Slog: News & Arts

RSS icon Comments on End Zone

1

I don't get it. Why are they upset? They WANT office towers and Wal-Mart?

Posted by Fnarf | December 18, 2007 3:06 PM
2

"Industrial wasteland"??? They moved there AFTER the industrial zoning. They could benefit from retail and industrial jobs. Not sure that any offices would move down there though....sort of far.

Posted by TheTruthHurts | December 18, 2007 3:08 PM
3

"...the new restrictions represent a downzone that would turn Georgetown into an industrial wasteland."

georgetown already is an industrial wasteland. have you ever been there? it is full of ugly and gorgeous industrial plants, pollution-filled parks, run-down homes and it is beautiful that way. quit the crying, at least their soccer field is now turf instead of dirt.

Posted by Sporting Fellow | December 18, 2007 3:09 PM
4

Taco Bell!!

Posted by Mr. Poe | December 18, 2007 3:11 PM
5

Steinbrueck realizes this is necessary to preserve real industry in Seattle and wants to add one more achievement to his legacy of preserving the city's character. Those complaining were speculating on higher property values if industry could be chased out the Georgetown area.

Posted by Johnny Rigor | December 18, 2007 3:13 PM
6

The question is which will hurt us more in the long run? Subsidizing dirty industry on land worth much more than it is being paid for or risking industrial sprawl by letting supply and demand do its thang in Georgetown?

Seems like feel-good legislation to me. Probably not worth it in the long run.

Posted by Cale | December 18, 2007 3:19 PM
7

Does this mean that Georgetown won't end up like Renton? That city looks like a bad episode of Nip/Tuck. It would make me so sad to see large scale cookie cutter architecture invade airport way. Some of my favorite Seattle buildings are along that route.

Posted by muggims | December 18, 2007 3:25 PM
8

For the record, folks. Georgetown was arguing for due process. Steinbruecks Bill contained so many unknowns (all of the Council Members admitted this to be true which is why they attached a resolution to the Bill demanding another of year of study).
This was about how issues concerning the south end of our city are treated very differently than issues concerning the north. Case in point, the re-zoning of South Lake Union took public comment for over a year. The re-zoning of South Seattle yesterday took 3 weeks.
The people of Georgetown were fighting for good public process for all of us.

Posted by CJB | December 18, 2007 3:28 PM
9

Do any Stranger writers actually go further south than Madison? And @6,unless Seatac and Boeing Field flight paths were to go away, there's very little chance that Georgetown would ever become the next Belltown. More like Burien--at best, and that's only if the Port of Seattle were to offer the same noise abatement packages that they were forced to give out to people living under the approach paths. Seems sensible to maintain viable heavy industry in this town--pays for a lot of people's groceries.

Posted by Westside forever | December 18, 2007 3:31 PM
10

@ 9, I live south of Madison.

Posted by Dominic Holden | December 18, 2007 3:32 PM
11

Mmmmmmm. Georgetown. Tomorrow is Bike Night at Smarty Pants. Yesssss. Yes, indeed.

Posted by elenchos | December 18, 2007 3:39 PM
12

Good framing, Cale. But remember that "dirty industry" is a loaded term. Another legitimate view of what the zoning protects is "a decent manufacturing and industrial-service base so that not everyone has to pull shots for a living."

And props to Mr. Feit for naming the electoral benefit to Steinbrueck. I don't think Steinbrueck is just posing, though; it reads as pretty consistent with what interests him.

But anything that helps Steinbrueck run for mayor is good. Warts and all, he's the only candidate with moxie enough to engage Nickels and his paymasters on all fronts through a long campaign. It's been a while since we've had something cool like that.

Posted by tomasyalba | December 18, 2007 3:41 PM
13

@2 says it best.

The 21st Century will usher in Green Industry, and if America is to survive, instead of go down the tubes GWB is greasing for us, we need to export it worldwide.

Georgetown can either adapt ... or not.

Posted by Will in Seattle | December 18, 2007 3:59 PM
14

Isn't Georgetown both seismically hazardous - built on incompetent soil prone to liquifaction in an earthquake - and in a lahar danger zone from Mount Rainier?

Developing that area further seems like a monumentally bad idea.

Posted by liquifaction | December 18, 2007 4:57 PM
15

What made Georgetown cool was that it WAS industrial - no need to change it.

Posted by watcher | December 18, 2007 9:08 PM
16

Steinbrueck agreed to pass Nickel's Industrial Downzone in exchange for Nickel's agreeing to Steinbrueck's Amazon.com / Vulcan and Starbucks Expansion public benefits packages.

Posted by sam_iv | December 18, 2007 9:58 PM
17

@14 - And sitting on a lot of toxic and industrial residue. Even though Sabey was very interested in having them stay, Georgetown Brewing's moving out of the Rainier Cold Storage principally because they couldn't build out on the site. Portions of the fill that the complex is on top of are still thawing from the decades of use. The whole block has been gradually sinking for years. Better hope Sabey drives some really deep piles for the foundation of the new condo complex.

And you definitely don't want to know about a near-century's worth of paint manufacture, metal plating, and other Superfund activities in the neighborhood. I love Georgetown, but don't think I'd want to do large-scale commercial development there.

Posted by Jello | December 19, 2007 12:44 PM

Comments Closed

In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 45 days old).