<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Slog - Comments on Election Prediction</title>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/11/election_prediction</link>
<description>We&apos;re going to get a count tonight—at about 8:15—from King County Elections of about 100,000 absentee ballots. They also project that when all is said and done, about 72 percent of the total vote, which they guesstimate at 467,570, will come in absentees. (That&apos;s about 338,000). They&apos;re also going to report on the poll count at around 10:30. The poll vote is supposed to be about 28 percent of the total vote. So my sense is the 8:15 drop won&apos;t tell us a lot unless the margins are more than three points (and so says an election wonk friend of...</description>
<copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 17:07:09 -0800</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 10:20:18 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<generator>http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.34</generator>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

<item>
<title>Comment by Spitfire</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Spitfire will have the results on 21 tvs and free wifi. Come join us</p>]]></description>
<author>Spitfire</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/11/election_prediction#c843352</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/11/election_prediction#c843352</guid>
<category>News</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 17:11:18 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Will in Seattle</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>OK, Josh, I'll leak my predictions on those measures:</p>

<p>Prop 1 (roads and transit) loses<br />
Measure 67 (insurance reform) wins <br />
4204 (simple majority for school levies) wins<br />
Bill Sherman for KC Prosecutor. (DISAGREE - hope I'm right)</p>

<p>And in the City Council races:</p>

<p>Jean Godden<br />
Bruce Harrell (HOPE VENUS WINS, but ...)<br />
David Della</p>

<p>For Port:<br />
Gael Tarleton (hope I'm right)<br />
Alec Fisken</p>

<p>Only two where I disagree with you. Not bad!</p>]]></description>
<author>Will in Seattle</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/11/election_prediction#c843357</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/11/election_prediction#c843357</guid>
<category>News</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 17:19:33 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by tsm</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>"Prop 1 (roads and transit) loses."</p>

<p>Wishful thinking, Josh.</p>]]></description>
<author>tsm</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/11/election_prediction#c843365</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/11/election_prediction#c843365</guid>
<category>News</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 17:32:28 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Mr. Poe</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Prop 1 will lose tsm, and you know it.</p>]]></description>
<author>Mr. Poe</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/11/election_prediction#c843369</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/11/election_prediction#c843369</guid>
<category>News</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 17:38:55 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by SeMe</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>exit polls have prop 1 tanking.</p>]]></description>
<author>SeMe</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/11/election_prediction#c843372</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/11/election_prediction#c843372</guid>
<category>News</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 17:46:15 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by grznt</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p><i>exit polls have prop 1 tanking</i><br />
<br /><br /><br />
link please?  otherwise, nice job talking out your ass.</p>]]></description>
<author>grznt</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/11/election_prediction#c843375</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/11/election_prediction#c843375</guid>
<category>News</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 17:51:09 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by kid icarus</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>MOOOORTAL KOOOOOMBAT!!!<br />
*grabs popcorn*</p>]]></description>
<author>kid icarus</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/11/election_prediction#c843377</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/11/election_prediction#c843377</guid>
<category>News</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 17:55:55 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Cale</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>you think bruce harrell will win just because of the drunk driving incident?</p>

<p>and prop 1 will pass. among likely voters prop 1 did quite well in the polls and i hear there is a low voter turnout this year. so those who went are probably... the likely voters!</p>

<p>and when we are talking about final alignments for light rail this time next year instead of how to get it back on the ballot, you won't regret voting yes. </p>]]></description>
<author>Cale</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/11/election_prediction#c843383</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/11/election_prediction#c843383</guid>
<category>News</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 18:05:49 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Meinert</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Party will definitely be after 9pm at the Spitfire. Whatever your position on all this shit, and I do mean shit, except for Sherman, you should come down and have a drink and we can watch the results. Should  be fun. Like Sam Sheepdog and Ralph Wolf after work. We might even get to turn Feit into a Pinata</p>]]></description>
<author>Meinert</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/11/election_prediction#c843384</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/11/election_prediction#c843384</guid>
<category>News</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 18:06:22 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by MUST STAY SECRET</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>so where will Burgess be as he cries in his beer</p>

<p>is he really CIA?</p>]]></description>
<author>MUST STAY SECRET</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/11/election_prediction#c843392</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/11/election_prediction#c843392</guid>
<category>News</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 18:12:40 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Gomez</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Based on my admittedly limited POV over everyone I've seen discuss the matter all over, I've noticed a sharply divided 50/50 split among Seattlites on Prop 1 for reasons readers here are aware of... and a massive groundswell against it in the suburbs and exurbs because of the fucking MVET fees and the distaste for decades of construction slowdowns.  I'm thinking it'll fall by a 2:1 margin.  :(  I'd like to be wrong but I can't deny my extended observations.</p>]]></description>
<author>Gomez</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/11/election_prediction#c843397</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/11/election_prediction#c843397</guid>
<category>News</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 18:20:06 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by zzyzx</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>The snarkiness here inspired me to actually go out and vote for Prop 1.  Thanks :)</p>]]></description>
<author>zzyzx</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/11/election_prediction#c843409</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/11/election_prediction#c843409</guid>
<category>News</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 19:18:45 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Big Sven</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Gomez- I don't understand.  Will says that if this fails there will be a transit bill in Feb '08.  But if you're right, and suburbanites defeat a bill that's $10b for urban transit and $7b for suburban roads, how will the suburban voters pass a bill that's *all* urban transit?</p>

<p>Oh that's right, the 400,000 Seattle voters will come out in such strong numbers that they will swamp the 2,600,000 suburban skeptics.  Never mind. </p>]]></description>
<author>Big Sven</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/11/election_prediction#c843426</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/11/election_prediction#c843426</guid>
<category>News</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 20:15:52 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by COMTE</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Well, as of 8:18 p.m. Prop 1 is indeed tanking, 47.67% to 55.33% with 124368 absentee ballots tabulated.</p>

<p>I-960 looks to be DOA as well, with 45.52% to 54.48% and 144,622 ballots counted.</p>

<p>R-67 on the other hand looks like a shoo-in; 62.6% to 37.4%, while HJR 4204 may still be too close to call with 52.53% yea & 47.47 nays.</p>

<p>Funny, the KC Metro Elections Results page is showing party affiliations for a supposedly "non-partisan" County Prosecutor's race, but in any case it looks like it's going to be Satterberg over Sherman, 54.24% to 45.59%.</p>

<p>Godden is kicking Swaja's ass, no surprise there, but wow, look at the Velasquez, Harrell race: with a little over 13% counted, Harrell has a very strong 61.22% lead over the incumbent's 38.43%.  And Burgess is stomping on Della, 61.01% to 38.6%, while Clark is making quick work of Fenton 74% to 25%.</p>]]></description>
<author>COMTE</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/11/election_prediction#c843428</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/11/election_prediction#c843428</guid>
<category>News</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 20:33:06 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Brian in Seattle</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>I posted this in the P-I's early results forum and I'm just going to repost it here about Prop 1.</p>

<p>   "Congratulations to the 2 extremes on both sides! Now you can go back to fighting amongst yourselves like the little children that you are..</p>

<p>   1 side only wants new roads and no transit, the other side just wants new transit and no new roads. The pragmatic middle ground who realizes we need new infrastructure of all types got voted down again. Its very depressing.<br />
Have fun being stuck in traffic and paying 4.00-4.50 a gallon gasoline next May with no alternative in the works. All of you have brought it upon yourselves."</p>]]></description>
<author>Brian in Seattle</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/11/election_prediction#c843436</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/11/election_prediction#c843436</guid>
<category>News</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 21:02:43 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Mosquito Fleeter</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Not to gloat or anything Brian, but while everyone else is stuck in traffic, I'll be scooting to work in 15 minutes.  And even at $4.50 a gallon, I'll still be spending less than $7.00 a week on gas.</p>]]></description>
<author>Mosquito Fleeter</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/11/election_prediction#c843442</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/11/election_prediction#c843442</guid>
<category>News</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 21:08:35 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by SeMe</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>like i said at 5 the exit polls had it tanking. never let it be said that SeMe did not tell yall so.</p>]]></description>
<author>SeMe</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/11/election_prediction#c843446</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/11/election_prediction#c843446</guid>
<category>News</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 21:15:59 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Brian in Seattle</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Well, I take the bus myself so I don't really spend that much on gas myself. But the truth is the extremes on both side killed this proposition. Its depressing. I found it to be well balanced because we really do need more of EVERYTHING. Not just one or the other as much as the two extremes would like us to believe. </p>]]></description>
<author>Brian in Seattle</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/11/election_prediction#c843453</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/11/election_prediction#c843453</guid>
<category>News</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 21:25:04 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Gomez</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>13.  Will doesn't know what he's talking about.  Someone in the county hinted at the possibility of a revote without any real substantial details, and the eternally hopeful urbanists jumped on it and took it as fact.  It's hot air.</p>]]></description>
<author>Gomez</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/11/election_prediction#c843483</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/11/election_prediction#c843483</guid>
<category>News</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 22:35:57 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Will in Seattle</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm. I only lost two of my predictions.</p>

<p>Not bad.</p>

<p>Too bad Gomez has no frickin clue how politics works.  I've been negotiating the terms of the revotes for a while now, and I know there are meetings next week the Stranger isn't supposed to know about.</p>

<p>See you at Jeannie's wrapup if you have the stones to admit it.</p>]]></description>
<author>Will in Seattle</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/11/election_prediction#c843783</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/11/election_prediction#c843783</guid>
<category>News</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 10:19:29 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Will in Seattle</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>oh, sorry, forgot the David Della prediction. bygones, that means three wrong. not bad.</p>]]></description>
<author>Will in Seattle</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/11/election_prediction#c843786</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/11/election_prediction#c843786</guid>
<category>News</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 10:20:18 -0800</pubDate>
</item>


</channel>
</rss>