Slog: News & Arts

RSS icon Comments on Polling Washington

1

Who the hell ranks Obama #1 and Guilliani #2 ahead of Edwards and Clinton? Or do will some people in WA just not vote for any major party candidate if it's not Obama?

Posted by wha? | October 1, 2007 10:15 AM
2

Your're still going to get Clinton. Because the Democratic party hates you.

Posted by The Baron | October 1, 2007 10:18 AM
3

Black or white I'm not voting for ANYONE who's name sounds like "Osama"...
I can't believe Washingtonians are willing to vote for someone not because he has sound political experience- but because he is black... Blackedy-black-black... Oh, I'm... gonna... BARF!

Posted by Lil'Boy Blue | October 1, 2007 10:28 AM
4

I think part of it may be that Washington is one of the least racist states. I think most people here aren't dealing with the fact he is black, we just like his fresh views on politics.

Although personally, I think even though Obama is extremely likeable, I tend to agree with Edwards more on the issues. For instance, both Edwards and Obama have good ideas for setting standards and goals for renewable energy and carbon emissions, but Edwards has a plan to sell emissions permits and use the money to create a $13 billion a year fund to reseach clean, renewable, efficient technologies. Obama has no such plan for what I can tell.

Posted by Cale | October 1, 2007 10:30 AM
5

Who takes these polls? I mean specifically, what percentage of what percentage of the state participated in this particular poll? I didn't, and I'm voting for a president who doesn't have marionette strings dangling from his limbs.

Kucinich. 08.

Posted by Bryce | October 1, 2007 10:49 AM
6

SurveyUSA? Isn't that the same group that polls for KING5 by using Random Digit Dialing and a recorded voice asking the questions? Probably the most unreliable polling methodology imaginable. I wouldn't give this polly much credibility at all. Next topic, please

Posted by Partisanvoter | October 1, 2007 11:27 AM
7

Hold it Eli -- Obama does NOT "do best against all comers" in this poll. Read those numbers again. John Edwards does better against Thompson and Romney than Obama or Clinton. This is consistent with poll after poll that shows Edwards as the candidate that is most likely to take the Whitehouse regardless of who the GOP pick. The only edge this poll shows for Obama is against Rudy G. And if you compare those numbers with other polls they do not add up. Survey USA regularly pegs our state wrong, so I do not put much stock in these numbers. But bottom line -- given all the positive press Obama has received here, I suspect his campaign would have expected him to do better than trail Edwards in 2 of the key match ups. Which just proves: Washington wants a candidate who stands for the right things and who can win.

Posted by Jenny Durkan, Washington State Chair Edwards for President | October 1, 2007 11:57 AM
8

Hold it Eli -- Obama does NOT "do best against all comers" in this poll. Read those numbers again. John Edwards does better against Thompson and Romney than Obama or Clinton. This is consistent with poll after poll that shows Edwards as the candidate that is most likely to take the Whitehouse regardless of who the GOP pick. The only edge this poll shows for Obama is against Rudy G. And if you compare those numbers with other polls they do not add up. Survey USA regularly pegs our state wrong, so I do not put much stock in these numbers. But bottom line -- given all the positive press Obama has received here, I suspect his campaign would have expected him to do better than trail Edwards in 2 of the key match ups. Which just proves: Washington wants a candidate who stands for the right things and who can win.

Posted by Jenny Durkan, Washington State Chair Edwards for President | October 1, 2007 11:57 AM
9

The problem always is, they poll old fogies with land lines more often than cell phone users.

Just sayin.

Posted by Will in Seattle | October 1, 2007 12:02 PM
10

@ Jenny Durkan: True, Edwards does have a slightly wider spread than Obama when he's matched up against Romney and Thompson (but just barely).

However, Edwards gets significantly less support than Obama from Democrats in those match-ups. What does that mean?

I'll update my post to clarify, though.

Posted by Eli Sanders | October 1, 2007 12:17 PM
11

@4: Washington is hardly the least racist state.

Posted by matthew fisher wilder | October 1, 2007 12:30 PM
12

These results encourage me, actually! I have long warned of the dire, psycho anti-Hillary sentiment of the USA. The primaries don't mean shit- The democratic party wants Hill, so that's who we're getting. I predicted she'd win the primaries, lose in a presidential election, or win and get assassinated.
Well, this poll seems to indicate she can win the election, so half my worries are allayed. Now the only thing I have to worry about, assuming I'm right, is the consequences of her assassination. Will the veep veer hard right in response to the incident, or bring focus to the real biggest terrorist threat to America: Right wing Americans?
-

Posted by christopher | October 1, 2007 12:48 PM
13

matthew fisher wilder - how can it be racist when it doesn't have any black people?

Posted by The Baron | October 1, 2007 1:27 PM
14

@ Eli - "What does that mean" -- the fact that Edwards picks up more independents is exactly why he is our best shot. Core Blue is staying blue. We need the independents to win.

Posted by jenny Durkan, Washington State Chair Edwards for President | October 1, 2007 2:39 PM
15

is this surprising? consider washingtonians and politics for a minute. the state of let's vote on whether we'll vote on whether or not to let the politicians decide. makes sense that someone with no political savvy but enough touchy-feely oratory skills would come out ahead here.

Posted by kim | October 1, 2007 9:49 PM
16

washingtonians always love the outsider, or underdog hence the great showings here for bradley, tsongas, jerry brown, and others. it seems as if our collective political taste is decidedly left of center and cerebral, not populist or passionate.

Posted by chris | October 2, 2007 11:17 AM
17

Hi everybody
I've found it site accidentally
The site has an interesting title
I've read many corresnondences
I want to open a new theme
It will be interesting
By by,everybody
mortgage

Posted by mortgagevladim | October 12, 2007 6:46 AM

Comments Closed

In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 45 days old).