Slog News & Arts

Line Out

Music & Nightlife

« Lowering Fares Is Not the Answ... | Bill Nye the Science Guy's Fun... »

Tuesday, November 20, 2007

What’s Next For the Fun Forest?

posted by on November 20 at 14:44 PM

Today, the City Council’s Parks Committee will be voting on whether to recommend the couil cut a deal with the Seattle Center Fun Forest’s current operators. The deal would lower the amusement park’s rent in exchange for ending their lease in 2009. The current lease expires in 2014.

Well, a private consultant—working with ex-theme park executives and developers—says he’s been courting the Center for a year, and wants to build a new amusement park at the site. The consultant, John Sutherland—who previously worked on a failed $100 million Lakewood theme park project, and started a mountain bike center in Snoqualmie Pass—says one of his top priorities, if he gets the site, is to incorporate a skatepark into the Fun Forest.

The city’s been struggling to relocate the SeaSk8 skatepark—which used to sit just east of the Center—and neither skaters nor Seattle Center festival promoters are happy with the Pavilion site near Key Arena, which the council chose in August.

Richard Conlin, who’s on the parks committee, says he doesn’t want to revisit the SeaSk8 relocation process unless skaters are willing to enter the fray. Ryan Barth, chair of the Parks Department’s Skate Park Advisory Committee (SPAC) says SPAC is more than willing to restart the relocation process if it means skaters get a bigger and less expensive site. The Pavilion site is estimated to cost $2.9 million for 8,500 square feet of skateable space.

RSS icon Comments

1

wait, does that mean pay to skate?

Posted by infrequent | November 20, 2007 3:03 PM
2

it's like "gay for pay" but on a skateboard.

Posted by michael strangeways | November 20, 2007 3:15 PM
3

No. The skatepark would be free. It would be a way to draw families into the park.

Posted by Jonah S | November 20, 2007 3:21 PM
4

After getting such an incredible deal on the property and displacing SeaSk8, it really seems like the Gates Foundation should be able to throw a few million dollars at this problem to solve it once and for all. Yes, realize that I'm suggesting that we steal money from Malaria-ridden children so that people in Seattle can skate, but I'm so sick of hearing about how hard it is to find a new skatepark.

Posted by josh | November 20, 2007 3:23 PM
5

Great. Because the thing that the Seattle Center needs is more skate punks wandering about.

Posted by Burgin99 | November 20, 2007 3:24 PM
6

greeeeeenspppaaaaacee!!!!

Posted by Cale | November 20, 2007 3:49 PM
7

How about a No-Fun Forest, simulating the experience of waiting to testify at city council meetings.

I don't understand it, but whatever it is has been drawing SRO crowds in Seattle for as long as anybody can remember!

Posted by RonK, Seattle | November 20, 2007 3:59 PM
8

I'm willing to pay if I want to buy food or coffee, but not to use the sk8park.

Bring back the bubbleator!

Posted by Will in Seattle | November 20, 2007 4:05 PM
9

Turn the whole fucking five acres into a skatepark. It'll be insanely huge, and food and drink vendors in the adjacent areas can make a fortune. Do it! Do it now before insane dog owners like myself demand that it's turned into an off leash area!

Posted by Gitai | November 20, 2007 4:54 PM
10

Excellent idea, Gitai.

Posted by Will in Seattle | November 20, 2007 5:16 PM
11

Best use of bolding. Ever.

Posted by Amelia | November 20, 2007 11:07 PM

Comments Closed

In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 14 days old).