Slog News & Arts

Line Out

Music & Nightlife

« $$$ Burner Is Loaded $$$ | Re: Lukewarm Warm »

Friday, October 12, 2007

Please Sir, May We Have Some More?

posted by on October 12 at 11:15 AM

Budget1.jpgOn Wednesday night I headed over to the city council chambers to hear the citizens’ review of the Mayor’s proposed 2008 budget. If you have never been to one of these meetings, they’re quite the spectacle. Everyone within city limits who has a cause to support or an axe to grind is entitled to 2 minutes in which to publicly thank the council, take them to task, or ask for more money. The council theoretically processes all this information and suggests changes to the proposed budget. True to form, close to 100 different groups and individuals showed up to plead their cases, which ranged from the seemingly trivial (building more outdoor public pools) to the plainly necessary (expanding the budgets of food banks to afford fresh fruits and vegetables.)

Two causes in particular caught my attention and seemed worth discussing in much greater detail. First, a coalition of Human Service providers came forward to propose an alternative city budget. Among their detail was $12.5 million dollars which would form the base of a Housing Site Acquisition fund. The money would be available to non-profit organizations, including ad hoc tenants’ groups, so that they could quickly make down payments on apartment buildings that go on the market. The idea is that this would help save affordable housing and limit the number of apartment buildings bought by developers and turned into condos before the tenants even have the chance to get laughed out of a bank office. Among other supporters, Tim Harris of Real Change gave a passionate and well reasoned defense of the proposal, noting that Washington D.C. already has a similar $15 million fund in place, and New York has an available fund of $240 million. Apparently the idea was originally proposed by Councilman Rasmussen and has been circulating for a while. Perhaps the time is right to use of some of the Seattle Housing Levy to help low-income people buy their own property and stay in this city?
Budget2.jpg
The cause which drew the biggest crowd, by far, was the restoration of funding for the Cascade People’s Center. The CPC is a volunteer-run facility providing free programs for people in the South Lake Union neighborhood. They estimate that more than 8,000 people use the center each year. The City has been the single biggest supporter, providing the bulk of the CPC’s operating budget for the last 8 years. This year, the proposed city budget cuts funding entirely, leaving the center floundering for funds, and most likely shutting down. In response, the CPC has been mounting a powerful letter-writing campaign and staged a rally of support in which 100-odd people marched to City Hall with banners and flags and said their piece at the meeting. Supporters made the smart strategic move of letting the kids speak. It was a tremendous show of support. Whether or not it manages to budge the city council is, of course, a different question.

RSS icon Comments

1

Oooh, Text wrapping. I always wondered why I never saw more of that here.

Posted by Chris in Tampa | October 12, 2007 11:25 AM
2

Fresh fruit for homeless and cheap housing are terrible ideas. The faster we get poor people out of Seattle the better off the rest of us will be. Duh!

Posted by Bryan | October 12, 2007 11:34 AM
3

Ooooh. Let the kids speak. Not.

Posted by Mr. Poe | October 12, 2007 11:39 AM
4

I'm going to make yet another correct prediction.

None of this will change the removal of lower income housing in this city, either proportionally or totally, in that neighborhood.

There will be a net and gross reduction.

Time to wake up and consider 100-story inexpensive residential apartment buildings with required set-asides of 25 percent low income, 25 percent median income, and 25 percent allowed luxury apartments. With public green space around them.

It worked in Vancouver BC. It will work here.

Ignoring the growth won't change it. Small zoning increases won't change it.

And protests won't change it.

Posted by Will in Seattle | October 12, 2007 11:45 AM
5

100 storiez of inexpenzive houzing? Thiz I gotta see. Methinkz your making it all up. Sendus a pic or a link or a pink.

Posted by Franzine | October 12, 2007 11:51 AM
6

Every group that has the kids talk thinks it’s a brilliant stratagem.

Wrong. It just makes you look like your putting the kids up to it. Besides, do you really think they haven’t seen that trick before?

Posted by This Isn’t the Circus You Know | October 12, 2007 11:53 AM
7

tallest building in Van is 48 stories and it's not low income.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Vancouver's_10_tallest_skyscrapers

Posted by whatever | October 12, 2007 11:55 AM
8

I'm telling you, it was something to see. The kids weren't the only ones to speak on the matter - they followed two eloquent adults - but they were the easiest to relate to. Any adult can bullshit about his or her pet issue. It's a lot harder to put words in a kid's mouth and have them sound earnest. I believed Cascade mattered to these kids, and I wasn't the only one.

Posted by Gurldoggie | October 12, 2007 11:58 AM
9

These meetings' public speaking sessions are always a circus of obscure citizen axes to grind, in every city and principality. It never fails, and if you're somewhat emotionally detached from it all, it can be quite hilarious to watch.

Posted by Gomez | October 12, 2007 12:06 PM
10

Will has been going on about his 100-story buildings forever here. It doesn't say much for his sanity; 100-story buildings are expensive. Tatty apartments that have been there a while are cheap. There's no such thing as NEW low-income housing unless it's heavily subsidized and in inconsequential amounts.

Posted by Fnarf | October 12, 2007 12:18 PM
11

Those damn kids never stay on message!

Posted by J.R. | October 12, 2007 12:44 PM
12

It's called changing the debate.

You're all stuck on "preserving". We've seen what happens in the end with that - the poor people get shipped off to Kent.

I'm saying get your head out of the box and deal with reality.

Posted by Will in Seattle | October 12, 2007 12:55 PM
13

Fnarf, don't doubt too hard. I think I lived in that building, briefly. It's called the Yeti Towers. Vancouver. It's the tall one. Right there. See?

Posted by Lloyd Clydesdale | October 12, 2007 1:52 PM

Comments Closed

In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 14 days old).