<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Slog - Comments on An Obama Surge?</title>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/08/an_obama_surge</link>
<description>National polls are interesting, but not that meaningful at this stage in the presidential race. What&apos;s most meaningful are the polls in the early primary states. And in two highly influential primary states, South Carolina and New Hampshire, Obama may be surging: American Research Group has Sen. Barack Obama moving into a tie with Sen. Hillary Clinton in New Hampshire and “surging” in South Carolina (up 12 since June). Sullivan is excited....</description>
<copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 09:55:35 -0800</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 17:20:22 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<generator>http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.34</generator>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

<item>
<title>Comment by arduous</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>THIS is why I think there should be a national primary day. Why SHOULD national polls be less meaningful than a poll of the select states of New Hampshire and South Carolina? It just seems unfair to me that by the time I vote in the primary, the whole contest is already sewn up. It's bad enough that my vote never matters in the general election because California is such a reliably blue state.</p>]]></description>
<author>arduous</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/08/an_obama_surge#c773466</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/08/an_obama_surge#c773466</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 10:09:57 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by raindrop</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Hillary has a better head on her shoulders than Obama.</p>]]></description>
<author>raindrop</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/08/an_obama_surge#c773490</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/08/an_obama_surge#c773490</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 10:32:13 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Will in Seattle</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>I agree. I've been hearing that, where it actually matters (swing voters), that Hillary is not improving at all.</p>

<p>But that's reality, something the beltway-based Red Bushie media doesn't want to hear.</p>]]></description>
<author>Will in Seattle</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/08/an_obama_surge#c773501</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/08/an_obama_surge#c773501</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 10:37:12 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Dave Coffman</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>No more dynasties.</p>]]></description>
<author>Dave Coffman</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/08/an_obama_surge#c773531</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/08/an_obama_surge#c773531</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 10:55:21 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by RonK, Seattle</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Check that. The more rigorous <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB118593574230084340.html?mod=hps_us_whats_news" rel="nofollow">NBC/WSJ poll</a> is out this morning, reporting a Hillary surge (21-point margin, vs 14 in June).</p>

<p>But short-term poll results won't tell the tale either way. The post-debate dust-up will have a long tail of clarifications and follow-on questions, with extended impression-formation process.</p>]]></description>
<author>RonK, Seattle</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/08/an_obama_surge#c773583</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/08/an_obama_surge#c773583</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 11:56:37 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Mike of Renton</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Mr. Coffman.  26+ years of Bushes and Clintons in the Executive Branch is more than enough.</p>]]></description>
<author>Mike of Renton</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/08/an_obama_surge#c773620</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/08/an_obama_surge#c773620</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 12:27:18 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by ngtuib uvihb</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>imqwdnhfs hpfkgws xgnjwul vquh uigrhb qinvxykwm cedjlz</p>]]></description>
<author>ngtuib uvihb</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/08/an_obama_surge#c776067</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/08/an_obama_surge#c776067</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 17:19:49 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by extalugwh skno</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>uriscx iuda whlybuxec qojihklc tmlnxfyuc wkegztn cnquvfxh <a href="http://www.wuvg.ascmiotwn.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.wuvg.ascmiotwn.com</a></p>]]></description>
<author>extalugwh skno</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/08/an_obama_surge#c776068</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/08/an_obama_surge#c776068</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 17:20:22 -0800</pubDate>
</item>


</channel>
</rss>
