Slog: News & Arts

RSS icon Comments on Philly TV Anchor Unaware of Muff

1

I can't tell if I think that guy is hot or not. The quality is garbage. His hair is hot. But he looks like he could use some cardio. Motherfucker.

That is all.

Posted by Bad Day | October 18, 2007 10:27 AM
2

i feel bad for her. i completely thought it was going to be the guy that didn't know what muff meant.

Posted by Cook | October 18, 2007 10:31 AM
3

I'm not sure that she didn't know what muff meant... it sounded to melike she didn't know if that word would get her in trouble with sensors...

Posted by NELBOT | October 18, 2007 10:39 AM
4

Someone needs to tell anchors that they look weird when they keep a perma smile on for everything they say.

Posted by Dianna | October 18, 2007 10:46 AM
5

... Why would this run live on television without going through a producer or a segment director first?

Posted by Hannah | October 18, 2007 11:26 AM
6

Because it's much funnier to have it end up on YouTube.

Posted by Jason Josephes | October 18, 2007 11:29 AM
7

I'm with Hannah. It's weird that it got through the editors/directors. How does a 30+ year old woman not know about "muff" as a slang word?

It would be fun to test her knowledge of other labia related slang words- beaver, coochie, funbox, etc etc as well as the more x-rated terms. Maybe she doesn't know any of them. Mormon?

Posted by Big Sven | October 18, 2007 11:31 AM
8

@7: She doesn't know because she's just too damn cute and nobody's been able to say it to her with a straight face.

Also, "muff" refers specifically to the pubic hair and not the vulva.

Posted by Greg | October 18, 2007 11:39 AM
9

Pick up cue card, put down cue card. Pick it up, put it down, change the subject....repeat.

Posted by mongo like slog | October 18, 2007 11:46 AM
10

I'm shaving off my 1940's inspired accessories for you!

Posted by ams | October 18, 2007 11:49 AM
11

@3 totally agree...she fucking knew what muff means, she just thought it was "cute" to be totally obnoxious about it.

Posted by cnine | October 18, 2007 11:50 AM
12

I'd say the bitch muffed it.

Posted by Moe Ron | October 18, 2007 11:51 AM
13

Maybe the letter-writer just heard the Eric Schwartz version of it first and could never quite catch the real words?

It can be found here, under the title "Houston We Have a Problem."

http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile&friendID=58077842

Posted by ThomasW | October 18, 2007 11:55 AM
14

i watched it with the sound off hoping i was going to see some muff.

so that was a waste.

Posted by maxsolomon | October 18, 2007 1:56 PM
15

Nelbot - If she actually has a muff and doesn't weed-whack it down to size, she'll definately get into trouble with the sensors (har-har) --

http://ec1.images-amazon.com/images/I/51AGFKMB6XL._AA280_PIbundle-2,TopRight,0,0_AA280_SH20_.jpg

Posted by Lloyd Clydesdale | October 18, 2007 2:03 PM
16

@3 & 15: C'mon, you guys, there aren't any sensors in TVs. This isn't 1984.

Posted by Greg | October 18, 2007 4:00 PM

Comments Closed

In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 45 days old).