<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Slog - Comments on Romney Says Hillary Would be Like &quot;an Intern&quot; as President</title>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/10/romney_says_hillary_would_be_like_an_int</link>
<description>I&apos;ll leave it to the arbiters of what&apos;s sexist and not to tell me whether Mitt Romney crossed the line tonight on Hannity &amp; Colmes. But if this is going to be a consistent line of attack from him, I believe he&apos;ll have some explaining to do: She’s never run anything. She’s never had the occasion of being in the private sector, running a business, or, for that matter, running a state or a city. She hasn’t run anything, and the government of the United States is not a place for a president to be an intern. You need to...</description>
<copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 17:10:18 -0800</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 13:18:22 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<generator>http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.34</generator>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

<item>
<title>Comment by maxsolomon</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>go ask the big dog who's the boss, stupid fucking mormon.</p>]]></description>
<author>maxsolomon</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/10/romney_says_hillary_would_be_like_an_int#c836033</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/10/romney_says_hillary_would_be_like_an_int#c836033</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 17:25:08 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by keshmeshi</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>What an idiot.  Nothing but air in that Ken-doll brain.</p>]]></description>
<author>keshmeshi</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/10/romney_says_hillary_would_be_like_an_int#c836035</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/10/romney_says_hillary_would_be_like_an_int#c836035</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 17:27:13 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by tsm</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>I wouldn't buy that it's inherently sexist, but it sure is a steaming crock of shit.</p>]]></description>
<author>tsm</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/10/romney_says_hillary_would_be_like_an_int#c836042</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/10/romney_says_hillary_would_be_like_an_int#c836042</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 17:31:10 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by NapoleonXIV</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>If Hillary was even remotely like an intern, we'd never have had Monicagate, would we?</p>]]></description>
<author>NapoleonXIV</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/10/romney_says_hillary_would_be_like_an_int#c836045</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/10/romney_says_hillary_would_be_like_an_int#c836045</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 17:32:41 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Y.F.</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Maybe he was talking about another Hillary ...one that wasn't married to Bill Clinton for two terms in the White House. Like Hillary Duff, or something.</p>]]></description>
<author>Y.F.</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/10/romney_says_hillary_would_be_like_an_int#c836049</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/10/romney_says_hillary_would_be_like_an_int#c836049</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 17:37:27 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by matthew fisher wilder</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Senators don't mean jack shit to Romney apparently.</p>]]></description>
<author>matthew fisher wilder</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/10/romney_says_hillary_would_be_like_an_int#c836050</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/10/romney_says_hillary_would_be_like_an_int#c836050</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 17:37:55 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by blaire</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Didnt he say something similiar at the last debate?</p>]]></description>
<author>blaire</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/10/romney_says_hillary_would_be_like_an_int#c836051</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/10/romney_says_hillary_would_be_like_an_int#c836051</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 17:38:02 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by mattymatt</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Weird -- that's an easily disputable claim. Wikipedia has a nice long list of things she's run. For example:</p>

<p>- co-founded the Arkansas Advocates for Children and Families<br />
- chairperson of the Legal Services Corporation<br />
- chair of the Rural Health Advisory Committee<br />
- introduced Arkansas' Home Instruction Program for Preschool Youth<br />
- chaired the American Bar Association's Commission on Women in the Profession<br />
- on the boards of the Arkansas Children's Hospital Legal Services and the Children's Defense Fund<br />
- on the corporate board of directors of TCBY, Wal-Mart Stores, and Lafarge</p>

<p>...and so forth. Oh and also she's a state senator, for whatever that's worth.</p>

<p>Her career certainly seems to have had a more executive sheen than Mitt's.</p>]]></description>
<author>mattymatt</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/10/romney_says_hillary_would_be_like_an_int#c836068</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/10/romney_says_hillary_would_be_like_an_int#c836068</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 18:12:55 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Brandon h</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Has anyone noticed how everyone refers to clinton as "Hillary" and every other candidate by their last names? </p>

<p>And since when did running a business equal knowing how to run a country</p>

<p>*cough* Bush *cough*</p>]]></description>
<author>Brandon h</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/10/romney_says_hillary_would_be_like_an_int#c836070</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/10/romney_says_hillary_would_be_like_an_int#c836070</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 18:17:48 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by mikeblanco</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>I'm betting that Obama supporters know the difference between a US and a state senator.</p>

<p>Most of those Arkansas associations are the types of things that the Governor's wife always ends up "running."  In the case of Wal-mart since its headquarter is in Arkansas it was useful for them to have a friend at court.</p>]]></description>
<author>mikeblanco</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/10/romney_says_hillary_would_be_like_an_int#c836077</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/10/romney_says_hillary_would_be_like_an_int#c836077</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 18:31:07 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by arduous</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Brandon h, I have noticed that, and it bothers me, but I've been kind of putting it down to the fact that "Clinton" means Bill, so she has to be "Hillary."</p>

<p>Or you know it's unconscious sexism. But right now I prefer to view it as the former.</p>]]></description>
<author>arduous</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/10/romney_says_hillary_would_be_like_an_int#c836078</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/10/romney_says_hillary_would_be_like_an_int#c836078</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 18:31:21 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by elenchos</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>@8</p>

<p>Sitting on a bunch of committees and boards is not a form of executive experience.  Trying to pretend that it matches being a governor or mayor or CEO just makes you look weak and desperate.</p>

<p>Just admit that she doesn't have any executive experience and talk about what she can do.</p>]]></description>
<author>elenchos</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/10/romney_says_hillary_would_be_like_an_int#c836091</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/10/romney_says_hillary_would_be_like_an_int#c836091</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 18:46:45 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Michigan Matt</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>@9 and 11--Maybe it's because that's how she's putting herself out there?  Check out her website.  It's all "Hillary" all the time.  Methinks it's to combat any possible Clinton fatigue.  </p>]]></description>
<author>Michigan Matt</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/10/romney_says_hillary_would_be_like_an_int#c836094</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/10/romney_says_hillary_would_be_like_an_int#c836094</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 18:51:35 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by elenchos</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and if anyone says it is a sexist criticism, then you're saying you can't elect a woman because she will cry sexism every time she is attacked.  She needs to show she can be hit and then hit back without making everything about gender.  </p>

<p>John Edwards had to face the exact same objection and he couldn't say it was because he is a man.</p>]]></description>
<author>elenchos</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/10/romney_says_hillary_would_be_like_an_int#c836095</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/10/romney_says_hillary_would_be_like_an_int#c836095</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 18:51:36 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Mike</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Well, W was governor and ran several companies before he was appointed. That certainly turned out well, no?</p>]]></description>
<author>Mike</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/10/romney_says_hillary_would_be_like_an_int#c836096</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/10/romney_says_hillary_would_be_like_an_int#c836096</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 18:53:20 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Gitai</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>@9 Bush didn't know how to run a company.  He ran two of them into the ground.</p>]]></description>
<author>Gitai</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/10/romney_says_hillary_would_be_like_an_int#c836100</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/10/romney_says_hillary_would_be_like_an_int#c836100</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 19:04:25 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by jack</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>She's like an intern, except that SHE'S never gone down on Bill!  She's like the Bartleby of interns: "I prefer not to."</p>]]></description>
<author>jack</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/10/romney_says_hillary_would_be_like_an_int#c836114</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/10/romney_says_hillary_would_be_like_an_int#c836114</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 19:55:39 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by ms. mohr</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>I think there might be something to the idea that "Hillary" differentiates her from Bill, even though if we hear "Clinton" right now we'd probably be more likely to think "Hillary" not "Bill" b/c duh, she's the one campaigning.  I doubt it's rooted in sexism, and definitely don't think it's conscious sexism.  After all, we don't confuse Bush I w/ Bush II b/c we often call Bush II "Dubya" or something less flattering.  But perhaps the change is due to a conscious branding/positioning decision on the part of her campaign.  Maybe they're trying to humanize her, make her seem more relatable??</p>]]></description>
<author>ms. mohr</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/10/romney_says_hillary_would_be_like_an_int#c836120</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/10/romney_says_hillary_would_be_like_an_int#c836120</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 20:22:13 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by raindrop</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Well, the last senator to become president was JFK. So there is something to the fact that being a State Governor is a better training ground. And no, @8, the list you provided has nothing about executive experience - serving on boards doesn't cut it. Romney's point is valid. Still, I don't prefer him over Hillary, but I still dread Hillary.</p>]]></description>
<author>raindrop</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/10/romney_says_hillary_would_be_like_an_int#c836167</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/10/romney_says_hillary_would_be_like_an_int#c836167</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 22:51:39 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Chris in Tampa</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Experience is virtually worthless in a job that has hundreds of advisers. It's "experience" that frequently gets in the way of ideas and action. Provided the President is neither an obstinate stump, a puppet, or surrounds him or herself with sycophantic idiots(Or any combination of the three!), then just about anybody can be a decent president.</p>]]></description>
<author>Chris in Tampa</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/10/romney_says_hillary_would_be_like_an_int#c836172</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/10/romney_says_hillary_would_be_like_an_int#c836172</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 23:21:31 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by David Wright</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Eli's post is a blatent and spineless attempt to insuinuate that Romney's comment is sexist without actually saying so, because he doesn't want to put himself in the position of defending such a ridiculous assertion.</p>

<p>Romney has consistently contrasted his record of executive successes not only against Clinton, but against all the other major candidates, male and female, Republican and Democrat. And whether or not you think that a record of executive success is important for a president, he does pretty clearly have far and away the best record of any candidate on that account. He grew Bain Capital from scratch. He turned arround the Salt Lake City olympics. Even the "New Yorker" (an insufferable bastion of Republicanism, I know) pretty much grants him this point.</p>]]></description>
<author>David Wright</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/10/romney_says_hillary_would_be_like_an_int#c836185</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/10/romney_says_hillary_would_be_like_an_int#c836185</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 00:22:28 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Leyland</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>#20 - if that thinking is a result of the water in Florida, beware. You are off base totally.</p>

<p>Such an empty assertion. Talent is all in the President of anything. All those people on the payroll around you take all their clues from you.</p>

<p>Talent is the MOST important need.</p>

<p>Needed even to hire talent.</p>]]></description>
<author>Leyland</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/10/romney_says_hillary_would_be_like_an_int#c836208</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/10/romney_says_hillary_would_be_like_an_int#c836208</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 03:43:25 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by harry</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Perception is everything.  So it all depends on what “d” one looks for in Romney’s statement, whether it’s “dirt” or “diamond” ...OR in the famous intern’s case, she was looking for a “di_ _” ...LOL! </p>]]></description>
<author>harry</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/10/romney_says_hillary_would_be_like_an_int#c836258</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/10/romney_says_hillary_would_be_like_an_int#c836258</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 08:41:51 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Will in Seattle</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>So what does this make Mitt Romney?</p>

<p>I mean the guy has FIVE sons all eligible to serve in combat units in Iraq, and not a single one has signed up for a combat tour.</p>

<p>Does this make him ... unpatriotic?</p>

<p>Or just a coward?</p>]]></description>
<author>Will in Seattle</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/10/romney_says_hillary_would_be_like_an_int#c836388</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/10/romney_says_hillary_would_be_like_an_int#c836388</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 10:48:36 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Marie Jon&apos;</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Hillary is a total loser. Romany  is correct. We do not need an "intern running our country." President Bill Clinton allowed  al Qaeda to take foot in the Afghanistan, Iraq  as well as "in America." Who he heck needs these two?</p>

<p>Hillary  Documentary</p>

<p>YouTube - The Shocking Video Hillary Does NOT Want You To See! (1of2) <br />
YouTube - The Shocking Video Hillary Does NOT Want You To See! (2of2) <br />
</p>]]></description>
<author>Marie Jon&apos;</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/10/romney_says_hillary_would_be_like_an_int#c836581</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/10/romney_says_hillary_would_be_like_an_int#c836581</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 13:18:22 -0800</pubDate>
</item>


</channel>
</rss>