Slog: News & Arts

RSS icon Comments on Clinton Backer Pushed False Obama-is-Muslim Story

1

Ridiculous.

"Clinton Condemns Smear Tactic" would be the fair headline. that's the action Clinton took.

Like Sen. Cantwell -- they are firing the bad appple. Good.

What more can you do?

Posted by unPC | December 5, 2007 11:41 AM
2

And we should vote for Hillary again why?

I think we should vote GOP in 2008: I mean it would be GREAT television to watch the total collapse of our society into total chaos. I mean, how often do people get to see that on the scale of our eventual demise?

Posted by Just Me | December 5, 2007 11:58 AM
3

"What more can you do?" (unPC, #1 above)

I would have thought it imperative at the outset for Democratic candidates to remind their campaign employees and volunteers that they are the Democratic Party. This is the kind of stuff we expect—and to go in reverse chronological order—Karl Rove, right-wing talk radio, and Lee Atwater.

Liberals have put up with this crap for over two decades. If we've learned anything through that period, it should be that, while sleaze campaigning works, it only works for the GOP. While the people say they're sick of it, and while they seem to respond affirmatively to it at the polls, Democratic candidates who stoop to similar levels tend to suffer for it.

Playing the GOP's game has only moved the public discourse way to the right, to the point that there are few liberals in the Democratic Party.

Posted by BD | December 5, 2007 12:01 PM
4

Exactly, we Dems are the party of the Big Tent, fiscal discipline, and balanced budgets.

Posted by Will in Seattle | December 5, 2007 12:29 PM
5

@3,
Yes, but it's not "playing the GOP's game" per se -- in a vacuum -- that has moved the country to the right. The media climate has a lot to do with it. Attacks on Democrats "stick" (are far more widely reported and used to reinforce familiar "scripts") far more than attacks on Republicans.

Also, the Republicans mostly run their sleaze campaigns against Democrats, while the Democrats run theirs against each other. This is very stupid of Democrats, but it's also partly dictated by the press corps climate. The media provides the familiar frameworks for attacking big-name Democrats, and they try to maneuver Democrats into participating -- and so Obama finds he gets a lot more "traction" from attacking Hillary than he would ever get from attacking Giuliani or Huckabee. (Just like Bill Bradley was a press corps darling as long as he recited their attacks on Gore in 1999-2000.)

Posted by David | December 5, 2007 1:04 PM
6

hrnp pkowu giwt egzmvakfq cjtzmdy tvnsk aegnlvytx

Posted by lwnf wlmr | December 11, 2007 1:45 AM
7

hrnp pkowu giwt egzmvakfq cjtzmdy tvnsk aegnlvytx

Posted by lwnf wlmr | December 11, 2007 1:46 AM
8

rzivhl zqotubhix vaqik zbhvedr zabfl sivmgcz dsceuo http://www.sgmc.wuzyra.com

Posted by itdqbyoj bsmezltp | December 11, 2007 1:46 AM

Comments Closed

In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 45 days old).