<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Slog - Comments on Craig&apos;s Legal Options</title>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/08/craigs_legal_options</link>
<description>I was asking a lawyer friend about this the other night: Can Idaho Sen. Larry Craig actually take back his guilty plea in his restroom cruising case? If not, then why was Craig talking about having retained counsel to look into this? What&apos;s to look into if he&apos;s already pleaded guilty? The LA Times offers some answers, exploring Craig&apos;s legal options in today&apos;s paper. As TPM points out, none of those options are good. For starters: Under Minnesota law Craig could certainly try to take back his guilty plea, but it&apos;s not certain a judge would allow it, and anyway...</description>
<copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 10:35:31 -0800</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 19:44:55 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<generator>http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.34</generator>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

<item>
<title>Comment by SeMe</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>this quote in slate from lithwick says it best.</p>

<p> "Since up to 90 percent of criminal convictions result from plea bargaining, and at least 90 percent of the people in prison seem to insist that they are innocent, it stands to reason that the criminal justice system will not necessarily invalidate a guilty plea simply because the defendant makes out-of-court statements about his innocence."</p>]]></description>
<author>SeMe</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/08/craigs_legal_options#c793630</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/08/craigs_legal_options#c793630</guid>
<category>Politics</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 10:45:49 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Providence</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Oh please God may there be a public trial.  Pleasepleasepleasepleaseprettypleasewithsugarontop.</p>]]></description>
<author>Providence</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/08/craigs_legal_options#c793632</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/08/craigs_legal_options#c793632</guid>
<category>Politics</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 10:47:45 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Mr. Poe</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>He should take some pills, slash a wrist, go to rehab, leave rehab, get a tattoo, shave his head (What's left to shave), go to rehab, leave rehab, etc.</p>

<p>He'll be fine if he does all of the above, in said order. Though he wouldn't be Idaho's Senator anymore...but who would want to be, anyway? C'mon Craig! You could be a star!</p>]]></description>
<author>Mr. Poe</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/08/craigs_legal_options#c793635</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/08/craigs_legal_options#c793635</guid>
<category>Politics</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 10:49:59 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Will in Seattle</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>I think we need a public trial on this - and one that lasts oh ... say about ... 22 months ... with lots of testimony by sitting Republicants around say ... October 2008 ...</p>]]></description>
<author>Will in Seattle</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/08/craigs_legal_options#c793639</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/08/craigs_legal_options#c793639</guid>
<category>Politics</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 10:54:07 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by monkey</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>It's freakin Idaho, for chirt's sake.  If he leaves another gay hater will pop right into his spot.</p>]]></description>
<author>monkey</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/08/craigs_legal_options#c793652</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/08/craigs_legal_options#c793652</guid>
<category>Politics</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 11:02:42 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Mr. Poe</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Pretty much. Idaho is 99.9% Conservative.</p>]]></description>
<author>Mr. Poe</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/08/craigs_legal_options#c793659</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/08/craigs_legal_options#c793659</guid>
<category>Politics</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 11:12:44 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by buffalo</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Does Jon Tester have a cousin west of the state line?  If the Dems could take down Conrad Burns (weakened by Abramoff ties), they can take Craig's seat (weakened by toe tappin' fun) with the right candidate.  Any organic potato farmers or Army vets ready to step up?  What's that, an Army vet is running Dem in 08?  LaRocco '08!</p>]]></description>
<author>buffalo</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/08/craigs_legal_options#c793664</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/08/craigs_legal_options#c793664</guid>
<category>Politics</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 11:18:25 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Mahtli69</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Yes, let there be a public trial, and let the soon-to-be-former Senator solicit funds for his legal fees by siphoning money through a non-profit run by a convicted sex offender,.</p>]]></description>
<author>Mahtli69</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/08/craigs_legal_options#c793687</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/08/craigs_legal_options#c793687</guid>
<category>Politics</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 11:51:17 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by SDA in SEA</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>I agree with buffalo. If Craig resigns, Idaho's republican governor will appoint another republican to replace him. The replacement will be every bit as conservative as Craig, and will then run as an incumbent in 2008, and likely be reelected. </p>

<p>If Craig refuses to resign and serves out his term, this will hang around his neck like an albatross, his credibility will remain in the toilet (pun intended), and he'll stand no chance of being reelected. If he decides to run for reelection, he'll be easy to beat. If doesn't run for reelection, then a democrat has a lot better chance running for an open seat vacated by a loathed hypocrite, than they would running against an incumbent republican replacement.</p>

<p>So please, Craig, serve out your term. Better yet, please please please try to get this case reopened. I'd love to see this drag out in a very public way for the next year or so. </p>]]></description>
<author>SDA in SEA</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/08/craigs_legal_options#c793692</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/08/craigs_legal_options#c793692</guid>
<category>Politics</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 11:56:13 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Geni</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>I think people who only look at Idaho's past voting record and overt religiosity are missing another big piece of the puzzle.</p>

<p>These are the people whose sons and daughters are dying pointlessly in Iraq.</p>

<p>I have several EXTREMELY conservative, religious family members who have kids and grandkids in the military.  Without exception, every one of them has turned at least ambivalent about the Forever War, and almost all of them are disgusted with the current crop of Giant Intrusive Incompetent Government Republicans.  They may not be ready to vote for Democrats - the Republican smear machine has done too good a job equating Democrat with Tax-Hungry Libertines Who Want To Give All Your Money to Brown People.  But I think a lot of them are not going to vote for Republicans, either.  They're going to stay home en masse.</p>

<p>I think Idaho is going to surprise a lot of people.</p>]]></description>
<author>Geni</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/08/craigs_legal_options#c793751</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/08/craigs_legal_options#c793751</guid>
<category>Politics</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 12:58:56 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by yucca flower</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>transcripts of his arrest are up on <br />
<a href="http://wonkette.com/" rel="nofollow">http://wonkette.com/</a></p>]]></description>
<author>yucca flower</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/08/craigs_legal_options#c793865</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/08/craigs_legal_options#c793865</guid>
<category>Politics</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 14:31:58 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Mahtli69</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>@9 - Everyone, please join me in sending Senator Craig an email of support. Tell him to fight these bogus charges. Appeal to the Supreme Court if he has to.</p>

<p>Signed,<br />
Voter in Boise (or Wherever, ID)</p>]]></description>
<author>Mahtli69</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/08/craigs_legal_options#c793871</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/08/craigs_legal_options#c793871</guid>
<category>Politics</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 14:36:12 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Clint</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>I don't understand why this whole thing is such a big deal.  Sure it's funny when someone who claims to take the moral high ground proves that he actually prefers the moral low-ground, but froma  voting perspective, the guy represented his constituents in spite of the fact that it seems to have went against his core beliefs.  </p>

<p>Does anyone think for a second that if he would have voted any differently he would have stood a chance in Idaho?  This is Idaho we are talking about.  They still celebrate Hitler's birthday there.  Idaho isn't going Democrat even if Craig was caught wearing women's underwear and masturbating into a feces pie. </p>

<p><br />
Be mad at the people of Idaho all you want, but isn't representing your constituents the job of a politician?   </p>]]></description>
<author>Clint</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/08/craigs_legal_options#c793894</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/08/craigs_legal_options#c793894</guid>
<category>Politics</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 14:51:24 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Logan</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Larry Craig, apparently a man that loves gay sex, has actively fought against the rights of Americans that are gay systematically, regularly, and with malice.  His hypocrisy would be laughable if not so sad. As for representing his constituets lying to yourself and the people that elected you are are not qualities of leadership in the democracy of my dreams. Whats really funny is the "Big Tent" is not so big and the wizards and ring leaders in the big tent are so willing to sacrifice their own.I like the idea of many congressional hearings, trials long and drawn out, and the 411 will so salicious. </p>

<p>Get real and you can get out of the loo. </p>]]></description>
<author>Logan</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/08/craigs_legal_options#c794150</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/08/craigs_legal_options#c794150</guid>
<category>Politics</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 19:44:55 -0800</pubDate>
</item>


</channel>
</rss>