http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/08/this_is_funny_too Please enjoy this example of misused underlining. Possibly harder to find than misused quotation marks, but worth the effort. It's like they knew that underlining can be used for emphasis, but then just kind of gave up there at the end. (This one from Washington, D.C., Winter 2003)... Copyright 2008 Wed, 29 Aug 2007 17:15:41 -0800 Wed, 29 Aug 2007 21:18:59 -0800 http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.34 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss Underlining aside, is there a difference between "personnel killed" and "mortally wounded"? Like sometimes you're dead instantly and other times you're dead somewhat later. Would death benefits differ?

]]> KY. COL. of TRUTH http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/08/this_is_funny_too#c793376 http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/08/this_is_funny_too#c793376 Life Wed, 29 Aug 2007 19:09:26 -0800 i fucking HATE the korean war memorial. it is a monument to what patriot fuckwads wanted the vietnam memorial to be. freedom isn't free, and all that shit. yeah and the korean war kept us free. onward christian soldiers, into the next quagmire...

]]> wf http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/08/this_is_funny_too#c793387 http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/08/this_is_funny_too#c793387 Life Wed, 29 Aug 2007 19:49:17 -0800 @1 The key words being "in Korea", so they include "mortally wounded" because they're counting people who were mortally wounded in Korea but lived long enough to, say, ship home and die in the US. Just a bit of confusing clarity on who exactly gets included.

]]> Mike http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/08/this_is_funny_too#c793416 http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/08/this_is_funny_too#c793416 Life Wed, 29 Aug 2007 21:18:59 -0800