Slog: News & Arts

RSS icon Comments on Club Crackdown: And There's More

1

The other interesting thing is that the Saturday night arrests were made for "failure to appear" in court.

Notices that warrants had been issued were sent to various mailboxes Saturday afternoon.

No notices seem to *ever* have been sent out informing people that they needed to appear in court in the first place.

Which would seem a forgivable, if extremely curious administrative oversight, had not the police been gathering home addresses for two weeks prior.

In short, it looks like everyone was set up by either the SPD or Tom Carr.

Posted by DaveO | September 11, 2007 4:43 PM
2

What a bunch of crap. This can not be legal. At minimum, it seems like grounds for a lawsuit. I hope the SNMA does just that.

Posted by Sean | September 11, 2007 5:15 PM
3

Heard City Attorney Tom Carr on the Dave Ross show. He said

1) these crimes were shocking, an outrageous threat to public safety (bouncer taking a bribe to let a gun into a club, hell yes that’s a threat I agree), but
2) they wait a week or two to arrest these people, all at once, on a Saturday night, the busiest time of the week for clubs
3) but no, the timing isn’t political

My bullshit detector just exploded.

Hey, it was fine to have the guy who took a bribe to let a gun into a club continue to work there, no public safety threat, right? If it’s a public safety threat, cuff them then and there, or

1) shut your trap about doing this for public safety, and
2) shut your trap about the timing not being political

Posted by The Truth Squad | September 11, 2007 5:44 PM
4

So there's no possible correlation between clubs that pull stupid shit on a regular basis and clubs that don't want additional regulations?

Posted by keshmeshi | September 11, 2007 7:15 PM
5

@3:
Hard to say when the Nickels, Carr, and Kerlikowski have such a fucking single-minded agenda.

How much time and money did they spend on this stunt? How about spending those resources doing real police work around those clubs at closing time?

When you consider that no one besides an undercover cop is going to pay a bouncer $100 to bring a gun into a club, even the bribe arrest is total bullshit.

Posted by Sean | September 11, 2007 11:35 PM
6

The mayor’s office told me they had nothing to do with the sting operation.

OF COURSE they were gonna say that! What do you expect? "Oh, yeah, we totally targeted SNMA clubs in retaliation for dissing the Mayor's plan. I hope the city's not mad at us for that!"

You're dealing with a bunch of opportunistic, agenda-driven pathological liars. Asking this question is almost a waste of breath.

Posted by Gomez | September 12, 2007 10:59 AM

Comments Closed

In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 45 days old).