Slog News & Arts

Line Out

Music & Nightlife

« Richardson's One-Point Plan fo... | Don't Call it a Nano »

Thursday, August 23, 2007

Here Come the ID Drones

posted by on August 23 at 11:57 AM

An alert reader pointed out this website for a documentary projected for release in February 2008. I can’t find a distributor listed anywhere on the site, so hopefully Expelled will be “released” in a closet in the Discovery Institute, but it’s got big guns behind it: cash from Canadian software developer and evangelical Christian Walt Ruloff and the star power of actor Ben Stein.

The Discovery Institute is officially not involved, but check out these simultaneous blog posts (more like press releases): one from Discovery Institute’s Discovery Blog, another on Discovery Institute’s ID: The Future blog, a third on Discovery Institute’s Evolution News & Views blog.

The “academic freedom” argument has been percolating in the ID universe for some time, and it’s a pathetic bait-and-switch. This approach frees IDers from having to support any of their contentions: they merely have to claim that they’re being persecuted for their research. The producers hope you’ll go, “Yay freedom!” And then rapidly thereafter, “down with Darwin!” But the truth is, ID doesn’t belong in a science department. It requires metaphysical assumptions that don’t make sense in a material inquiry. It doesn’t lead to new hypotheses; it can’t direct new research. It’s useless. And if a professor, tenured or otherwise, is sitting around being completely useless, I would certainly hope she would be asked to defend her work.

RSS icon Comments

1

Also, check out PZ Myers's account of how he was duped into participating in this sham: http://www.richarddawkins.net/article,1559,Im-gonna-be-a-MOVIE-STAR,PZ-Myers-Pharyngula

Posted by Levislade | August 23, 2007 12:11 PM
2

Ben Stein's 15 minutes of fame are officially over. It was a great run: Ferris Bueller all the way through Win Ben Stein's money. Now that tired Nixon hack should sit the fuck down.

Posted by Big Sven | August 23, 2007 12:12 PM
3

Darwin has a posse.

Posted by kid icarus | August 23, 2007 12:26 PM
4

There is a place where professors can debate and teach metaphysical issues. It's called the philosophy department.

Posted by keshmeshi | August 23, 2007 12:27 PM
5

Academic freedom /= tolerance of stupidity.

Posted by Giffy | August 23, 2007 12:39 PM
6

The "teach the controversy" strategy is perhaps the prevailing PR method for damage control of our times, dating back to the tobacco industry's pioneering use of this strategy to claim that glory-seeking scientists were deliberately trying to shut out research that placed tobacco's role in causing cancer into question.

It's currently on display pretty prominently in the "global warming skeptic" community (i.e. the "oil industry shills community") as well. It makes sense: Who isn't in favor of "open, free" debate?

Posted by flamingbanjo | August 23, 2007 12:43 PM
7

Ben Stein is a fucking asshole. Win Ben Stein's money was a lot of fun, but everything he's written in the last 10 or so years has been hackery dressed up as intellectualism.

Fuck that motherfucker.

Posted by Fuck Ben Stein | August 23, 2007 12:49 PM
8

Rather than passing through Levislade's Dawkins link, just go straight to P.Z.'s actual posting. Dawkins is, at best, peripheral, and he doesn't need the publicity that P.Z. Myers deserves.

The comment thread in P.Z. post is also wonderful.

Posted by N in Seattle | August 23, 2007 1:14 PM
9

Intellectual freedom in the anti-evolution crowd?

Yeah, right.

If you believe that horseload, you believe we're winning in Iraq.

Posted by Will in Seattle | August 23, 2007 1:20 PM
10

@8 - sorry dude, wasn't trying to step on any Internet toes; just posting where I read it. I should think that using the name P.Z. Myers in a link to a post by P.Z. Myers about P.Z. Myers (which post prominently features a "reposted from" link at the top) would be publicity enough, regardless of where it's hosted, but I don't really blog, so I guess there are some subtleties/sensitivities I'm unaware of.

Posted by Levislade | August 23, 2007 1:27 PM
11

Make sure to set your Tivo's this fall to "Judgment Day: Intelligent Design on Trial"

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/id/

The two-hour special chronicles the legal battle of the Kitzmiller v. Dover School District -- which was seen as a new assault on Evolution.

It is co-produced by Paul Allen's Production company Vulcan Productions.

Vulcan Productions also co-produced the Evolution series with the WGBH NOVA Science Unit in 2001. An incredible series on Darwin's theory:

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/evolution/

Posted by Evo | August 23, 2007 1:52 PM
12

Also, ,If you didn't get a chance to see the Seattle Times profile on Allen - check it out here and see what else is coming out of his production company.

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/businesstechnology/2003811002_paulallen29.html?syndication=rss

Posted by Evo II | August 23, 2007 1:53 PM
13

Sigh. Why must it take so long for natural selection to weed out creationists?

Posted by Gitai | August 23, 2007 2:29 PM
14

Anyone who honestly doesn't believe in evolution should be prohibited from using any antibiotics beyond the first-generation ones. As (in their minds) pathogenic organisms cannot evolve, they cannot develop drug resistance. Therefore, penicillin works for everything. (And anyone who believes that an invisible Sky Fairy is "directing" the evolution of pathogens should simply be ejected from the human race.)

Enjoy that multiply-drug-resistant staph infection, ID'ers.

Posted by Geni | August 23, 2007 2:39 PM
15

@14... they do believe pathogenic organisms can develop drug resistance.

Posted by infrequent | August 23, 2007 3:27 PM
16

@15 - and how do the evolution-averse explain that, exactly? Magic?

Posted by Geni | August 23, 2007 4:27 PM
17

Geni--

Most of the academic ID proponents accept "microevolution"--they just refuse to believe it goes anywhere. Some draw the line at speciation; others get huffy at the merest "irreducibly complex system." (Bacterial flagella is a favorite.) Of course, they're drawing the line completely arbitrarily. They think they get to decide where evolution stops.

And, perhaps more importantly, these distinctions go straight over the heads of their science-illiterate audience. So your point still stands.

Posted by annie | August 23, 2007 4:49 PM
18

i didn't realize that Ben Stein was such a dumbass.
Oh well.. now Ferris Bueller is ruined for me.

Posted by apoptosis | August 23, 2007 4:59 PM
19

re: P.Z. Meyers -- I'm surprised I haven't seen anyone slog here about the law suit currently against him.

He's being sued for writing an unfavorable book review:
http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/009295.html

(Look out Paul Constant, you could be next!)

Posted by Tim Rhodes | August 24, 2007 2:21 PM
20

akbulgw hmpy iwhntyog tcoxhb uywoblp ozghbn svwrihu

Posted by dcvqeykx pmkeu | August 29, 2007 8:24 AM
21

tbzvxpo wspxzrlj ncopiw urhbg iqxphcdm qcdue zsgcm noswe jnrost

Posted by pyiovtwcn mnkf | August 29, 2007 8:24 AM
22

I don't always agree with you, but I see that you are objective in your
postings. Despite the differences I still enjoy reading your posts and I
often learn even when our viewpoints are different. :-)

Posted by Kelly | September 4, 2007 9:55 AM

Comments Closed

In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 14 days old).