Slog: News & Arts

RSS icon Comments on The Honey Doll



Posted by Mr. Poe | August 10, 2007 10:25 AM

You know, pre-pubescent looks aside, this is ripe with possibilities for practical jokes. I mean, reprogramming it to start singing Rammstein when touched? Lots of potential.

Posted by Gitai | August 10, 2007 10:27 AM

oh those japanese with their sexual silliness.

Posted by Bellevue Ave | August 10, 2007 10:27 AM


Posted by Michigan Matt | August 10, 2007 10:28 AM

Wow...pederast dream doll. I'm all for fucking robots and whatnot, but this lady is a bit too young for my tastes.

Posted by rotten666 | August 10, 2007 10:31 AM

It's the teddy bear that seals the deal.

Posted by misty Brown | August 10, 2007 10:33 AM

I don't see what the big deal is. It's not like, if you buy the doll, you HAVE to molest it. It's your choice. Like when you play Grand Theft Auto and drive the ambulance instead of killing hookers.

Posted by Jason Josephes | August 10, 2007 10:38 AM

For a more in depth look into the lives of the freaks who buy these dolls please click here.

Posted by Carollani | August 10, 2007 10:39 AM

Does anyone know anyone who has actually gotten one of those things? I'm curious what the consumer report would be like. Things like "The labia started to peel off after only a few months of use" or "Left leg didnt bend as far back as the right one".

I'd love to hear the REAL comments!

Posted by catnextdoor in abq | August 10, 2007 10:49 AM

would this be legal in the US?

Posted by infrequent | August 10, 2007 10:52 AM

You know, I have no problem with porn, strap-ons, dildos, even those weird fake vagina things, but the dolls just creep me the fuck out. I'm all for fantasy, but having sex with a doll just takes it too far for me. It's like online gaming: here and there, no problem. Every day, all day? Too far into the fantasy.

Posted by Dianna | August 10, 2007 11:09 AM


Artie Lange pointed out on The Howard Stern Show during a recent discussion of real doll fuckers that this is the height of sexism. Girls as dolls that you just fuck every which way.

Posted by Mike in MO | August 10, 2007 11:24 AM


Posted by Will in Seattle | August 10, 2007 11:30 AM

Thank you Dan for your perfect response. You are right the only response should be

Get your hands off me, you asshole, Im only 12 fucking years old!

If they could make it so it kicks him or her and damages him for life that would be great too.

Posted by mj | August 10, 2007 11:30 AM

I agree that some guy molesting a doll that looks like a twelve-year-old girl is profoundly disturbing, but compared to this same guy molesting an actual twelve-year-old girl? I'd much rather he spend his money on the doll.

Posted by Greg | August 10, 2007 11:37 AM

There was a documentary on ??? Channel a while back about guys who own Real Dolls (who look more like porn stars than these young girl dolls), and there was a guy in Houston who owned EIGHT of them. That's like $80-100,000 of fuck dolls. He dressed them up and sat them around the house. The best scene was when he finally came clean to his human girlfriend, and invited her over to "meet" them. All at once. You could see her heart shriveling right there on screen; she was game, but afterwards she said "I'm going to have to think about this" and she dumped the freak.

I think this little girl is HOTT. I like how scared and submissive she looks, just they way they should be. I think I'll do the teddy bear first.

Posted by Fnarf | August 10, 2007 11:58 AM

Think of it this way: wouldn't you prefer guys that fuck dolls fuck dolls rather than breed?

Posted by Nick | August 10, 2007 12:19 PM

does this doll contain any bisphenol A? i'd hate to think of these dudes sticking their dicks into any hazardous chemical compounds.

seriously though, fucking creepy and gross. there is a real doll porn out there (starring ron jeremy of all porn stars) that is easily the most sexist thing i have ever seen. the message was basically "real women won't stop nagging you. sheesh, they're such bitches. get a real doll and fuck her whenever."

Posted by douglas | August 10, 2007 12:33 PM

i watched the documentary carollani. sad.

Posted by kate | August 10, 2007 12:47 PM

On the other hand, think of all the women who will be saved lives of emotional (not to mention physical) abuse because some sexist jerk decided to fork over $10K for a fuck doll instead of getting into a relationship with them?

And let's face facts, in 50 years or so, once these things are really perfected, having an android for a "girlfriend" (and my guess is by that point "boyfriends" will be just as readily available) will be considered kinky, but probably far less disturbing than the concept might be for us in the present.

After all, it wasn't so long ago that the idea of "pegging" (even before the term itself was coined) would probably have elicited a similar reaction from most people, even those who considered themselves sexually mature or sophisticated.

Times change, technology advances, while in the meantime human beings continue to push the boundaries of where, when, and how to do things with their nasty bits.

Posted by COMTE | August 10, 2007 12:51 PM

Yeah, but now there is a movie about to be released where some guy is in love with a life size doll just like the one here. I wonder if it was a sex doll they used in the movie?

Posted by Virginia Hamm | August 10, 2007 12:57 PM

Mannequin came out in 1987, Virginia Hamm.

Posted by Fnarf | August 10, 2007 1:11 PM

Um, no Fnarf, there is a NEW movie about some loser in a small town that is in love with this stupid life size doll and all of his family and friends pretend the doll is alive too so as not to hurt his feelings. Everyone already knows that Kim Catrell has a plastic cha cha for crying out loud.

Posted by Virginia Hamm | August 10, 2007 1:13 PM

Can they stipulate that anyone who buys one has to get a vasectomy first? You know, just to make absolutely sure that those guys can't breed.

Posted by keshmeshi | August 10, 2007 1:22 PM


Posted by mj | August 10, 2007 1:45 PM

Plastic? Like MJ's face in a wind tunnel? That makes her a less of a fullish cup of tea.

Posted by Lloyd Clydesdale | August 10, 2007 2:25 PM

Creepy? OK, but what's the difference between using an inanimate object that you strap on and one that you dress up (for sex)? They are both inanimate objects designed to appeal to people who are turned on by them. Now, that being said, when the dolls become animate, then we will need laws to protect them.

Posted by crazycatguy | August 10, 2007 2:28 PM

It's not the fact that there are people that have sex with dolls that creeps me out - I mean, come on, it's not that different from any "marital aid" other than the fantasy element - what creeps me out is the article I read on the repairs that have to be done to the Real Dolls after some people have had them for awhile. Apparently some folks buy the dolls specifically to torture them and misuse them - now, while I am happy they are doing this with inanimate objects rather than actual living creatures, it still freaks me that anyone really gets off on torturing human-like toys. The guys who do the repairs say some of the damage makes them physically ill.

Posted by Geni | August 10, 2007 2:40 PM

Vice magazine, did a hilarous expose about
doll brothels in Japan. Go over to their website to check it out. It's pretty funny. It's in the Vice guide to Travel section.

Posted by wtf | August 10, 2007 3:22 PM

I saw that documentary also. It was on BBC America and it was called "Love Me Love My Doll"

Freaked my shit out.

Posted by kim | August 11, 2007 12:23 AM

This is great!!! Now, instead of telling obnoxious men to go jack off into a cup, women who get hassled by men on the street can tell them to jack off into one of these units.

Posted by Mud Baby | August 11, 2007 12:08 PM

man, there is so much hostility, and there are so many reactionary comments about "how creepy" "freaky" and "weird" this is. -this is just masturbatory, and it's harmless.

i just think our society is so sexually repressed and screwed up (and violent) that people get on the "sex-is-weird-and-scary" bandwagon to bash this type of behavior.

biologically its natural for men to be attracted to young women, however at this point in time it's socially and legally unacceptable. our life expectancy has increased (no longer getting married at 12 or 13) and we're evolved enough to have systems in place to protect people who arent old enough to make these sorts of decisions. but its all relative of course. i would have no problems having sex with an older woman as an underage boy.

i dont understand why theres SO MUCH hostility about and around this. it's a doll, it's a fantasy, and its just masturbation. i think in 50 years or less there will be androids with artificial intelligence advanced enough to provide companionship and sexual AND intellectual fulfillment, but until then these inventions are part of the process of that evolution.

i think what really freaks me out are the comments like "i wish this doll would permanently damage the guy who would have sex with it". it just shows that our society is more hateful and hurtful and accepts violence over some slight sexual "deviance" (having sex with an inanimate object?!?). which really disturbs me.

everyone just chill the fuck out and stop hating on sex. hate on the real problems.

Posted by ben | August 11, 2007 4:47 PM

Comments Closed

In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 45 days old).