense, so why have them about clones.

And the moment your talking about agriculture your left the realm of the natural. There are no fields of wheat, fat ass dairy cows, or most of the fruit we eat in nature.

Posted by giffy | January 4, 2008 4:21 PM
5

What do you mean? Identical twins are horrifying freaks of nature.

Posted by elenchos | January 4, 2008 4:33 PM
6

Except Tegan and Sara. Them I like.

Posted by elenchos | January 4, 2008 4:35 PM
7

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!

Sigh.

This is just wrong, as is the decision not to label cloned milk and cloned meat.

Posted by Will in Seattle | January 4, 2008 4:48 PM
8

So glad I went vegetarian.

Posted by maxine | January 4, 2008 4:48 PM
9

True, they taste better, @8.

;-)

Posted by Will in Seattle | January 4, 2008 4:49 PM
10

@8, as a vegetarian, cloning is just as relevant to our food supply as it is to everyone elses meat supply. GMO crops have been around and approved for freaking ever. So not exactly sure what your comment is trying to express.

Posted by seattle98104 | January 4, 2008 4:54 PM
11

I'd never eat cloned meat because I just don't trust people to get shit like this right, but the idea that there could be meat that didn't come from an animal, and therefore didn't result in a complex social animal -- like a pig -- being killed does sort of appeal to me in the abstract.

Posted by Judah | January 4, 2008 4:59 PM
12

@7--who's cloning milk? and just how the hell are they doing it?

Posted by Bridgette | January 4, 2008 5:01 PM
13

I guess the controversy may be over unless you've been suffering for years from one of the disorders that could have been cured but wasn't, then you might still feel a little hostile.

Anybody who is opposed to fetal stem cell research and is not in favor of closing all in vitro fertilization clinics either doesn't understand what's going on, or is a SOB who should be flogged.

Posted by mikeblanco | January 4, 2008 7:46 PM
14

How will cloned meat be cost effective exactly?

Let's see. Getting a bull to fuck a cow: pretty much free. Cloning a cow: hundreds of thousands of dollars? Millions of dollars?

That shit's going to be more expensive than Kobe beef.

Posted by keshmeshi | January 4, 2008 8:04 PM
15

11 - Cloning produces a plant or animal genetically identical to the one the cloned cell was taken from. A cloned pig is the same complex social animal as any other pig, and it would be killed to produce the meat. I'm not sure how this could be any different from making pigs the old-fashioned way.

Posted by Layna | January 5, 2008 10:00 AM

Comments Closed

In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 45 days old).