Slog News & Arts

Line Out

Music & Nightlife

« Meth Ads: Maybe Just Once | Please Accept Our Apologies in... »

Thursday, December 20, 2007

Not For Althusser

posted by on December 20 at 15:14 PM

althusser_01.jpg

Late last week, I finally got around to reading Althusser’s For Marx. I had not read the book because I was certain that everything I needed from the French thinker was in the collection Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays consists, which contains his masterpiece “Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses (Notes towards an Investigation).” I also had not read For Marx because I knew it pushed the absurd argument that a clean break existed between Hegel and Marx, and Ludwig Feuerbach’s Essence of Christianity and Principles of the Philosophy of the Future were used to make this break look believable. It is not sensible or productive to pull apart Hegel, Feuerbach, and Marx. And it’s even less sensible to separate early Marx (1843 Manuscripts) from late Marx (Capital). And, finally, I strongly agreed with Herbert Marcuse’s reading of the 1844 Manuscripts, which was published 1933 and offered the German thinker a good alternative to Heidegger’s Being and Time. (Marcuse saw in the 1844 Manuscripts the process by which Marx would transform Hegel into Marxism, speculative philosophy into a social science.)

But the reason why I’m bringing all of this up is simply this: I completely side with what Althusser denounces in For Marx as “vulgar Marxism.” Meaning, a Marxism that begins and ends with the economy, with the way humans transform the natural world into their own world of food, clothing, and shelter. For me, the economy determines everything. It is a vulgar view of things, but it is also a hard and good ground to stand on.

But let’s look at the human brain for a second. We know it has three levels: a lower level, a middle level, and a higher level. We know that the lowest and oldest part of the brain is completely sunk in the functions of life. The life of being is its basic work. As for consciousness, this is made possible by the most recent, highest level of the brain. Consciousness, self-reflection, thought is not first but last to arrive on the scene; and because it is last, it is the first to go when there is a life-threatening emergency. For example, if a person is drowning, he/she quickly loses consciousness because the brain is trying to save all the energy it can, and consciousness, which you do not need for life, is not cheap but a big energy consumer, a very costly mental emergence. As it is with the brain, it is with society. Culture is a late development and it is also finally determined by the conditions of life, the economy, the base, the vulgar.

To use the words of Hegel: “Seek for food and clothing first, then the Kingdom of God shall be added unto you.” This is were I begin and end any consideration of the material and immaterial objects of human culture.

RSS icon Comments

1

There's a fourth part of the brain which is singly adapted to the storage and recall of celebrity photographs. Your pre-internet philosophers were educated stupid.

Posted by nbc | December 20, 2007 3:27 PM
2

There's also a fifth part of the brain that controls selection of weather-appropriate outerwear, the goretexcortex.

Posted by nbc | December 20, 2007 3:29 PM
3

Who's Marx?

Posted by blank12357 | December 20, 2007 3:37 PM
4

My God Charles...can I hire you as an interperator when my fiance starts spouting off about his beloved french philosophers? I might have a chance of understanding something he is trying, very poorly, to express to me then.

^_^

Posted by thaumaturgistguy | December 20, 2007 3:46 PM
5

It seems to me that history has proven again and again that Marxism in the real world leads to brutality and poverty of the worst sort.

Posted by PJ | December 20, 2007 3:53 PM
6

Sixth part of the brain is all about pudding, velvet sack suits, and jacking it.

Posted by Bellevue Ave | December 20, 2007 3:53 PM
7

As opossed to capatilism pj? Slave states these days are poorer than anything ever before. The Market has not delivered salvation to the millions of slum dwelers world wide. Some of us (US, Europe, and some of Asia) are living well, but not all the subjects of capatilism.

What states did in the east was merely use Marxism as way to justify totalitarian states. Stalin was never a Marxist. I highly doubt he ever read.

Posted by SeMe | December 20, 2007 5:09 PM
8

Glad you're keeping busy!

Posted by Jim Demetre | December 20, 2007 5:20 PM
9

PJ @5, following up on SeMe @7: that's because you're confusing Marxist analysis (social science) with political structures that claim Marx. Marxist analysis of the Soviet and Chinese states is, if anything, more scathing than anything produced by western liberalism.

Posted by gnossos | December 20, 2007 5:44 PM
10

selfish

Posted by zzzz#540 | December 21, 2007 8:26 AM

Comments Closed

In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 14 days old).