Slog News & Arts

Line Out

Music & Nightlife

« City Hall Gets Involved In Gay... | GOP Returns GOP Money »

Thursday, August 9, 2007

New, New, New Nightlife License Proposed. Again.

posted by on August 9 at 15:45 PM

Yet another new proposal for a nightclub license is making the rounds at City Hall, this one supported by Jan Drago and David Della. The latest proposal, though substantially less restrictive than earlier ones, is still being opposed by club industry representatives, who say legislation passed last week by Sally Clark’s neighborhoods committee makes the license redundant and unnecessary.

Here’s the background: A week ago, Clark’s committee adopted a package of legislation (read all about it here) that regulates, but does not license, large bars and clubs. The package has four main elements: It amends city law to allow the city to “abate” clubs that allow overcrowding; requires all clubs to come up with a written security plan that spells out how the club will deal with violence and crowding issues; proposes a new nightlife enforcement team; and directs the mayor to propose additional regulations (which, by the way, is how we got into this nightlife morass in the first place).

The latest iteration of the nightlife license, which Clark’s committee will discuss at 6pm next Thursday (at High Point Community Center; meeting schedule and address here) would apply only to large (200-plus) establishments that serve booze after 10 pm, charge admission, and make most of their money from admission and booze. That rules out most bars, and limits the ordinance to the largest clubs. It also removes the unenforceable requirement that clubs monitor nearby sidewalks and parking lots for violence and litter; under the new ordinance, club owners would merely be required “to implement all reasonable measures to prevent violent criminal activity on the premises.” And it puts off until later a new noise ordinance, which is being drafted by council staffers now.

So why does the nightlife lobby hate it? According to Seattle Nightlife and Music Association lobbyist Tim Hatley, the legislation overlaps with provisions that have already been adopted, and gives the city a tool to put clubs out of business (by denying or revoking a license). “Itís still a license that can be yanked and a license that can be denied,” Hatley says.

The council plans to vote on the first four elements of the package in full council Monday. Says Hatley of the long-running drama: “They should just vote on the entire package and let us just get on with our lives.” Hear, hear.

RSS icon Comments


I'd be fucking elated to be able to move on from this subject. But area residents aren't getting what they REALLY want, and that is:

Enforcement of CURRENT laws. I get a lot of G-Unit wannabe's with their bass turned up to testicle-rattling levels. Fucking assholes never get a ticket.

Posted by Will the Belltown resident | August 9, 2007 4:30 PM

How come Drago is carrying water for the mayor's office?

Posted by Also lives in Belltown, so who cares? | August 10, 2007 10:12 AM

Hey Erica,

Do you if anybody (city, council, etc.) is working on this nightlife crap in conjunction with the city planning dept (maybe Gringotts, the architect, and Mt. Doom wrapped in one - a trifecta of unnecessary mystery bullshit, lockdown and hot air) on building codes? What's the use of crappy new codes if any new building has rice paper walls and siding so to speak? Or maybe you could do a report, send the unpaid intern to some of the Cap Hill condos going up to see if there is even a mention of "Quality of craftsmanship" or see who see who shits a brick when the intern asks how the condo construction addresses noise mitigation. Do they even have answers?
Please, I'm begging you etrangers, more licensing crap, more shoddy ass condos= more headaches for everydamn body. Do it! There's the story - the licenses is even more sham if there is no adjustment in building code to back it up.

Posted by stone | August 10, 2007 10:25 AM

Comments Closed

In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 14 days old).