2008 Edwards, RNC Attack Clintons’ Debate Performance
posted by November 2 at 9:06 AM
onThe Politics of Pile On? Edwards calls it the Politics of Parsing:
And the RNC has a few things to say about it, too:
« The Morning News | Obama on Playing the Gender Ca... »
posted by November 2 at 9:06 AM
onThe Politics of Pile On? Edwards calls it the Politics of Parsing:
And the RNC has a few things to say about it, too:
Comments
Like Kyle's mom, she's a bitch. Better get used to her.
If Clinton gets the democratic nomination, I will emphatically support her. If Obama gets the nomination, I will do the same. If Edwards gets the nomination, I will vote for Steven Colbert...
This is pretty early on. I imagine her PR machine will be able to fix these wobbles before it really matters.
And I will take her wobbly answers over Obama's foriegn policy answers ANYDAY
and I will take her wobbly answers over Edwards, as I think he is the slime-est piece of shit running (so many people seem to have forgotten when he left Kerry high and dry the month before 2004 election)
So yeah, uh, she still sounds better than any other candidates running right now.
Nice job of turning the Slog into Republican multimedia distribution system. Well done, Eli.
COMTE mentioned it elsewhere (I'm paraphrasing)- "it takes six of you to equal one of me" != "I'm a widdle gwirl! Waaaa!" I believe she is arguing the former; her opponents, Republicants, and progressive slog posters are arguing the latter.
Yes, Big Sven, what with links to the Politico, the Page, and the RNC, this has become another part of the right-wing echo chamber.
See (also for the link to the debate transcript)
http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/11/the_backlash_against_the_politics_of_vic#c840427
@2 said it best.
I'm with @2.
I think Hillary's answers were actually well stated, and I think it is only by playing to ignorance and politics that you can say otherwise.
Edwards shames himself in this instance, in my opinion.
@7: Where can I get some of that Clinton Cool-Aid you're drinking? I'm pretty parched.
Sorry...I don't like kool aid. I'm not even a decided supporter of HRC, yet.
These are complicated issues, and the more we required sound-bite answers to complicated issues, the worse our politics become. Edwards knows these are complicated issues, and he was seeking to box HRC in, not because he necessarily disagrees with the position of HRC, but because he needed the controversy in order to get a toe-hold in the race for the White House.
If you're parched, @8, I urge you to seek something more nourishing than kool-aid.
Gosh! Who needs Rebublican Party Ads when the Edwards Campaign makes them for you, and better!
What an ass. Why is he attacking another Dem instead of talking about his strengths... oh, yeah... that's right... because he doesn't really have any strengths.
Comments Closed
In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 14 days old).