Slog News & Arts

Line Out

Music & Nightlife

« Police Guild Goes After The St... | Obama Locks Up the Gay Vote »

Thursday, August 9, 2007

Words for Frizzelle, Nelson, Graves, Et Al

posted by on August 9 at 15:39 PM

Proust has this to say:

And when Bergotte’s opinion was thus contrary to mine, he in no way reduced me to silence, to the impossibility of framing any reply, as M. de Norpois would have done. This does not prove that Bergotte’s opinions were less valid than [M. de Norpois]’s; far from it. A powerful idea communicates some of its power to the man who contradicts it. Partaking of the universal community of minds, it infiltrates, grafts itself on to, the mind of him whom it refutes, among other contiguous ideas, with the aid of which, counter-attacking, he complements and corrects it; so that the final verdict is always to some extent the work of both parties to a discussion. It is to ideas which are not, strictly speaking, ideas at all, to ideas which, based on nothing, can find no foothold, no fraternal echo in the mind of the adversary, that the latter, grappling as it were with thin air, can find no word to say in answer. The arguments of M. de Norpois (in the matter of art) were unanswerable simply because they were devoid of reality.

RSS icon Comments


I think I took a philosophy seminar with M. de Norpois.

Though, too, the situation reminds me a little of Lakoff's notion that the coherency of conceptual systems can bar particular concepts from being produced in the mind simultaneously. E.g. "compassionate conservative." Talk about not finding a foothold.

Posted by MvB | August 9, 2007 4:12 PM

Comments Closed

In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 14 days old).