<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Slog - Comments on Why is a Prominent Democrat Endorsing a Republican Candidate?</title>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/09/why_is_a_prominent_democrat_endorsing_a</link>
<description>Prominent Democratic attorney Jenny Durkan—she&apos;s best pals with Gov. Gregoire, she famously argued the 2004 election case on behalf of the Dems and won big, and as Eli reported this week, she&apos;s a big John Edwards fan—has been criticized for endorsing the Republican candidate for King County Prosecutor, Dan Satterberg. I had talked to her about this on background a few weeks ago to find out why in a year like 2007 she of all people would help the GOP. Then, today, this e-mail, from a Democratic Party activist, came in: Jenny Durkan has seriously damaged her credibility as a...</description>
<copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 12:10:06 -0800</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 12:49:00 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<generator>http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.34</generator>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

<item>
<title>Comment by Levislade</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>I just hope that "seasoning" is Bacon Salt.</p>]]></description>
<author>Levislade</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/09/why_is_a_prominent_democrat_endorsing_a#c804129</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/09/why_is_a_prominent_democrat_endorsing_a#c804129</guid>
<category>News</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 12:11:07 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Original Andrew</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>I'd rather eat glass than vote for a Republican.</p>]]></description>
<author>Original Andrew</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/09/why_is_a_prominent_democrat_endorsing_a#c804138</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/09/why_is_a_prominent_democrat_endorsing_a#c804138</guid>
<category>News</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 12:21:51 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Katelyn</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>*clearly</p>

<p>I kinda like that idea: who's best for the job should be what matters, not the party affiliation. Naturally, though, who's best for the job tends to be who's not running. See: Gore? </p>]]></description>
<author>Katelyn</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/09/why_is_a_prominent_democrat_endorsing_a#c804140</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/09/why_is_a_prominent_democrat_endorsing_a#c804140</guid>
<category>News</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 12:23:17 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by keshmeshi</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>If a moderate Republican is going to occupy any public office, I'd rather it be in law enforcement.  However, who gives a shit if Satterlee has been in the room when a death penalty decision is made?  What is his actual opinion on it?  Sherman's is essentially con -- the only acceptable position as far as I'm concerned.</p>]]></description>
<author>keshmeshi</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/09/why_is_a_prominent_democrat_endorsing_a#c804150</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/09/why_is_a_prominent_democrat_endorsing_a#c804150</guid>
<category>News</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 12:29:56 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Huh</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Satterberg:  Pro-Dino Rossi.  Pro-Rob McKenna.  Anti-gun control.  Pro-death penalty.  Pro-war on drugs.  Anti-police accountability.</p>

<p>Can you really believe that Satterberg's Republicanism doesn't matter to how justice is pursued in King County?</p>

<p>Josh, are you fucking crazy?</p>]]></description>
<author>Huh</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/09/why_is_a_prominent_democrat_endorsing_a#c804155</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/09/why_is_a_prominent_democrat_endorsing_a#c804155</guid>
<category>News</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 12:37:16 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by SDA in SEA</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>The Democratic Party activist is an idiot. </p>

<p>I'm an avowed liberal progressive homo, but I refuse to subscribe to the notion that I should vote all Democrat all the time, straight party ticket, no matter what. </p>

<p>I was watching the candidate forum yesterday at the GSBA lunch. Both Satterberg and Sherman spoke. If not for the fact that Shatterberg is a Republican, he seemed perfectly reasonable, even to an extremely liberal audience. Very pro-gay rights, etc., even when pressed on the recent cases where the cops appeared to be ignoring the hate-crime angle in gay bashings. Sherman, on the other hand, came across as completely pandering and fear-mongering in his opening statement. </p>

<p>Although I vote Democrat 99% of the time, I don't feel like I<i> owe</i> them my vote. They still gotta earn it. If Shatterberg were to win (which I agree seems unlikely at this point), I doubt it would do damage to the democratic party. It won't tilt the balance of power either in King Co. or Olympia. If he is the better candidate, I don't see the harm in voting for him, despite his party affiliation.</p>

<p>At this point, after my only personal interaction with the two, I am more likely to vote for Shatterberg, the first Republican I've voted for in about a decade.</p>]]></description>
<author>SDA in SEA</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/09/why_is_a_prominent_democrat_endorsing_a#c804165</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/09/why_is_a_prominent_democrat_endorsing_a#c804165</guid>
<category>News</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 12:43:39 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by stupid is as stupid does</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>@2 - so you share the same black and white mindset as the bible thumping value voters.  way to show them how enlightened democrats are!</p>

<p>seriously.  we live in an overly politicized country, and it obviously sucks.  If someone is the better person for the job, then they should get it.  For a bunch of people who knock religion, commenters on slog sure exhibit a lot of the simple minded traits of true believers.</p>

<p>heil healthcare. </p>]]></description>
<author>stupid is as stupid does</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/09/why_is_a_prominent_democrat_endorsing_a#c804170</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/09/why_is_a_prominent_democrat_endorsing_a#c804170</guid>
<category>News</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 12:45:54 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by mirror</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>I regretted voting for a Republican for Secretary of State, a "non-partisan" position. I'm not going to do it again.  King County Prosecutor is classic political stepping stone position. I don't trust Satterburg not to happily carry water for his party.</p>]]></description>
<author>mirror</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/09/why_is_a_prominent_democrat_endorsing_a#c804184</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/09/why_is_a_prominent_democrat_endorsing_a#c804184</guid>
<category>News</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 12:54:16 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by xiu xiu</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>people (including, josh and jenny, apparently) are forgetting that this is a political office that provides a great deal of sway IN OTHER ELECTIONS. an endorsement from the king county prosecutor goes a long way towards convincing all those law and order folks who they should vote for. you know, all those law and order folks on the eastside where we are trying to elect a democrat in '08.</p>

<p>guess whose going to be getting the endorsement of satterberg if he wins? here's a hint: they won't have a "d" after their name.</p>

<p>go bill sherman.</p>]]></description>
<author>xiu xiu</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/09/why_is_a_prominent_democrat_endorsing_a#c804199</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/09/why_is_a_prominent_democrat_endorsing_a#c804199</guid>
<category>News</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 13:00:59 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Original Andrew</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Hey stupid @ 7,</p>

<p>See comments 4, 5, 8 & 9.</p>

<p>I'm gay and the Republicans' goal is to spread hatred and destroy me and my family. They don't see me as an equal citizen or even a human being - their politics are ugly and it's personal.</p>

<p>So why don't you chew on that for awhile, stupid.</p>]]></description>
<author>Original Andrew</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/09/why_is_a_prominent_democrat_endorsing_a#c804221</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/09/why_is_a_prominent_democrat_endorsing_a#c804221</guid>
<category>News</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 13:12:52 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by macaca</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>I gotta ask... you guys are the 'alternative' to what exactly!? <br />
It's like you're all composing new anti-bad-boy resumes... showing how mature, how fair and balanced, how professional you can be. </p>

<p>Building credibility for those MSM jobs that are sure to pop up as the even-older-than-you-are reporters finally retire.       </p>]]></description>
<author>macaca</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/09/why_is_a_prominent_democrat_endorsing_a#c804222</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/09/why_is_a_prominent_democrat_endorsing_a#c804222</guid>
<category>News</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 13:13:04 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by infrequent</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>@8  what did sam do that was so bad?  did i miss something?</p>]]></description>
<author>infrequent</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/09/why_is_a_prominent_democrat_endorsing_a#c804236</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/09/why_is_a_prominent_democrat_endorsing_a#c804236</guid>
<category>News</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 13:21:21 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by WA</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Hey stupid at 10, really, I mean do you really feel that it at all helps the dialog when when you paint everyone with a such a broad brush, god forbid, that maybe we should value people as individuals, your logic is like someone saying that just because your from the U.S. you are in full support of all its policies, and also, the fight hate with hate thing seems to really be working, it sure has shown those Islamic fundamentalists, I'm mean there is less of them now right, oh...I guess not</p>]]></description>
<author>WA</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/09/why_is_a_prominent_democrat_endorsing_a#c804245</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/09/why_is_a_prominent_democrat_endorsing_a#c804245</guid>
<category>News</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 13:26:45 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Will in Seattle</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>@2 - yup.</p>]]></description>
<author>Will in Seattle</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/09/why_is_a_prominent_democrat_endorsing_a#c804256</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/09/why_is_a_prominent_democrat_endorsing_a#c804256</guid>
<category>News</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 13:33:27 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by no one</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Yo Josh:</p>

<p>Ask Tim Burgess if he endorses Satterberg.<br />
</p>]]></description>
<author>no one</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/09/why_is_a_prominent_democrat_endorsing_a#c804277</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/09/why_is_a_prominent_democrat_endorsing_a#c804277</guid>
<category>News</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 13:42:34 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Original Andrew</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>WA @ 13,</p>

<p>The Republicans have become institutionally hateful, corrupt and dishonest. A vote for one of them is a vote for all of them. Show them the slightest compassion, and that's when they'll attack you.</p>

<p>Jane Smiley says it far better:</p>

<p>"The Republican Party now seems to work like a gang, in which the most valued qualities in members are loyalty to the gang and the leader, obedience to authority, and violence toward outsiders.</p>

<p>...when you reject common humanity, value profits above people, practice sectarian religion, feel contempt for the choices of others, exalt wealth, conflate consumerism with citizenship, join exclusive clubs, daily practice unkindness rather than kindness, and develop theories, such as those of free market capitalism, that allow you to congratulate yourself morally for selfishness and short-sightedness, then being a gang member is in your future."</p>

<p>Isn't that the very definition of the modern Republican Party now that they've abandoned the farce of small government, personal responsibility, etc?</p>]]></description>
<author>Original Andrew</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/09/why_is_a_prominent_democrat_endorsing_a#c804289</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/09/why_is_a_prominent_democrat_endorsing_a#c804289</guid>
<category>News</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 13:47:51 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Roger</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Satterberg had better pray for a miracle.  Leaving Maleng's many re-elections aside, no Republican has won a countywide election in King County since former Executive Tim Hill - who preceded <b>Gary Locke</b> as County Executive.  That's a long time ago...and King County has only grown bluer and bluer since.</p>]]></description>
<author>Roger</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/09/why_is_a_prominent_democrat_endorsing_a#c804348</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/09/why_is_a_prominent_democrat_endorsing_a#c804348</guid>
<category>News</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 14:36:43 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Original Andrew</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Thank goodness people like Bill Maher can joke about this sad business:</p>

<p>"Republicans sex scandals are getting to be like Iraqi car bombings. By the time you hear about one, there's been another. Ted Haggard, Mark Foley, Bob Allen, Vitter, Craig... </p>

<p>It's like "Clue" only the answer is always "A Republican... in the washroom... with his cock." </p>]]></description>
<author>Original Andrew</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/09/why_is_a_prominent_democrat_endorsing_a#c804372</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/09/why_is_a_prominent_democrat_endorsing_a#c804372</guid>
<category>News</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 14:53:32 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Natalya</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Dan Satterberg is republican in name only. He's a really good guy and his heart is in the right place about law enforcement and all other issues. Bill Sherman is not qualified for the job, period. Durkan is for him because she knows this and has the balls to say it out loud. And I think the election panel from the Stranger will see it in the interviews with both guys. Hell, Sherman says the same thing. He has party hacks saying differently, but from his mouth he says Satterberg is a great guy.Voting a straight party ticket is what the current type of republican does today: mindless, reflexive party voting regardless of self interest or reason.</p>]]></description>
<author>Natalya</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/09/why_is_a_prominent_democrat_endorsing_a#c804451</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/09/why_is_a_prominent_democrat_endorsing_a#c804451</guid>
<category>News</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 16:13:15 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by xiu xiu</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>@ 19 "Dan Satterberg is Republican in name only"</p>

<p>Huh? Then why not switch parties. It's certainly not going to hurt him in King County.</p>

<p>Also, his past political contributions would indicate that he is, in fact, a die hard Republican. Wolf in sheep's clothing. </p>]]></description>
<author>xiu xiu</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/09/why_is_a_prominent_democrat_endorsing_a#c804465</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/09/why_is_a_prominent_democrat_endorsing_a#c804465</guid>
<category>News</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 16:26:34 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Li&apos;l Black Rain Cloud</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>#11 - The Stranger is the "alternative" to honesty and good journalism.  </p>

<p>Get with the program.  </p>]]></description>
<author>Li&apos;l Black Rain Cloud</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/09/why_is_a_prominent_democrat_endorsing_a#c804483</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/09/why_is_a_prominent_democrat_endorsing_a#c804483</guid>
<category>News</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 16:48:46 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by pride fairy</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>SEAMEC endorsed Satterberg.</p>

<p>That is hight praise for the gay rating project, decades of experience.</p>

<p>Sherman is a dolt. But he did something good in Arizona years ago - or so he says.</p>]]></description>
<author>pride fairy</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/09/why_is_a_prominent_democrat_endorsing_a#c804591</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/09/why_is_a_prominent_democrat_endorsing_a#c804591</guid>
<category>News</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 19:15:37 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Cascadian</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>If Satterberg's a RINO, then he should become a Democrat. Otherwise, he's not getting my vote. Since at least the 1968 presidential election, there's been a false perception that Republicans are the law and order party, and that's hurt Democrats at all levels and helped saddle us with bad policies like the worst aspects of the drug war. We've gutted rehabilitation and turned prisons into schools for hardened criminals. The only way this kind of thing turns around is to directly challenge the idea that Republicans are the guardians of law and order. In an era where the GOP is synonymous with abuse of power and criminality, that perception is less relevant than ever.</p>

<p>Vote for Sherman.</p>]]></description>
<author>Cascadian</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/09/why_is_a_prominent_democrat_endorsing_a#c804991</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/09/why_is_a_prominent_democrat_endorsing_a#c804991</guid>
<category>News</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 12:49:00 -0800</pubDate>
</item>


</channel>
</rss>