Slog: News & Arts

RSS icon Comments on McCain Mania Strikes New Hampshire

1

Alan who???

Posted by Frodo Lives! | December 21, 2007 4:06 PM
2

We get the nun's brains. He'll have to fight us for those!

Posted by Neuropatholocial Alzheimers Researchers | December 21, 2007 4:28 PM
3

McCain is surging because he's visibly sane, unlike Giuliani or Huckabee, and visibly not a lying sack of shit like Romney. Yes, he's wrong on Iraq, but these are Republicans we're talking about, not Democrats. He's intelligent, and he's got reasonably sensible Republican views on immigration, torture, religion, and the economy.

He's also straightforward and refuses to pander (by the standards of Presidential politics, at least) even when he's going again the grain of the polls. He's trustworthy, which is more important to thinking Republicans than any specific issue.

He's a formidable opponent. I think he'd cream Clinton head to head, unless he drops dead.

Posted by Fnarf | December 21, 2007 5:12 PM
4

you guys should do a republican poll for fun.

Posted by Cale | December 21, 2007 6:37 PM
5

A Keyes/Obama presidential race would be my wet dream. I would read the headline and jizz in my pants, and when my ballot came, I would too. Not only would it be a historical race between two black men for the presidency, it would guarantee that Democrats would have a lock on the White House for eight years, and also be THE most entertaining race in history:

Obama: "I have hope to bring America together!"

Keyes: "My opponent is a filthy sodomite who will use your tax money to hire fascists who will make you have sex with gay donkeys in church! He will burn in hell forever!"

It's a bit of hyperbole, but when he ran against Obama for Senate, he said that Jesus wouldn't vote for him, and refused the normal congratulatory call to Obama, saying that it would violate his integrity to congratulate a politician he thought had the wrong views.

Posted by Gitai | December 21, 2007 7:41 PM
6

So did the entire staff of The Stranger take the rest of the month off or what?
BTW, Fnarf, you are bang on about McCain. Hell, if it weren't for his position on Iraq, I would be tempted to say he's the best man - er, person - for the job.

Posted by Fifty-Two-Eighty | December 21, 2007 8:37 PM
7

@5
Obama versus Huckabee would be almost as good.

Posted by Aexia | December 21, 2007 8:44 PM
8

He's not the best man, because he's a Republican. You're not voting for a man or woman; you're voting for a team of thousands. The Republican could be the finest human being in the history of the world, and he's still going to pack the Supreme Court with right-wing douchebags and so on.

Posted by Fnarf | December 21, 2007 9:48 PM
9

well at least he's not COMPLETELY bat shit crazy like huckabee and romney.

Posted by Cale | December 21, 2007 10:17 PM
10

Right you are, Fnarf. And after so many years of inept, inefficient, corrupt and incompetent Republicans, it's time to admit that friends don't let friends vote Republican.

After all, if you wanted small efficient government, with fiscal discipline, you're gonna vote for a Dem.

Results matter.

Posted by Will in Seattle | December 21, 2007 10:20 PM
11

McCain is definitely the GOP candidate to keep an eye on as he has the best chance to win in the general election. The evangelical morons (pardon my redundance) will vote like sheep for whoever has the letter R after their name, but McCain, unlike Huckabee, can capture the moderate Republicans and some independents. As Fnarf says, a McCain/Clinton match would be an electoral disaster and I doubt if Obama or Edwards could do much better or even as well. Don't know if McCain would veto children's health care or stem cell research like the current idiot in the Oval Office, but we would still get four and possibly eight more years of misery for the people of Iraq and the soldiers sent to serve there.

Posted by RainMan | December 22, 2007 9:00 AM
12

Why McCain can't win nomination, thus not worth eyeing:

10. Visibly sane

9. Intelligent


8. Sensible views on immigration -- already doomed him in the GOP.

7. Ditto re: torture. He's against it!!

6. religion: not a raving Christian.

5. refuses to pander (eg torture, immigration)

4. Has some person of color in his family. Adopted?? Vulnerable to Atwateresque smears.

3. Still might bwe a "maverick."

2. Says there were not enough troops in Iraq at start of war -- attacking Our Noble Preident.

1. Is favored by several Sloggers !

Posted by unPC | December 22, 2007 11:06 AM
13

Walnuts!

Posted by chi type | December 22, 2007 11:17 PM
14

Brave Republican Troll is on a smear campaign against Dan Savage today. He doesn't care about the children dying in Iraq. All he cares about is the fact that Savage supported the war at some point in the past.

My disgust cannot be overstated. When all you care about is smearing people who disagree with you while overlooking the suffering and death we are causing - and even supporting it - you are a lousy human being.

My apologies for the repeat posting. I'm hunting Troll. Big, fat, blubbering Republican Troll.

Posted by montex | December 23, 2007 1:08 PM

Comments Closed

In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 45 days old).