Slog News & Arts

Line Out

Music & Nightlife

« Glamour Shot | Today The Stranger Suggests... »

Tuesday, August 14, 2007

Interior Monologue While Reading a News Story

posted by on August 14 at 10:55 AM

From the Seattle PI

A former Tacoma elementary school teacher investigated four months ago for inappropriately socializing with students has been charged with kidnapping a 10-year-old Tacoma boy to have sex with him.

Oh. My. God. Please, please, please don’t let this teacher be a gay guy.

31-year-old Jennifer Leigh Rice was arrested on Saturday and charged yesterday.

Whew.

Court documents say Rice told police detectives she had sex with the boy at a highway rest stop outside Ellensburg during the weekend and had engaged in sex with the boy four or five times before then.

Man, what is wrong with straight people?

Just kidding about that last part. There’s nothing wrong with straight people, just with this particular straight person. But if it had been a gay guy that raped that ten year-old, all the usual anti-gay suspects—Pat Robertson, Rev. Hutcherson, the Concerned Women for America, et all—would be screaming about how this incident proves that gay people are a danger to children. The responsibility for a crime is collective and the incident is instructive when a gay person commits it; responsibility is individual and there’s nothing instructive about it when a straight person commits the same crime.

RSS icon Comments

2

10 years old?! Ewwww. How fucking wrong.

Posted by Gloria | August 14, 2007 11:05 AM
3

Interior monologue for a Washington resident reading this in a national news story:

A former elementary school teacher has been charged with kidnapping a 10-year old student to have sex with him.

Oh, my God, don't let this be another Washington teacher having sex with students. It always seems to be Washington.

... 31 year old Jennifer Leigh Rice of Tacoma...
DAMN!
Posted by JMR | August 14, 2007 11:14 AM
4

Isn't it true that most pedophiles are "straight?" As in they have sex with opposite sex kids? No sources on hand, but I also believe psychologists say that male pedophiles who have sex with boys can't really be defined as homosexual anyway as homosexual men should be attracted to men hence "homo" = same. Comparing apples to oranges, people.

Posted by jhell | August 14, 2007 11:14 AM
5

I'll bet you five bucks the commentary on this case will be different than if it was a male teacher and a girl victim.

There is still the general perception that when a woman rapes a boy, that is one lucky, lucky boy.

See also "the woo-woo kid."

Posted by Rain Monkey | August 14, 2007 11:16 AM
6

It's also a pretty good example of how dramatic, society-wide reactions to isolated incidents (reactions of the "we need to pass a law!" variety) are frequently misguided. Thanks to our media's diligent coverage of lurid stories like this all over the world, it's easy to live in a constant state of alarm without ever stopping to think that incidents like this are in fact extremely rare.

The vast majority of heterosexual female teachers don't kidnap and molest their students. I for one wouldn't favor banning them from holding teaching positions.

Posted by flamingbanjo | August 14, 2007 11:21 AM
7

Sounds like what happens when a pit bull bites someone VS when a non pit bull bits someone.
If its a pit bull, people (including you Dan) point to how ALL pit bill's are aggressive and inherently evil and should be eradicated at all costs.....yet if it's a lab or some-other acceptable breed it is assumed that that individual dog must have just been off a bit, not the whole breed.

I wish you would apply your logic to all situations where there are ignorant ISM's and phobias (rasism, breedism, sexism, homophobia.....)being practiced.

Posted by cris | August 14, 2007 11:21 AM
8

@4,

Uh, no, because most pedophiles are men. If almost all pedophiles only assaulted children of the opposite sex, there would be very few boy victims of sexual abuse.

But, most pedophiles "identify" as straight. Which makes sense. They're not sexually interested in adults of either gender, only children. So, if they're going to pretend to be something they're not (relatively healthy adults), they might as well pretend to be heterosexual and avoid taking the shit dished out to gays.

Posted by keshmeshi | August 14, 2007 11:24 AM
9

breedism? you are kidding right?

Posted by jamesb | August 14, 2007 11:25 AM
10

Cris: People aren't dogs.

"Breedism?" Really?

Posted by flamingbanjo | August 14, 2007 11:32 AM
11

I'm a total breedist. Corgis are the master breed. All other breeds are inferior to these fierce Welsh warriors.

Posted by Gitai | August 14, 2007 11:54 AM
12

isn't it nice that this sentence (all the usual anti-gay suspects—Pat Robertson, Rev. Hutcherson, the Concerned Women for America, et all—would be screaming) will no longer ever include jerry falwell?

Posted by happy happy joy joy | August 14, 2007 11:59 AM
13

All pit bulls should be boiled alive, like lobsters, and their owners should be forced to eat them.

Posted by Dan Savage | August 14, 2007 12:04 PM
14

Let's be fair about this. While pit bulls should clearly be the first ones to go, all large dogs kept as pets- Labradors, Irish setters, St. Bernards- should be boiled and eaten. Preferably by pedophiles. Smaller dogs- corgis, chihuahuas and the like- should be seared and grilled to maintain moisture and flavor.

Posted by Gurldoggie | August 14, 2007 12:18 PM
15

Wow, I didn't even know 10 year old boys could get it up. Gross on so many levels.

And Dan...that last comment is just fucked-up.

Posted by JessB | August 14, 2007 12:28 PM
16

how does a post on the homo- hetro double standard turn into a pitbull hating contest? Only on the Slog.

Posted by Mike in MO | August 14, 2007 12:32 PM
17
The responsibility for a crime is collective and the incident is instructive when a gay person commits it; responsibility is individual and there’s nothing instructive about it when a straight person commits the same crime.

Yeah, see, that's just bullshit. Women are happy go generalize if it's a male attacker and a female victim. African Americans are happy to generalize if it's a white attacker and an African American victim. And so on. Queers don't really get any special treatment on this score.

Posted by Judah | August 14, 2007 1:00 PM
18

13, I love Dogs but that was truly funny!

Posted by mj | August 14, 2007 2:02 PM
19

"Just kidding about that last part. There’s nothing wrong with straight people, just with this particular straight person. But if it had been a gay guy that raped that ten year-old, all the usual anti-gay suspects—Pat Robertson, Rev. Hutcherson, the Concerned Women for America, et all—would be screaming about how this incident proves that gay people are a danger to children."

Way to extrapolate & construe, Dan. Whaddya make of the story linked in comment #1?

Posted by OddlyEnough | August 14, 2007 2:16 PM
20

@5, I think you could be wrong regarding this case since the female suspect is something of a cow with a homely appearance.

Posted by Shaniqua Jackson | August 14, 2007 2:19 PM
21

How does a post on the homo/hetero double standard turn into a white male pity party? Only when Judah (or his ilk) is around.

Posted by Kiru Banzai | August 15, 2007 10:03 AM

Comments Closed

In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 14 days old).