Not exactly the brain trust in that house.

"Don't you touch my gas, my guns or my pit bulls! Because I have a RIGHT to contribute to global warming (the end of the world), I have a RIGHT to brandish a weapon (when I feel like it), and I have a RIGHT to own dogs powerful enough to RIP your face off."

These are the very Americans that threaten the continued existence of the United States of America.

Disagree with someone's personal politics--fine. I don't like Ron Paul. I actually like the pit bulls I know personally--though I sometimes fear unfamiliar pit bulls around my dog.



It doesn't matter--these folks don't deserve to have their privacy invaded.


Take the photo down. I'd be pissed if someone took a picture of my home and used it to mock me in a hostile public forum.

Do Do Do Do Do Do Do.

Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do.

just seems a little bit elitist. and no, i am not a ron paul supporter.

Good stuff. Can we see more?

Ron Paul's plan is to fill his blimp full of pitbulls and crash it into the Superbowl!

Hypocrisy FTW!

Dominic: your cultural assumptions are dubious.

Meanwhile that Obama's minister dude in Chicago said Bill Clinton "did to 'us' what he did to Monica Lewinski."

Smart move. Obvious reference to royal flush as NV caucuses approach (playing the race card, the sex card, the young intern card, the Bill card, and the blow job card, in one fell swoop!).

1) if you can afford the gas required to drive a big truck, it is your right to do so.

2) the right to bear arms is guaranteed in the constitution. are you farmiliar with that "piece of paper" mr. self proclaimed american?

3) the assumption that all pit bulls are dangerous animals that will "rip your face off" is further evidence of your ignorance. i would bet that mr. "pissed off" thinks it is ok when our military leaders use dogs to do this to people. that is, as long as it is done to other people, on the other side of the world that terrify him.

this guy isn't pissed off, he is scared.

Background on David Rockefeller's private thinktank, the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR)
http://www.infowars.com/articles/nwo/cfr_stacks_deck_with_dem_gop_presidential_candidates.htm

and

Dick Cheney (ex-director of CFR) talks to David Rockefeller (short video)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BbnpN07J_zg

Democrat CFR member Candidates:
Barack Obama (also, Michelle Obama is on the Board of Directors in the Chicago branch of the CFR)
Hillary Clinton
John Edwards
Chris Dodd
Bill Richardson

Republican CFR member Candidates:
Mitt Romney
Rudy Giuliani
John McCain
Fred Thompson
Newt Gingrich
Mike Huckabee (not a CFR member, though he named Richard Haas, president of the CFR, as his adviser on foreign policy)

Background on David Rockefeller's private thinktank, the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR)
http://www.infowars.com/articles/nwo/cfr_stacks_deck_with_dem_gop_presidential_candidates.htm

and

Dick Cheney (ex-director of CFR) talks to David Rockefeller (short video)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BbnpN07J_zg

Democrat CFR member Candidates:
Barack Obama (also, Michelle Obama is on the Board of Directors in the Chicago branch of the CFR)
Hillary Clinton
John Edwards
Chris Dodd
Bill Richardson

Republican CFR member Candidates:
Mitt Romney
Rudy Giuliani
John McCain
Fred Thompson
Newt Gingrich
Mike Huckabee (not a CFR member, though he named Richard Haas, president of the CFR, as his adviser on foreign policy)

Besides, why should republicans own all the guns? I'm liberal AND armed.

The scary thing is, I'm sure they *do* know about those newsletters and yet they still post those signs. The remaining Ron Paul supporters have either rationalized away any notion that Ron Paul is racist, or his top stop is racist. Of course, maybe they themselves are racict.

The true test of these people would be to print out the newsletters and put them on the door of his persons neighbors. I've long been wanting to distribute his newsletters to Ron Paul supporters and tuck them under their windshields. Up here on Capitol Hill, I'd print the Andy Roony one but over in the CD, I'd print some of the MLK ones.

Damn hicks.

Elitist assumptions ARE being made.

When are you bigots going to get it?

So if you want to claim privacy, you have to make some reasonable effort to keep a low profile. But if you want to wade into the political debate, expect to have your feelings hurt.

"The most powerful clique in these (CFR) groups have one objective in common: they want to bring about the surrender of the sovereignty and the national independence of the U.S. They want to end national boundaries and racial and ethnic loyalties supposedly to increase business and ensure world peace. What they strive for would inevitably lead to dictatorship and loss of freedoms by the people. The CFR was founded for "the purpose of promoting disarmament and submergence of U.S. sovereignty and national independence into an all-powerful one-world government." Harpers, July l958

"This present window of opportunity, during which a truly peaceful and interdependent world order might be built, will not be open for too long - We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order."
-David Rockefeller speaking at the UN, Sept. 14, 1994

"We are grateful to The Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years. But, the work is now much more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national autodetermination practiced in past centuries." -- David Rockefeller, founder of the Trilateral Commission, in an address to a meeting of The Trilateral Commission, in June, 1991.

1973, August 10: The New York Times publishes "From a China Traveller" by David Rockefeller, who writes about Communist China: "One is impressed immediately by the sense of national harmony....There is a very real and pervasive dedication to chairman Mao and Maoist principles. Whatever the price of the Chinese Revolution, it has obviously succeeded not only in producing more efficient and dedicated administration, but also in fostering high morale and community purpose. General social and economic progress is no less impressive....The enormous social advances of China have benefited greatly from the singleness of ideology and purpose....The social experiment in China under Chairman Mao's leadership is one of the most important and successful in history."

1974 - Richard N. Gardner writing in Foreign Affairs (CFR's publication) April 1974 Article entitled The Hard Road to World Order, "In short, the "house of world order: will have to be built from the bottom up rather than from the top down. It will look like a great "booming, buzzing confusion," .......but an end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece, will accomplish much more than the old-fashioned frontal assault."

"We are not going to achieve a new world order without paying for it in blood as well as in words and money." Arthur Schlesinger, Jr., in Foreign Affairs (CFR publication) (July/August 1995)

"Today, America would be outraged if U.N. troops entered Los Angeles to restore order [referring to the 1991 LA Riot]. Tomorrow they will be grateful! This is especially true if they were told that there were an outside threat from beyond, whether real or promulgated, that threatened our very existence. It is then that all peoples of the world will plead to deliver them from this evil. The one thing every man fears is the unknown. When presented with this scenario, individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well-being granted to them by the World Government." Dr. Henry Kissinger, Bilderberger Conference, Evians, France, 1991

MJ @ 39) Your analogy is absurd. There simply aren't bands of Slog readers protesting or shooting at the homes of Ron Paul supporters or Pit Bull owners; there are, however, violent pro-life activists willing to murder their political opponents. Get real.