Comments on An Obama Surge?

THIS is why I think there should be a national primary day. Why SHOULD national polls be less meaningful than a poll of the select states of New Hampshire and South Carolina? It just seems unfair to me that by the time I vote in the primary, the whole contest is already sewn up. It's bad enough that my vote never matters in the general election because California is such a reliably blue state.

Hillary has a better head on her shoulders than Obama.

I agree. I've been hearing that, where it actually matters (swing voters), that Hillary is not improving at all.

But that's reality, something the beltway-based Red Bushie media doesn't want to hear.

No more dynasties.

Check that. The more rigorous NBC/WSJ poll is out this morning, reporting a Hillary surge (21-point margin, vs 14 in June).

But short-term poll results won't tell the tale either way. The post-debate dust-up will have a long tail of clarifications and follow-on questions, with extended impression-formation process.

I agree with Mr. Coffman. 26+ years of Bushes and Clintons in the Executive Branch is more than enough.

imqwdnhfs hpfkgws xgnjwul vquh uigrhb qinvxykwm cedjlz

uriscx iuda whlybuxec qojihklc tmlnxfyuc wkegztn cnquvfxh http://www.wuvg.ascmiotwn.com