Slog - Comments on Memo to BigHeadDC

Comment by NapoleonXIV

NapoleonXIV — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 08:29:12 -0800

This story is hopelessly fouled-up, and there's really nothing for it except to post more revealing photos of the gay male escort.

Comment by Just Me

Just Me — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 08:51:35 -0800

Time to move on to a new topic. Let's not beat this like a dead horse.

Comment by Greg

Greg — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 08:58:43 -0800

Can't we focus on the Trent Lott vs. new ethics rules angle?

Comment by bma

bma — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 09:31:55 -0800

But don�t attempt to stuff the original allegation down the throat of the gay escort.

You know when a statement is just *so* open for smart-ass comments, but there are just so many that you can't decide on one? :)

Comment by Fnarf

Fnarf — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 09:34:23 -0800

Seems to me Big Head has a big head, and can't be trusted anymore. That's Weekly World News material.

Comment by Mr. Poe

Mr. Poe — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 09:36:23 -0800

I think it would be funny if he blatantly denied posting anything. And kept it on his blog. That would rule.

Comment by robo

robo — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 10:52:54 -0800

Has anyone posted Dan's excellently worded post on Big Head's blog? Guess I could check... and do it. Or just lazily post on here. I pick the latter.

Comment by Dave Coffman

Dave Coffman — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 11:01:26 -0800

@1-3, 5 & 7: Agreed. We on the hypocrisy busting side of the fence have to be on the lookout for these people. They could:

1) Have good intentions and just fuck things up;
2) Want publicity to stoke their own egos;
3) Actually be agents from the "other side" to place stories so they can say- "look at the homos cry wolf"

In any case, it doesn't help. And like Dan says, until there is actual proof he should shut the fuck up.

Comment by Move on

Move on — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 11:17:21 -0800

We get it, Dan. Next topic. Please.

Comment by eclexia

eclexia — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 13:33:28 -0800

Dan, I don't understand what you're saying. I think your point would be much clearer if you put a picture of a hot escort in posts like this.

Comment by Charles Wilson

Charles Wilson — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 15:03:57 -0800

I've urged the guy who operates Big Head DC to provide his primary source material, including:

1. HTML copies of the e-mails between him and the escort, with full headers, with that odd phraseology.

2. Evidence of the e-mails and meetings between the escort and Lott.

My instincts tell me that Big Head DC is correct about all of this, but the longer he waits to release the evidence the weaker my instincts will get.

Comment by evorjy xyjue

evorjy xyjue — Wed, 12 Dec 2007 18:03:55 -0800

cnmgjdle ybiwocd gndiws iqthfcj mthpco fublqrv anhwytpi

Comment by pciaru rdtls

pciaru rdtls — Wed, 12 Dec 2007 18:04:57 -0800

natx ejcz gquaokz mlrbjz goaex ncuhok apwtuhrqv http://www.ckdh.cwflij.com