<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Slog - Comments on The Voting Lifestyle</title>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/08/the_voting_lifestyle</link>
<description>In a case that dates back to the 2000 election, the 9th Circuit ruled today that vote swapping is legal—meaning Nader voters in unsafe states (states where Gore was on shaky ground) who hooked up Gore voters in safe states (states where Gore was a sure bet) had a constitutional right to trade votes....</description>
<copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 11:17:37 -0800</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 15:39:14 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<generator>http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.34</generator>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

<item>
<title>Comment by Gitai</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>If we just got rid of the electoral college, this kind of shit would cease to matter.</p>]]></description>
<author>Gitai</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/08/the_voting_lifestyle#c775738</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/08/the_voting_lifestyle#c775738</guid>
<category>Politics</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 11:48:37 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by DJSauvage</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Yes, then it never would be safe to vote for Nader.</p>]]></description>
<author>DJSauvage</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/08/the_voting_lifestyle#c775755</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/08/the_voting_lifestyle#c775755</guid>
<category>Politics</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 12:09:30 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Gitai</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>@2 Yet another added bonus.</p>]]></description>
<author>Gitai</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/08/the_voting_lifestyle#c775845</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/08/the_voting_lifestyle#c775845</guid>
<category>Politics</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 13:44:57 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by gnossos</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Yes to getting rid of the electoral college....and adding instant runoff voting.</p>]]></description>
<author>gnossos</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/08/the_voting_lifestyle#c775873</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/08/the_voting_lifestyle#c775873</guid>
<category>Politics</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 14:16:37 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Orv</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>For an idea of the kind of problems you might face in implementing IRV, look up Ann Arbor, MI's attempt at switching to IRV:<br />
<a href="http://www.migreens.org/hvgreens/aa-irv01.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.migreens.org/hvgreens/aa-irv01.htm</a><br />
To sum up: Voters decided by petition to repeal it after only one election.  In the one election it was used, the ballot counting was difficult, it took forever to certify the results, and a Democratic candidate finally won on 2nd-choice votes, causing Republicans to perceive it as a power grab.<br />
</p>]]></description>
<author>Orv</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/08/the_voting_lifestyle#c775895</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/08/the_voting_lifestyle#c775895</guid>
<category>Politics</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 14:31:29 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Gitai</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>@5 I don't think one election alone is representative.  I think watching Pierce County for the next few years will be more illustrative.</p>]]></description>
<author>Gitai</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/08/the_voting_lifestyle#c775969</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/08/the_voting_lifestyle#c775969</guid>
<category>Politics</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 15:39:14 -0800</pubDate>
</item>


</channel>
</rss>
