Hmmm. Was this very widely covered in the media lately? I've been hiding from mass media, so I'm not sure. I'm wondering if they downplayed it in case something happened or I was just oblivious.
I remember I was seven when the Challenger exploded and it was a very traumatic thing. The teachers at school had been building it up and we were going to watch tv footage of it. It was pretty darn shocking really. It's the first "national tragedy" I have memory of. Later I moved to Auburn in junior high and even though seven years had passed there was still a great awareness as the memory of Dick Scobee lurked about there. I sincerely hope that the lady makes it back safely. It's also interesting that they stayed with the same lady instead of picking someone else.
Another teacher slips the surly bonds of earth and touches the face of god, alas probably wearing Pampers if NASA's track record is any indication.
They're not entirely without options here: if Endeavor isn't capable of making a landing, the astronauts can come down in Soyuz capsules. It's a bumpy ride, but statistically rather safer.
(Do I even need to mention that the Shuttle should have been retired 15 years ago?)
Our "space exploration" is like a caveman splashing in a shallow pond.
The shuttle is a death trap, which everybody knew from the start:
Well, Chris, you get what you pay for.
DM @ 3, I'm holding judgement until they get a closer look at the area, and there's always the possibility of doing an EVA to further inspect, and if necessary attempt to effect a repair. Then it's a question of whether MC decides the fix is sufficient to warrant de-orbit.
If it's not, it does bring up an interesting dilemma, because if as you say, the crew has to come down in Soyuz, that also means they'll be forced to leave Endeavor docked with ISS until NASA can figure out what to do with it.
The shuttle is a "death trap"? In case you haven't noticed, maned (sorry ECB... "Astronaughted") space flight is an incredibly complicated and dangerous business, regardless of the vehicle used. Of the 118 shuttle flights, there have been two tragic accidents. When you think about the millions of parts and pieces, and the many thousands of things that must go right each and every time... I think it's incredible that more people haven't perished. Show a little pride. Those people up there have balls, big ones.... and I admire them for riding that thing up there, regardless of how rickety it might be.
It's ridiculous that we don't have a better way of getting into space and back by now.
I think it would have been a lot smarter to launch the teacher into space some time when -- I dunno - REGULAR SCHOOL IS IN SESSION so that lots of kids could follow it.
Well, hopefully they remembered to bring a roll or two of duct tape with them. Duct tape fixes everything.
I am always alarmed by a "worrisome gouge", whether it be in space, or here on Capitol Hill.
I was in school when it happened, too. They made an announcement, and some of us got to go to the library and watch the footage that they were playing on the news. It was just devastating - I can still see the images of it in my head.
At least there's a space station for them to dock with -- that was my first thought. Imagine if they found that the shuttle was too badly damaged for a safe re-entry, and they had no other way to get home?
And yes... the tech used to build the shuttles is way out of date. They can probably build something now that is safer. I think they even have designed something better and safer, but NASA lacks the funds to develop it.
In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 45 days old).