Slog - Comments on The Morning News

Comment by Mike in MO

Mike in MO — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 07:55:40 -0800

�Watching this debate, I hereby predict that the winner of the GOP nomination will be a total asshole.�

Wow, he's really going out on a limb there...

Comment by giffy

giffy — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 07:57:14 -0800

Saw this in the sex toys article.

Is it just me or does that look like a really good way to damage your orifices or put an eye out.

nothing like a really long poll, attached to a spring, that your supposed to pound at will mildly distracted by orgasm.

Comment by tsm

tsm — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 08:41:09 -0800

Remember when the GOP at least made the facade of trying to attract voters other than old, well-off exurban/rural white guys? I'm glad they've dropped it.

Comment by Paul Andrews

Paul Andrews — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 08:53:34 -0800

Dan, the link on the Venus story is wrong...I only noticed because from the headline I thought it was about Venus Velazquez ;^)

Comment by DOUG.

DOUG. — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 09:00:29 -0800

Why no report on Drunkie Jane Hague weaseling her way out of a DUI? Is this not a case of judge shopping?

Comment by STJA

STJA — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 09:06:30 -0800

I think it's hilarious that the link to the mention of Venus goes to the Republican debate article.

Comment by Original Monique

Original Monique — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 09:08:33 -0800

Totally off-topic, but why is the GOP live blog not showing? I would love to read it, as I was in traffic during the debate.... =(

Comment by Michigan Matt

Michigan Matt — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 09:14:39 -0800

On the same trip to NYC that I saw Sutton Foster in Thoroughly Modern Millie I was fortunate enough to see her brother in Urinetown. God. I love that show.

Comment by Bellevue Ave

Bellevue Ave — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 09:41:16 -0800

Thank god broadway is back! I have tickets to see avenue q around new years.

Comment by Sargon Bighorn

Sargon Bighorn — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 09:50:26 -0800

Avenue Q is well done, I saw it in June this year. Really cute. The "Bad News Bears" are a hoot. I'm glad the strike is over, Gay Americans can now get back to entertaining the world.

Comment by chicagogaydude

chicagogaydude — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 10:28:31 -0800

FYI, Thers wrote the comment on Atrios' site, not the A-man himself.

Comment by Hal

Hal — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 12:07:32 -0800

Fuck "Avenue Q." You might as well go see the Lion King or Tarzan, or any other Disney related Broadway travisty.

Go see "Rock'N'Roll" starring Brian Cox, if yous want to see theat-ah done right!

Fucking tourists!

Comment by Bellevue Ave

Bellevue Ave — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 12:54:18 -0800

Hal, when I am going to NYC I will be a tourist.

Comment by Hal

Hal — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 13:11:47 -0800

My point exactly. Nothing personal, but shows like "Avenue Q" aim directly at small town rubes' ideas of a night on Broadway. With a little research, you could get sooooo much more for your $$$ in terms of artistic merit.

Then again my friends all call me a culture snob, so don' listen to me.

Comment by Danny Haszard

Danny Haszard — Fri, 30 Nov 2007 00:50:28 -0800

Jehovah's Witnesses elders will investigate and disfellowship any Jehovah Witness who takes a blood transfusion,to say the issue is a 'personal conscience matter' is subterfuge to keep the Watchtower out of lawsuits.

Many Jehovah's Witnesses men,women and children die every year worldwide due to blood transfusion ban.Rank & file Jehovah's Witness are indoctrinated to be scared to death of blood.

FYI
1) JW's DO USE many parts aka 'fractions' aka components of blood,so if it's 'sacred' to God why the hypocritical contradiction flip-flop?

2) They USE blood collections that are donated by Red cross and others but don't donate back,more hypocrisy.

3) The Watchtower promotes and praises bloodless elective surgeries,this is a great advancement indeed.BUT it's no good to me if I am bleeding to death from a car crash and lose half my blood volume and need EMERGENCY blood transfusion.

Know this,the reason that JW refuse blood is because of their spin on the 3000 year old Biblical old testament,modern medicine will eventually make blood donations and transfusions a thing of the past.When this technology happens it won't vindicate the Jehovah's Witnesses and all the deaths that have occured so far.
The Watchtower's rules against blood transfusions will eventually be abolished (very gradually to reduce wrongful death lawsuit liability) even now most of the blood 'components' are allowed.
In 20 years there will be artificial blood and the Red Cross will go on with other noble deeds.

None of these changes will absolve the Watchtower leaders or vindicate their twisted doctrines
Are there dangers from blood?There are over 500 aspirin deaths in USA yearly.
---
Danny Haszard born 1957 3rd generation Jehovah's Witness

Comment by qmbu lfmgxwqy

qmbu lfmgxwqy — Tue, 11 Dec 2007 03:42:49 -0800

deqyz fxmz cmdzoq iepvbowa svxwr odazy skynga

Comment by mfvigspwn eclgynxw

mfvigspwn eclgynxw — Tue, 11 Dec 2007 03:44:32 -0800

gnzym nbwu wsxgr pwdgnl gqiue cgxvjdkqy rgsf http://www.yohntibg.nfyqzh.com