<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Slog - Comments on Conversations About Presidential Politics I&apos;ve Had Recently</title>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/12/conversations_about_presidential_politic</link>
<description>The guy I lift weights with has been an Obama guy since the beginning but ever since Gore failed to do what my imagination had in mind I&apos;ve been a Hillary guy. &quot;Hillary--I just feel like--I dunno--she wants it too badly,&quot; the guy I lift weights with said a couple weeks ago, and I said, &quot;But don&apos;t you want someone who wants it?&quot; And he would say, &quot;She just so establishment, she&apos;s by the book, she&apos;s too aggressive, she&apos;s annoying.&quot; And I would say, &quot;Don&apos;t you want someone who&apos;s aggressive and annoying and who know knows the book inside and...</description>
<copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 08:40:08 -0800</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 20:08:22 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<generator>http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.34</generator>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

<item>
<title>Comment by Mr. Poe</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Facts:</p>

<p>- Gore was never going to run again<br />
- Gore should never run again<br />
- Maureen Dowd has had no say in anything since 1982, when she brought that party-crashing bullshit mixtape to a party. Nobody every told her that Pink Floyd sucks.<br />
- Hillary is going to be our next President<br />
- We've never had a good President</p>

<p>Thank you.</p>]]></description>
<author>Mr. Poe</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/12/conversations_about_presidential_politic#c869983</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/12/conversations_about_presidential_politic#c869983</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 08:51:05 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Mr. Poe</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>*ever. Fuck.</p>]]></description>
<author>Mr. Poe</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/12/conversations_about_presidential_politic#c869984</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/12/conversations_about_presidential_politic#c869984</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 08:52:19 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by laterite</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>"Because I feel like Hillary has some of her husband in her."<br />
<p><br />
Doesn't this run contrary to recent rumors?</p></p>]]></description>
<author>laterite</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/12/conversations_about_presidential_politic#c869998</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/12/conversations_about_presidential_politic#c869998</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 09:13:37 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by tsm</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Met a few of my relatives today, die-hard Republicans all. They hate Hillary, but also hate Rudy. And they said they'd vote for Obama. </p>

<p>Just though I'd add that to the pile of anecdata.</p>]]></description>
<author>tsm</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/12/conversations_about_presidential_politic#c870003</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/12/conversations_about_presidential_politic#c870003</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 09:23:39 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by david in wedgwood</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Biden is Right!</p>

<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wbOa989IRYw" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wbOa989IRYw</a></p>]]></description>
<author>david in wedgwood</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/12/conversations_about_presidential_politic#c870005</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/12/conversations_about_presidential_politic#c870005</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 09:26:03 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Fnarf</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>I like both Clinton and Obama. I prefer Barack, but I'd be relatively happy with Hillary too. I do think Barack's got a better chance of winning.</p>]]></description>
<author>Fnarf</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/12/conversations_about_presidential_politic#c870013</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/12/conversations_about_presidential_politic#c870013</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 09:35:25 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Hal</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Sheep!  Ba-aaaaa...</p>]]></description>
<author>Hal</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/12/conversations_about_presidential_politic#c870031</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/12/conversations_about_presidential_politic#c870031</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 09:53:58 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Original Monique</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Obama is a moron when it comes to healthcare and foreign policy. He would make a good VP at best. Christ I hope he doesn't go head to head with Rudy or Huckabee. Dude would LOSE. </p>]]></description>
<author>Original Monique</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/12/conversations_about_presidential_politic#c870049</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/12/conversations_about_presidential_politic#c870049</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 10:07:26 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by ellarosa</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>i'm also starting to think obama doesn't have the proper chops for the job.  damn, i really liked edwards, but it's clear he doesn't have a chance.  and i stand by my prediction that clinton is going to pull a reverse-bush (as in:  be more liberal once in office than she presents herself now) if elected, so i don't despair about her winning.</p>]]></description>
<author>ellarosa</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/12/conversations_about_presidential_politic#c870064</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/12/conversations_about_presidential_politic#c870064</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 10:20:30 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Michael</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>don't trust Clinton - she would be as secretive, if not more, than Bush and  I'm tired of the legacy candidate.  It's time to move to the future and to stop fighting the meme of past hatreds.  Obama is for the future and reminds me of Lincoln.  <br />
We need to say goodbye to the boomer generation and move on.</p>]]></description>
<author>Michael</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/12/conversations_about_presidential_politic#c870072</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/12/conversations_about_presidential_politic#c870072</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 10:27:03 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Big Sven</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>I keep waiting to be impressed with Obama.  I want to like the guy.  I want to have a great black President.  But his performances in the debates have been fuckin' *terrible*.  And I can't find any policy reason to choose him over Hilary (I don't count the war- he wasn't in the Senate in '02, and their policies going forward are identical.)</p>

<p>So I am forced to agree with the "an intensely gifted child whom we are rooting for and hoping doesn’t fuck up" comment.  To that I would add a paraphrase of "Swingers"- Obama is the rated PG candidate, and Clinton is the rated R candidate.  Be the rated R candidate, baby!</p>]]></description>
<author>Big Sven</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/12/conversations_about_presidential_politic#c870082</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/12/conversations_about_presidential_politic#c870082</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 10:34:44 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Hal</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>@10:<br />
Sooooo, please answer me this:  Why's yous got Lincoln on such a pedestal?</p>]]></description>
<author>Hal</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/12/conversations_about_presidential_politic#c870083</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/12/conversations_about_presidential_politic#c870083</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 10:37:05 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by jhell</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>I think Obama's first four years of presidency would be solely to secure his second term.  I could be kidding myself, but I think Hillary is more likely to make significant changes for this country sooner.  And I do agree she will become more liberal once she gets into office.  </p>]]></description>
<author>jhell</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/12/conversations_about_presidential_politic#c870102</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/12/conversations_about_presidential_politic#c870102</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 10:50:10 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by J. Lasser</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>I find myself despising Hillary and Obama about equally. I sort of like Edwards, but seem to find myself preferring Bill Richardson. Probably because I haven't been as overexposed to him.</p>]]></description>
<author>J. Lasser</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/12/conversations_about_presidential_politic#c870142</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/12/conversations_about_presidential_politic#c870142</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 11:18:29 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Jonathan</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Of course, support on Tuesdays is all that counts.</p>

<p>I gave up supporting Obama over three incidents.  He has ambition and charisma and that's it. </p>

<p>He is plainly not driven by policy (as is Clinton) or justice (as is Edwards).  He's just a charismatic, young, ambitious guy.  Kind of like Bush -- just smarter (and black and progressive). </p>

<p>But, it strikes me, fundamentally like Bush. </p>

<p>We really don't need another Bush.  </p>]]></description>
<author>Jonathan</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/12/conversations_about_presidential_politic#c870182</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/12/conversations_about_presidential_politic#c870182</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 11:52:44 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Jonathan</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Oh the incidents were:</p>

<p>His support for ex-gay McClurkin; campaigning on "fixing" social security; and the Obama Campaign's attacks on Paul Krugman for daring to point out that Obama's healthcare plan is the worst of the main democratic contenders. </p>

<p>Yeah.  We always attack people who speak truth to power.  It inspires audacions hope.   </p>]]></description>
<author>Jonathan</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/12/conversations_about_presidential_politic#c870190</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/12/conversations_about_presidential_politic#c870190</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 11:55:30 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by max solomon</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>the dem nomination will be in the can by the time we have anything to say about it. </p>

<p>i really wish cascadia could secede. fuck em.</p>]]></description>
<author>max solomon</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/12/conversations_about_presidential_politic#c870237</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/12/conversations_about_presidential_politic#c870237</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 12:37:53 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Will in Seattle</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>@6 is right. Most of us are pretty happy with all the Dems this time.  It's only the Repugs that don't like any of their choices.</p>

<p>Sen Clinton will make a great US Supreme Court Justice during the Obama/Dodd presidency (although I think an Obama/Richardson presidency will be more fun).</p>]]></description>
<author>Will in Seattle</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/12/conversations_about_presidential_politic#c870344</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/12/conversations_about_presidential_politic#c870344</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 14:04:56 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Bauhaus</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Wonder what it'd be like having a president who actually needs the salary and could use the lifelong pension after his/her term?</p>

<p>I will be in So. Cal over the holidays, Christopher. Where's that rave, again? (Actually, I'm old enough to remember when Rave was a hair product).</p>]]></description>
<author>Bauhaus</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/12/conversations_about_presidential_politic#c870420</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/12/conversations_about_presidential_politic#c870420</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 15:01:27 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by magdaddy</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>I am pretty convinced that if his wife weren't running, Bill Clinton would support his old comrade Bill Richardson in  a heartbeat. The man's been in Congress, been on a cabinet, traveled to countries like North Korea and Iraq to secure prisoner releases (he looked Saddam Hussein in the eye - before he was dead - and made demands) and now, running New Mexico, has a reasonable immigration stance and has fought to secure health care for the residents of his own state. So why is he so far down the list of likely candidates? When I look at Obama, I see Richardson lite. If only Bill would start campaigning...</p>]]></description>
<author>magdaddy</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/12/conversations_about_presidential_politic#c870718</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/12/conversations_about_presidential_politic#c870718</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 20:08:22 -0800</pubDate>
</item>


</channel>
</rss>
