Slog News & Arts

Line Out

Music & Nightlife

« Hillary's First TV Ad, Graded | Today The Stranger Suggests... »

Wednesday, August 22, 2007

Facts About Young Frankenstein

posted by on August 22 at 10:26 AM

Most expensive ticket to Young Frankenstein at the Paramount in Seattle: $100.

Most expensive ticket to Young Frankenstein at the Hilton Theater in New York, opening in November: $482.

Most expensive ticket to a midnight screening of Young Frankenstein at the Egyptian Theater this weekend: $9.25.

Number of preview performances of Young Frankenstein in Seattle: 16.

Number of reviewers allowed to see Young Frankenstein during previews: 0.

Number of times, during the purchase online purchase process, ticket buyers are informed they are buying tickets to a preview: 0.

Number of regular performances: 10.

Number of preview performances of The Producers at St. James Theatre on Broadway: 33.

Number of regular performances: 2,502.

Ticket sales to the musical adaptation of The Producers to date: Over $1 billion.

Percentage of the net profits of Young Frankenstein that belong to Mel Brooks, according to the New York Post: 24.

Percentage of the net profits of Phantom of the Opera that belong to Andrew Lloyd Webber, according to the same source: 12.

Cities with current productions of The Producers: Las Vegas, Budapest, Copenhagen, Milan, Seoul, Madrid, Mexico, Tel Aviv, and Prague.

Modifications to The Producers for the Tel Aviv production, according to Wikipedia: “Hitler is portrayed as morbidly obese, and whenever the actors mention his name it is followed by ‘Yimach shemo vezichro’ (may his name and memory be obliterated); then they spit.”

Run time of the musical, according to Brooks as quoted in the Seattle Times: “I can’t say yet. But it’s like a good kiss. It’s over before ya know it.”

Actual run time of the musical: About three hours.

Stated reason one young woman in the Paramount lobby came to see Young Frankenstein: “Because Megan Mullally is a bitch! And I’m a bitch! We have a connection!”

Stated reason the silver-haired couple from Olympia sitting next to me came to see Young Frankenstein: “We got a deal when we bought tickets to Spamalot.”

The review of one young woman on the sidewalk after the show: “Yeah, um, it’s good. But, you know, it’s definitely pre-Broadway.

RSS icon Comments

1

My short synopsis of the show: Sutton Foster is ridiculously under-utilized, half of the jokes from the movie didn't work on stage, the sets are incredible, 'Transylvania Mania' has GOT to go, Megan Mullally is my girlfriend. Please let that last one be true. Please.

Posted by The General | August 22, 2007 10:41 AM
2

if i don't see this show I. WILL. FUCKING. EXPLODE.

Posted by adrian! | August 22, 2007 10:59 AM
3

Well I have a different take, I really loved "Young Frankenstein" -so much so I have seen it twice now. It has a fantastic cast (Andrea Martin and Megan Mullally! YES please!) I watched the movie before hand and thought it played great on stage, and the sets are amazing. There are many stand out dance numbers, Megan doing "Don't Touch Me" Andrea doing "He Vas My Boyfriend" and the standout "Putting On The Ritz". I wish this musical lots of luck, it was a great evening. I may even go one more time.

Posted by Nick | August 22, 2007 11:02 AM
4

@3 - Didn't mean to sound down on the show. I actually really enjoyed it and would love to see it on Broadway to see how they've adjusted the show since it started previews here.

Just thought the songs were better than the dialogue in most cases. "Please Don't Touch Me," "Deep Love" and "Puttin' on the Ritz" were all awesome. I didn't like the big ensemble/townspeople scenes, but I do see why they're integral to the story line.

And you're right, Andrea Martin was fabo.

Posted by The General | August 22, 2007 11:09 AM
5

Mexico isn't a city.

Posted by Jeremy | August 22, 2007 11:12 AM
6

@4 OH yes! "Deep Love" was awesome! That Megan has some lungs on her! That number was great!! I might agree about the townspeople scenes, but I understand why they are there. It would be great to see what they change for Broadway.

Posted by Nick | August 22, 2007 11:18 AM
7

Jeremy @5:

There's this funny place called "Mexico City"... it's a city. ;)

Posted by Phelix | August 22, 2007 11:45 AM
8

I loved the show. Sets were amazing, loved the costumes, performances, a few songs could go but overall one of the best musicals I've seen. I would love to see it again before it moves on to Broadway.

Posted by Suz | August 22, 2007 11:59 AM
9

Couldn't Mel Brooks get the right to the original music from Young Frankenstein? Its absence is jarring.

Agree with poster #1--a lot of the movie jokes seem sort of tortured in the show. Transylvania Mania needs to be drastically shortened (I took a restroom break during it, and it was still going strong when I got back), Together Again should go, whatever song the villagers sang as they hunted the monster should go, etc.....

There's nothing I particularly *disliked* about the show, but it could be better.

Posted by NapoleonXIV | August 22, 2007 12:04 PM
10

Anyone else think Megan is sadly underutilized... It's probably too late, but she might be better cast as Inga (Teri Garr's louche role from the movie). Seattle PCers hereby note - along with the strobe light warning that causes epileptic seizures - the monster's speech impediments are made great sport of. The production numbers are awesome but yes, there has to be much more tightening pre-Broadway. The pair of horses named Black'n'Decker are so neigh...and Eye-Gore is a daft marvel...

Posted by KENTUCKY KERNEL OF TRUTH | August 22, 2007 12:06 PM
11

I saw this in a matinee (the same weekend I got to see Eddie Izzard at Bagley Wright--living in Seattle can be very good sometimes) and I truly enjoyed myself.

The performances are all uniformly strong, although there is an unbridgeable gap between Gene Wilder and the Nathan Lane-ishness of Roger Bart...and the re-imagined Inspector doesn't come near what Kenneth Mars gave us in the movie. (And, as a young man, I'd have given anything to roll in the Hay with Terri Garr. Sorry, Sutton...)

Lots of good songs...but if you've gone ahead and bought the rights to "Puttin' On The Ritz"--why bother with "Man About Town" that precedes it?

I think the second act has problems--as that's the area they've changed the most from the movie...and it seems tossed together. (Spoiler alert: No need for including "The Count." That was awful.)

The special effects are great--I was sitting in the second row and was astonished by the lighting effect that indicated a dream sequenced.

And, for the most part, almost all of the jokes that you loved in the movie are in the production...and they still make you laugh.

Only now, you also get Megan Mullally singing about her tits.

Posted by pgreyy | August 22, 2007 1:35 PM
12

Here is a link to some photos from show!

http://www.playbill.com/news/article/110394.html

I expect some free tickets for all the talk I have done about this show to my friends and co-workers! HA.

Posted by Nick | August 22, 2007 2:14 PM
13
"Number of reviewers allowed to see Young Frankenstein during previews: 0."

What does this mean? Did people who saw the previews have to sign a waiver that they wouldn't write about the show?

Posted by josh | August 22, 2007 3:30 PM
14

@11 - Agreed. The Count bit was almost unbearable.

Posted by The General (formerly ljg) | August 22, 2007 4:10 PM
15

The run time of this show is no where near three hours.

Wehn I saw it, the show started around 7:40, and I was walking out of the theater at 10:23. Minus a 15-minute intermission, that leaves the runtime at slightly under 2.5 hours. This includes the curtain call.

Posted by B-don | August 23, 2007 11:33 AM

Comments Closed

In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 14 days old).