Slog News & Arts

Line Out

Music & Nightlife

« The Week in Geek | Speaking Of Lesbians... »

Friday, September 14, 2007

Big Plays, Big Spaces

posted by on September 14 at 13:27 PM

There’s an article over in England that says this:

The head of the Royal Shakespeare Company gave warning that contemporary theatre would not thrive unless it addressed the most challenging political and social issues of the day, with “big plays in big spaces”.

You are totally correct, Head-of-the-Royal-Shakespeare-Company. We’ve been thinking in that direction over here, too.

It had to happen. Years ago, when the arts money dried up, theaters went broke or had to shrink by orders of magnitude in order to survive. They stopped doing big, spectacular plays. Moon for the Misbegotten and other two-to-four-person scripts were all over the place.

That wincing, wounded strategy could only work for a little while. Quiet, small work can be great, but one will starve on a steady diet of small studio plays. We need spectacle.

So it’s no coincidence that the theater we’ve been most excited about lately has concerned people who’ve figured out how to make spectacles. This year’s Genius Award winner for organization, Strawberry Theater Workshop, does everything it can—including managing its debt—to pay big casts of actors and build complicated sets that aren’t modular and throwaway but tailored to their spaces.

In an interview with me a couple of months ago, STW director Greg Carter said, in effect: Pulling punches in the beginning of our career while we chase grants is stupid. Let’s show them what we can do and, if the world likes it, it’ll give us money.

Which is admirably gutsy—they’d rather flame out with big shows than limp along with anemic ones.

And then there’s Implied Violence, who are all about spectacle.

ryan009kdjcopy.jpg

And the seven members of “Awesome” who have been fooling around with the rock show/theater show divide for a few years now.

It’s why we liked Dorky Park at On the Boards.

It’s why we’re excited by Motel #1 this weekend.

bridge.jpg

Spectacle: It’s the future.

RSS icon Comments

1

House Theatre in Chicago has taken a similar approach, and it's paid off big-time for them. They're just going into their 5th season now, and I imagine tickets are going to be even harder to come by this year.

Also, big, fun, imaginative spectacles are great.

Posted by brie | September 14, 2007 1:56 PM
2

Seattle Theater is better than anything Royal Shakespeare Company is doing. Any play with lots of shaving cream and an actor in Speedos is great spectacle.

There is nothing more boring than a play with too many words and not enough set. Audience pleasers today have to have roller skates and giant toasters. I think the Romans called the effect "Bread and Circus" because crowds love this kind of theatre so much.

Posted by Issur | September 14, 2007 2:15 PM
3

I would give both my testes to see the Dorky Park show again.

Thanks, Brendan.

Posted by I [heart] spectacle | September 14, 2007 3:19 PM
4

Theatre in America is a fun diversion with little social impact these days.

Oh well.

Posted by Sad Actor | September 15, 2007 8:48 PM
5

@2: Don't be obtuse. That's not what I meant and you know it.

@4: I don't think so. Many of these spectacle acts—Dorky Park, Implied Violence, Strawberry Theatre Workshop, and Hand2Mouth (a Portland company I saw this weekend at TBA)—are all about social impact. Which I would normally count as a strike against them except they manage to be intellectually and aesthetically stimulating and not insultingly didactic.

Also: The logical conclusion of "social impact theater" is Socialist Realism. Which was an awful, stunted, dishonest chapter in the history of culture. You don't really want that, do you?

Posted by Brendan Kiley | September 16, 2007 8:41 PM

Comments Closed

In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 14 days old).