<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Slog - Comments on 2007</title>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/12/2007_2</link>
<description>Toward a file sharing solution. The Wall Street Journal (quietly) has the story: In the latest development to highlight the shifting economics of the music industry, social-networking service Imeem Inc. announced today a licensing agreement allowing its users to listen free to the music of Vivendi SA&apos;s Universal Music Group. Closely held Imeem, which claims around 19 million monthly users, allows its members to embed songs and music videos on personal pages and playlists. The songs can&apos;t be downloaded or stored on computers or iPods; for users who want to do that, Imeem supplies links to Apple Inc.&apos;s iTunes store...</description>
<copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 08:25:13 -0800</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 09:15:49 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<generator>http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.34</generator>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

<item>
<title>Comment by Nada Rienski</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>This is not a solution.  The solution is when the Record Company Cartel is finally broken (and hopefully not just supplanted by some new-age cartel).</p>

<p>I have an imeem account.   They do not have agreements for most of their content, and eventually almost everything gets lopped down to the 30-second free-sample limit.</p>

<p>For now, imeem is just another 2nd-generation dotcom.</p>]]></description>
<author>Nada Rienski</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/12/2007_2#c872003</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/12/2007_2#c872003</guid>
<category>News</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 09:15:49 -0800</pubDate>
</item>


</channel>
</rss>