Don't worry,I can't afford to bid on those things.
Besides, while I occationally differ in opinion, I do owe my life to The Stranger... quite literally. So I would endevour to do a good job if I had bid and won such a worthy prize for charity's sake.
Which is why I stopped at $400.
I'm guessing these rules weren' pointed at some like Mr. Poe, but more towards someone like Ken Hutch. i'm sure he wouldn't mind putting some of his hate-speech money towards forcing the word of god onto slog readers screens.
I can think of someone whose handle begins with "ecce" and ends with "mo" who might have trouble adhering to the rules.
Break the rules, lose your Slogging rights.
The Slogging rights we’re currently auctioning off are the same rights all edit staffers and a few freelancers enjoy
My first act would be to turn on the commenting on the missing snowboarder post.
Adding caveats to something already running for $405 is a little taboo..
Whoever wins shouldn't allow any comments on their diaries. That would be great. Too bad that guy who took out the full-page rant ads died, I'd love to see him posting on Slog. For about a minute, anyway.
get over it.
Aw shucks - I was planning to do a big series of naked women.
You seem to favor hairless young, some seem really young, men.
Maybe I will make posters and put them on City Light poles late at night instead.
If I was the slog winner I would do nothing but economic/financial posts.
I would totally bring my right-wing rants here if only I had $406.
Of course they can't do it about everyone the staff has ever slept with - they only HAVE a WEEK.
"...or screaming indictments of everyone on the masthead..."
Dan Savage, hypocrite maximus.
What an ass. He calls everyone a jackass, dickhead, asshole etc. But the one time anyone gets a true opportunity...for charity!...to do payback...he sets some rules. Can't trash Dan or the short guy.
Yeah, @14, because "payback" is such a grown-up thing to do!
Wait... you guys edit Slog?
I wanna see some evidence of that.
"The winner doesn’t have to like us—it would be more interesting if someone that didn’t got the item"
With grammar skills like yours, Savage, the editing should be a real joy to behold.
someone WHO didn't. Persons are not things.
In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 45 days old).