Slog: News & Arts

RSS icon Comments on Clinton on the Attack

1

Hillary shouldn't be elected Dog Catcher, let alone president.

Women should not be in positions of leadership whatsoever. They are far too emotional. If they aren't too emotional then there are deeper problems, like metal instability, that make them that much more problematic.

Posted by ecce homo | December 3, 2007 12:28 PM
2

Eli,

Pray tell, what does the Clinton campaign pay you for your stenography? Don't take nothing for an answer; your labor is valuable!

Concerned Reader

Posted by wow | December 3, 2007 12:29 PM
3

Oh, ecce.

Posted by tsm | December 3, 2007 12:37 PM
4

i would like to know - exactly how stupid does she think we are? "they've been attacking my character." she just attacked obama's character *herself* in plain english this past weekend.

please, hillary, continue to play the role of the victim. from the "vast right wing conspiracy" to today - you do it so very well. that's always the first quality i look for when selecting a president.

Posted by brandon | December 3, 2007 12:44 PM
5

nobody cares about this crap. let's vote for someone who's stayed out of the poo slinging and can get something done-

richardson. someone with real executive experience, direct experience with diplomacy, and the green-minded candidate who can make emissions reduction happen.

enough with the opinion shouters, let's elect someone who can undo the mistakes of the bush administration, not someone who was a part of them.

Posted by Cale | December 3, 2007 12:48 PM
6

Sen Clinton seems to think that tactical victories will allow her to win a war for the nomination.

Sen Obama correctly realizes that you can win all the battles you want, but a better strategy is to win the war.

Posted by Will in Seattle | December 3, 2007 12:55 PM
7

Who would've guessed that ecce is a woman?

Posted by keshmeshi | December 3, 2007 1:04 PM
8

Why's the record always gotta get set straight? Why can't we let it be gay, which is clearly what it wants to do?

Posted by Greg | December 3, 2007 1:23 PM
9

Bareback Osama is a GIANT queefing Douche bag! er Barak Osama... er Babeback Obama...

Posted by Madge-YoursoakingINIT! | December 3, 2007 1:27 PM
10

We have to be concerned with nominating a candidate who can actually beat the Republicans this time. While I think many of the Democratic nominees have this chance (did you see the Republican YouTube debate? They're screwed), Hillary does not. 50% of people are already not likely to vote for her. I don't think anyone is excited about extending the Clinton / Bush era of the past. Hillary is the only one that can solidify a fractured Republican apparatus (especially the evangelicals), out of pure hatred of her and Bill. And for a person that polls the lowest in credibility, it would seem Hillary would try to avoid adding fuel to that fire!

We have to concentrate our support for the candidate most likely to beat Hillary for the nomination. For now, Obama is the only one with that ability.

Posted by sam_iv | December 3, 2007 1:38 PM
11

I seem to recall a similar argument that put Kerry into the general elections...

Posted by Cale | December 3, 2007 1:42 PM
12

@1: Metal instability sounds pretty BRUTAL.

Posted by Vasya | December 3, 2007 2:16 PM
13

presidential politics makes me want to move to yurip.

Posted by max solomon | December 3, 2007 2:40 PM
14

i thought it was a pretty strong statement. not a lot of holes in that, because hillary knows her shit, which is why she should win.

Posted by kim | December 3, 2007 2:49 PM
15

@10,11 - no, one needs to choose the candidate who would be the best President for America. Luckily, that's Sen Obama, since President Gore isn't running again.

Posted by Will in Seattle | December 3, 2007 3:00 PM
16

@ 15-

See GIANT queefing Douche Bag comment @ #9

Posted by Lola | December 3, 2007 3:39 PM

Comments Closed

In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 45 days old).