Science On Science And The English Language
posted by on August 4 at 9:55 PM
Last week, I found myself writing for the Stranger and my General Exam more or less at the same time; these are orthogonal forms of writing. It caused me to reflect upon science and the English language.
(Committee members, stop reading here.)
The first paragraph of my alternative proposal:
I. As it is now.
With an undisputed ability to differentiate into cells from all three germ lineages, embryonic stem cells may provide a replacement cell source for grafting into weakly regenerating tissues. This broad potency can result in the introduction of inappropriate contaminating cell types—including teratoma-generating undifferentiated cells—during grafting.
I hate this paragraph, and will change it a dozen times before turning in the exam.
II. Short, simple declarative sentences.
Embryonic stem cells become everything. That includes heart or brain cells. Sick people need new heart and brain cells. Great! They also become unwanted cells. We only want the right cells. Grafting undifferentiated cells causes tumors! Bummer.
I would write this in crayon.
III. Passive (more so) and (increasingly) awkward.
Tissues have the potential to fail in regeneration. Formation of cells from multiple lineages, all three germ lineages, can occur during differentiation of embryonic stem cells. There are desired and undesired cell types that can be made to exist. It has been observed that teratomas can form. This event occurs particularly when undifferentiated embryonic stem cells were grafted.
This version is depressingly close to what I actually have in the draft.
IV. Mudede(-like)
The embryonic stem cell desires to become everything; being the total of the body is the central purpose of its existence. Our purposes require the embryonic stem cell to go against its most fundamental nature; we must turn the cell that can become anything into a shadow of itself. Such crimes require powerful tools.
I would love to turn in this version. Alas, I would promptly fail.











































American classical music is jazz. Jazz is essentially black music. KPLU is a local radio station that’s dedicated to this music (the highest form of American music) with black roots. What’s wrong with playing Coltrane at bus stops? It’s just not white enough. That must have been the reasoning—no, that was the reasoning. For two reasons: The high possibility that the crime-hardened hiphop thug might recognize those distant jazz rhythms and rediscover the joys and pleasures of the forgotten black art form. European classical music shuts down that possibility. All of it (solos, quartets, symphonies), the black being rejects. And two: American classical music does not inspire a strong of sense of violation; European classic music does. There you have it!







This is all they were trying to say. And it was said in 1951, in Illinois. For thousands of years, others searched the world for the word that would reveal everything, reveal the name of the purpose maker. In one of Borges’ poems, the fictional poet says that very word and the fictional palace of everything vanishes. But unlike the word that names the God in Borges’s majestic universe, the word (the home) that names modernism does not kill it. The word instead locates it in that delicate area once reserved for the temple. This, however, is not the displacement, objectification, and reification of human powers. Here it says what it is: human, all too human. 
The enemy, sir.







This on the north wall of a new building in Pioneer Square called (as far as I can tell) 401 Fifth Ave. What the image captures is the mood of northwest noir. In these woods is a corpse, and the man who brought the corpse here is, of course, a serial killer.
I give in. This wall of tiles might very well turn out to be Seattle’s most surprising (and successful) architectural happening this year. The way it’s outrageous is the right way.
What kind of message is this work of art sending to the prisoners in the jail across the street? What does a man caged in King County Jail think when he sees this horrible series on the corner of the five-story parking building?











Why is there no public outrage over this?

What is happening here? Why is the public so outraged by a football player who likes to watch what dogs like to do at any opportunity—fight each other? Some politicians are even madder at Vick than they were at Donald Rumsfeld, when the secret about Abu Ghraib was exposed. What is the source of this big deal being made? Upset:yes. Unhappy: yes. Outraged: why? For those of us who don’t like violent dogs or violent football, the Vick’s story has about it a cloud of racial, sexual, cultural 



“Private property has made us so 





