<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Slog - Comments on The OPA Alternative</title>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/01/better_living_through_lawyering</link>
<description>According to a report from the Office of Professional Accountability (OPA), the OPA sustained a surprising number of complaints against police officers last month. Complaints against officers who were busted for driving drunk and an officer who used a police vehicle for personal use were sustained, as was a complaint against a cop who was cited for obstruction, and dinged for being discourteous to another officer. Two other officers were also reprimanded for keeping a man in custody after they had determined he was not the suspect in an assault. In addition to the sustained complaints, other officers were given...</description>
<copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 21:39:26 -0800</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:10:54 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<generator>http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.34</generator>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

<item>
<title>Comment by Packratt</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for keeping at it Jonah.</p>

<p>I truly appreciate your coverage of police accountability issues, for whatever that's worth.</p>

<p>I truly wish Hays and Lujan more luck than I've had trying to hold the city to account for not keeping their police officers accountable.</p>]]></description>
<author>Packratt</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/01/better_living_through_lawyering#c894131</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/01/better_living_through_lawyering#c894131</guid>
<category>City</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 22:50:16 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Gitai</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Question: Does the city indemnify officers against lawsuits for their professional actions if the complaints are not sustained?  How about if they are sustained?</p>

<p>It seems to me that if officers went broke for excessive force, they'd be a bit less inclined to to use it.</p>]]></description>
<author>Gitai</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/01/better_living_through_lawyering#c894133</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/01/better_living_through_lawyering#c894133</guid>
<category>City</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 22:53:00 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Packratt</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Gitai,</p>

<p>A few years ago officers and the SPOG started using defemation countersuits as part of an effort to stop all the brutality lawsuits from flowing. It worked fairly well because not only were they suing the victims, but also their lawyers.</p>

<p>I would imagine that if the SPD and city stopped protecting their officers from personal liability for misconduct, that the countersuits would start up again in earnest. (if they're not going to soon anyway).</p>

<p>Of course... It's not that me or my opinion on anything is worth shit in Seattle, but that's how I've read it.</p>]]></description>
<author>Packratt</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/01/better_living_through_lawyering#c894159</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/01/better_living_through_lawyering#c894159</guid>
<category>City</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 23:10:50 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Packratt</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Hey Jonah,</p>

<p>Not that you or anyone else in Seattle pays attention to a brain-damaged dumbfuck like me, but is the OPA report available online yet?</p>

<p>I checked the usual site and it's not there.</p>]]></description>
<author>Packratt</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/01/better_living_through_lawyering#c894163</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/01/better_living_through_lawyering#c894163</guid>
<category>City</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 23:14:21 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Jonah S</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Hey Packratt,</p>

<p>here's the link:<br />
<a href="http://www.seattle.gov/mayor/issues/pdf/opa_octNov2007_commendation.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.seattle.gov/mayor/issues/pdf/opa_octNov2007_commendation.pdf</a></p>

<p>hopefully our slog-bot doesn't delete my linkage.</p>]]></description>
<author>Jonah S</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/01/better_living_through_lawyering#c894166</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/01/better_living_through_lawyering#c894166</guid>
<category>City</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 23:16:45 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Dave Coffman</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>In my only dealing with the OPA involving an officer that was a complete ass, they kept pressure up on me to "dismiss" my complaint... to the point that I finally did do it. </p>

<p>I agree.  Litigation against the a-hole factor may be the only way to go in Seattle.  95% of the police are great people.  The remaining 5% are power leaches that figure they get their jollies out of abusing the system.</p>]]></description>
<author>Dave Coffman</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/01/better_living_through_lawyering#c894180</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/01/better_living_through_lawyering#c894180</guid>
<category>City</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 23:23:18 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Gitai</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>@3 Sigh.  Okay, that says to me that we need to choose the right people to sue if they try this strategy again.  You get people who at least have a renter's policy that comes with $1 million in liability, and then the insurance company's lawyers come in too.  They're a match for the Guild.  Finally, you hit the Guild for filing SLAPP suits.  Perhaps you could even find evidence of collusion between the Guild and officers who have a history of excessive force and get a RICO suit against the Guild.  That would be sweet.</p>]]></description>
<author>Gitai</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/01/better_living_through_lawyering#c894182</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/01/better_living_through_lawyering#c894182</guid>
<category>City</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 23:26:25 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by laterite</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Anyone who thinks Seattle doesn't have political corruption has clearly never followed our law enforcement agencies.</p>]]></description>
<author>laterite</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/01/better_living_through_lawyering#c894195</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/01/better_living_through_lawyering#c894195</guid>
<category>City</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 23:34:56 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Packratt</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>@5</p>

<p>Ah, thanks, I was thinking you meant the report for December cases, my mistake. Like I said, I'm just a dummy.</p>]]></description>
<author>Packratt</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/01/better_living_through_lawyering#c894198</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/01/better_living_through_lawyering#c894198</guid>
<category>City</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 23:38:52 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Packratt</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>@7</p>

<p>You're pretty sharp, Gitai, good thinking!</p>]]></description>
<author>Packratt</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/01/better_living_through_lawyering#c894212</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/01/better_living_through_lawyering#c894212</guid>
<category>City</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 23:48:40 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by K X One</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p></p>

<p>It doesn't matter, it'll still be business as usual. Cops do whatever the fuck they want and let the courts sort it out later. It's disgusting that we pay them to ostensibly protect us.</p>]]></description>
<author>K X One</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/01/better_living_through_lawyering#c895176</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/01/better_living_through_lawyering#c895176</guid>
<category>City</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:10:54 -0800</pubDate>
</item>


</channel>
</rss>
