<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Slog - Comments on Clintonistas Ready For Their Date With the Washington Caucus</title>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/01/clintonistas_ready_for_their_date_with_t</link>
<description>Posted by Ryan S. Jackson &quot;It&apos;s been a great day, but this contest is going to be decided state by state by state... what happens in the Washington caucus is going to count.&quot; King County Executive Ron Sims was speaking before a group of roughly 35 Hillary Clinton supporters who had turned out for this afternoon&apos;s caucus training, held in a Machinists Union hall in the deepest regions of the South Park neighborhood. Those in attendance might have been getting over the fact that repairs to the South Park bridge had led to a twisting detour through south Seattle before...</description>
<copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 17:30:09 -0800</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 10:30:33 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<generator>http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.34</generator>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

<item>
<title>Comment by Will in Seattle</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Neat.</p>

<p>Today someone from the Obama campaign doorbelled me.</p>

<p>Choices, choices - go with the campaign that got more delegates (Obama) or go with the one that has been involved in insider politics for 35+ years (Clinton).</p>

<p>Hmm, wonder how Edwards will do?</p>]]></description>
<author>Will in Seattle</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/01/clintonistas_ready_for_their_date_with_t#c903464</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/01/clintonistas_ready_for_their_date_with_t#c903464</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 18:31:19 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by unPC</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>hey we all love Obama but we all aren't drinking the kool aid -- Here's the delegate scorecard:</p>

<p>Clinton 210, Obama 123. </p>

<p><a href="http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/primaries/results/scorecard/" rel="nofollow">http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/primaries/results/scorecard/</a></p>]]></description>
<author>unPC</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/01/clintonistas_ready_for_their_date_with_t#c903475</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/01/clintonistas_ready_for_their_date_with_t#c903475</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 18:57:26 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by karst</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>How about going with the candidate who can grab independents and doesn't poll worse than the generic democrat in polls?</p>

<p><a href="http://www.wa-democrats.org/index.php?page=display&id=245" rel="nofollow">http://www.wa-democrats.org/index.php?page=display&id=245</a></p>]]></description>
<author>karst</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/01/clintonistas_ready_for_their_date_with_t#c903478</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/01/clintonistas_ready_for_their_date_with_t#c903478</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 19:18:37 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Gitai</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>So are they training them on the same voter suppression tactics that Clinton's team used in Nevada?</p>

<p>Also, the Culinary Union's endorsement just became worthless.  If you can't deliver the votes, why bother courting you?</p>]]></description>
<author>Gitai</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/01/clintonistas_ready_for_their_date_with_t#c903479</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/01/clintonistas_ready_for_their_date_with_t#c903479</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 19:20:20 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by go clinton</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>I was there all day today. If it seemed low energy towards the end it was mainly because most of us were becoming tired after having called Nevada and Washington voters all morning... a 8 am start is early for a Saturday, but it worked! Go Clinton!  </p>]]></description>
<author>go clinton</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/01/clintonistas_ready_for_their_date_with_t#c903485</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/01/clintonistas_ready_for_their_date_with_t#c903485</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 19:29:33 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Big Sven</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>WiS@1:</p>

<p>The problem with posting essentially the same exact thing on three separate threads (as you did regarding the delegate count) is that when your comment is found to be in fact incorrect (as yours was), you look 3x less credible.</p>

<p>Better luck next time!</p>]]></description>
<author>Big Sven</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/01/clintonistas_ready_for_their_date_with_t#c903486</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/01/clintonistas_ready_for_their_date_with_t#c903486</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 19:35:52 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by watcher</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>I was there too... by the end of the day there were about 70 people there!</p>

<p>And what's with the "suppression techniques" crap?  Since when can you hold a caucus where it's most convenient for your candidate of choice?  bullshit.</p>]]></description>
<author>watcher</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/01/clintonistas_ready_for_their_date_with_t#c903487</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/01/clintonistas_ready_for_their_date_with_t#c903487</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 19:41:29 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Michigan Matt</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>@7--Watcher.  Read what went down in NV.  It's slimy and not befitting a Democrat.  Of course, seeing that the Clintons are behind it doesn't surprise me.  It's a shame, really.  </p>]]></description>
<author>Michigan Matt</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/01/clintonistas_ready_for_their_date_with_t#c903488</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/01/clintonistas_ready_for_their_date_with_t#c903488</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 19:58:46 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Big Sven</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Whoops.  Now the NV Dems are backtracking.  WiS is probably right about the count.</p>]]></description>
<author>Big Sven</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/01/clintonistas_ready_for_their_date_with_t#c903489</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/01/clintonistas_ready_for_their_date_with_t#c903489</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 19:59:55 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by karst</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, you'd <i>never</i> think a campaign with an advisor who specializes in union busting would ever have anything to do with suppressing union vote. Gosh!  </p>]]></description>
<author>karst</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/01/clintonistas_ready_for_their_date_with_t#c903492</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/01/clintonistas_ready_for_their_date_with_t#c903492</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 20:05:31 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Mike of Renton</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Of course Sen. Margarita Moneytree was there.  Corrupt minds think alike.</p>]]></description>
<author>Mike of Renton</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/01/clintonistas_ready_for_their_date_with_t#c903496</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/01/clintonistas_ready_for_their_date_with_t#c903496</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 20:24:53 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by eclexia</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>As far as I know, "Clintonista" was a term invented by Dick Morris about 8 years back.  It's used by people who believe every trumped-up rumor about the Clintons, from Whitewater to gun-running.  It doesn't really make me happy to see it here.</p>]]></description>
<author>eclexia</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/01/clintonistas_ready_for_their_date_with_t#c903501</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/01/clintonistas_ready_for_their_date_with_t#c903501</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 20:42:00 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Anon</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>@3 Did you mean to link to the <a href="http://www.wa-democrats.org/index.php?page=display&id=248" rel="nofollow">straw poll results</a>?</p>]]></description>
<author>Anon</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/01/clintonistas_ready_for_their_date_with_t#c903502</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/01/clintonistas_ready_for_their_date_with_t#c903502</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 20:47:17 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by unPC</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>The spin is amazing. </p>

<p>Going to court -- to ask a judge if the voting system violates your rights -- is now "voter suppression techniques." </p>

<p>What sanctimonious bullshit.  </p>

<p><br />
</p>]]></description>
<author>unPC</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/01/clintonistas_ready_for_their_date_with_t#c903503</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/01/clintonistas_ready_for_their_date_with_t#c903503</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 20:48:51 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by annie</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Nobody at my caucus site better try to pull that "present votes" bullshit. Lame! Maybe I'll photocopy and highlight this <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/20/us/politics/20obama.html" rel="nofollow">New York Times article</a> just in case.</p>]]></description>
<author>annie</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/01/clintonistas_ready_for_their_date_with_t#c903504</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/01/clintonistas_ready_for_their_date_with_t#c903504</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 20:53:36 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Mike of Renton</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>@14  </p>

<p>So filing a lawsuit is now "asking a judge"?  Pot and kettle.</p>]]></description>
<author>Mike of Renton</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/01/clintonistas_ready_for_their_date_with_t#c903505</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/01/clintonistas_ready_for_their_date_with_t#c903505</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 20:54:57 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Mike of Renton</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Annie, I think the "present" votes bs might be the least of the <a href="http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/1/19/162953/644/790/439573" rel="nofollow"> problems</a>.</p>]]></description>
<author>Mike of Renton</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/01/clintonistas_ready_for_their_date_with_t#c903507</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/01/clintonistas_ready_for_their_date_with_t#c903507</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 20:58:54 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Will in Fremont</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>According to CNN's main website, Obama has 2 more delegates than Clinton on a national level.</p>

<p>Booyaa!</p>

<p>Don't bring a knife to a gunfight.</p>]]></description>
<author>Will in Fremont</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/01/clintonistas_ready_for_their_date_with_t#c903520</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/01/clintonistas_ready_for_their_date_with_t#c903520</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 21:46:39 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Will is an Idiot</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Total Delegates:<br />
Clinton 210<br />
Obama 123</p>]]></description>
<author>Will is an Idiot</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/01/clintonistas_ready_for_their_date_with_t#c903526</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/01/clintonistas_ready_for_their_date_with_t#c903526</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 22:18:31 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Big Sven</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!!!</p>

<p>What a bunch of fuckin' crybabies.  I guarantee you, we Clinton supporters won't be such touchy grumpy douches if she loses in SC.</p>]]></description>
<author>Big Sven</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/01/clintonistas_ready_for_their_date_with_t#c903543</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/01/clintonistas_ready_for_their_date_with_t#c903543</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 23:49:24 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Big Sven</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Just to be clear: I'm not talking about annie or Will in Seattle or elenchos or any of the other sane people.  I'm talking about the kind of oversensitive under-contextuals who would, for instance, quote the dailykos blog of a paranoid Obama supporter.</p>]]></description>
<author>Big Sven</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/01/clintonistas_ready_for_their_date_with_t#c903544</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/01/clintonistas_ready_for_their_date_with_t#c903544</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 23:51:55 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by I heart Big Sven</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Nice one Sven... </p>

<p>What is with Obama supporters and their inability to lose gracefully?</p>

<p>If you keep thinking you are winning, you'll continue to lose. </p>]]></description>
<author>I heart Big Sven</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/01/clintonistas_ready_for_their_date_with_t#c903586</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/01/clintonistas_ready_for_their_date_with_t#c903586</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 09:44:35 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Shawn Fassett</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Hey Annie, maybe you should take a look at this snappy NY Times article (since you are so fond of "facts"). </p>

<p><a href="http://politics.nytimes.com/election-guide/2008/results/vote-polls/NH.html" rel="nofollow">http://politics.nytimes.com/election-guide/2008/results/vote-polls/NH.html</a></p>

<p>People that support people THINK they are actually voting for Bill Clinton (the return.)</p>

<p>I wish I could find an older poll (from the fall) that asked GOP voters who they supported and Obama placed 3rd or 4th with the GOP. If the Democrats are going to clearly win (remember there are more Katherine Harris & Ken Blackwell's out there), we will need the independents and Republicans that Obama will pull in. Clinton will NEVER have the support of the GOP base. </p>]]></description>
<author>Shawn Fassett</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/01/clintonistas_ready_for_their_date_with_t#c903662</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/01/clintonistas_ready_for_their_date_with_t#c903662</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 14:08:33 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by michael strangeways</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Yes, Jim Kainber is "buoyant".</p>

<p>(Hi, Jim, if you're reading this...)</p>]]></description>
<author>michael strangeways</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/01/clintonistas_ready_for_their_date_with_t#c903893</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/01/clintonistas_ready_for_their_date_with_t#c903893</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 10:30:33 -0800</pubDate>
</item>


</channel>
</rss>
