I think you're stretching to make a point. You cannot compare the immense impact that a high volume grocery store will have on the profile of a neighborhood, versus a small non-profit that has chosen to convert a single family dwelling into an office.
I think the issue is more that these people want to keep neighborhoods like Haller Lake and Pinehurst in-city suburbs, rather than dense urban neighborhoods like we're going to eventually need. Fighting off a development and saying that we can't afford to lose any single family housing, and then turning around and removing a single family home from the market when it suits you is the definition of NIMBYism (and yeah, I hate using that term too, but I think it fits here).
@1: The grocery store in question already exists and would simply be improved to the benefit of the neighborhood. If single-family housing is to remain sacred and inviolate, the Haller Lake hypocrites must be stopped!
Jonathan Spagenthal-Lee, I can't decide if you're from an Edward Lear poem or an Edgar Allen Poe. Anyhow, I would ask you this: why is the loss of one (1!) single family home in North Seattle the least bit notable? You should kick a rock around the south end one weekend and find an actual story.
In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 45 days old).