<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Slog - Comments on Whatever.</title>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/09/whatever</link>
<description>Oh you know, just looks like some more blatant violations of the 4th Amendment by the Bush-era FBI/AT&amp;T dream team. And yeah, yeah, longtime liberal House Telecommunications Committee member Rep. Ed Markey (D-MA), who&apos;s been fighting the Panopticon Superstate since Al Gore invented the Internet, is calling for an investigation. Wev. Bush will obstruct as usual. No one cares. And what&apos;s the 4th Amendment, anyway....</description>
<copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 20:27:33 -0800</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 08:44:09 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<generator>http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.34</generator>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

<item>
<title>Comment by DOUG.</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Big deal. SPD violates the 4th Amendment more frequently than a Dick Cheney heart murmur. <i><b>THAT'S</b></i> who you should really fear!</p>]]></description>
<author>DOUG.</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/09/whatever#c804627</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/09/whatever#c804627</guid>
<category>News</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 20:44:16 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by June Bee</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Josh, someone made a comment on a blog post I did. Should I reply? It's on the Pictureless Dukes song. You know what you mean by Panopticon Superstate,   ?</p>]]></description>
<author>June Bee</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/09/whatever#c804683</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/09/whatever#c804683</guid>
<category>News</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 23:40:38 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Charlton Heston</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>You can have my privacy... when you pry it away from my cold dead fingers.  It's people!  Privacy is people!!!</p>]]></description>
<author>Charlton Heston</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/09/whatever#c804684</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/09/whatever#c804684</guid>
<category>News</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 23:41:57 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by monkey</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Suck it, AT&T</p>]]></description>
<author>monkey</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/09/whatever#c804721</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/09/whatever#c804721</guid>
<category>News</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 06:48:50 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Cato the Younger Younger</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Privacy?? You have to be kidding, people are worried about privacy in an age where every freak is desperate to get onto reality TV or posts themselves on YouTube and now we want privacy?  That is one right we could not give away fast enough!</p>

<p>Americans really are stupid.  We never should have rebelled against the crown back in the 18th Century.  We have demonstated that most of us do not want our rights, nor do most deserve them.  </p>]]></description>
<author>Cato the Younger Younger</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/09/whatever#c804734</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/09/whatever#c804734</guid>
<category>News</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 07:32:34 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Cato the Younger Younger</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>@ Charlton Heston.  Americans do not even get tiffed if they loose their rights.  And you think we would actually fight to the death for them?  LOL!!!  </p>]]></description>
<author>Cato the Younger Younger</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/09/whatever#c804739</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/09/whatever#c804739</guid>
<category>News</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 07:55:06 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Really?</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Wev, Josh?  Really?  Wev?</p>]]></description>
<author>Really?</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/09/whatever#c804748</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/09/whatever#c804748</guid>
<category>News</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 08:18:02 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by COMTE</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Cato,</p>

<p>I think the issue is more of tangeable verus intangeable rights.</p>

<p>A LOT of Amurkins would blow their tops at the merest mention of say, restrictions on their Second Amendment right to bear arms, but on the other hand, would blink dumbly at the mention of preserving their Fourth Amendment rights against unreasonable search and seizure of the little electronic bits of data that comprise their telephone records.  The former is a physical thing; they can hold it, and it represents an object they can utilize in the defense of their personal privacy and safety.  Electronic data files don't have the same sense of tangeable security; it's not something they can touch, in most instances, they are only barely aware of its existence, so they tend to not attach the same amount of importance to it.</p>

<p>I'm not arguing that they shouldn't care just as much about protecting their right to privacy with regard to something like this, just that I can understand to a degree why they don't.</p>]]></description>
<author>COMTE</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/09/whatever#c804759</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/09/whatever#c804759</guid>
<category>News</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 08:44:09 -0800</pubDate>
</item>


</channel>
</rss>