<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Slog - Comments on Viaduct Love</title>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/viaduct_love</link>
<description>After the great age of Roman building, the art of the viaduct and aqueduct lay fallow for many centuries, until the Industrial Revolution in Great Britain, when the burgeoning network of canals and railways needed ways to to get around each other. The most wonderful of these structures was the Pontcysyllte Aqueduct, in Wales, built by the genius Thomas Telford in 1795. This carried the water of the Llangollen or Ellesmere Canal in a cast iron channel over the River Dee. Imagine looking up from a boat on the river in the eighteenth century and seeing the mast of a...</description>
<copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 12:21:55 -0800</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 13:30:07 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<generator>http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.34</generator>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

<item>
<title>Comment by Original Andrew</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Ooooohhh, it's on ECB!</p>]]></description>
<author>Original Andrew</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/viaduct_love#c738669</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/viaduct_love#c738669</guid>
<category>Arts</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 12:29:22 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by pox</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>So much for getting that full-time Slogging job.</p>]]></description>
<author>pox</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/viaduct_love#c738671</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/viaduct_love#c738671</guid>
<category>Arts</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 12:29:38 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by hurrrk</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>THIS ONE WAS FUNNIER (I DIDN'T REALLY READ IT)</p>]]></description>
<author>hurrrk</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/viaduct_love#c738672</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/viaduct_love#c738672</guid>
<category>Arts</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 12:30:39 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by grg</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Charles, stop impersonating Fnarf.</p>]]></description>
<author>grg</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/viaduct_love#c738674</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/viaduct_love#c738674</guid>
<category>Arts</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 12:31:47 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Gomez</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Cheeky, though I was expecting a lampoon of ECB.</p>]]></description>
<author>Gomez</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/viaduct_love#c738682</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/viaduct_love#c738682</guid>
<category>Arts</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 12:41:40 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by David Schmader</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Bravo!</p>]]></description>
<author>David Schmader</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/viaduct_love#c738683</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/viaduct_love#c738683</guid>
<category>Arts</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 12:41:46 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by cressona</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>grg: <i>Charles, stop impersonating Fnarf.</i>
<p>Heh. 
<p>Now, to return to developments that are relevant to the 21st century... Here's an item from the front page of today's New York Times:
<br /><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/08/nyregion/08congestion.html?ref=nyregion" rel="nofollow">City Traffic Pricing Wins U.S. and Spitzer’s Favor</a></p></p></p>]]></description>
<author>cressona</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/viaduct_love#c738684</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/viaduct_love#c738684</guid>
<category>Arts</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 12:42:14 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Dan Savage</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Not in the least big convincing, Fnarf.</p>]]></description>
<author>Dan Savage</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/viaduct_love#c738687</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/viaduct_love#c738687</guid>
<category>Arts</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 12:44:16 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by ho&apos; know</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>I'm totally loving this - taking the shit out of Charles  </p>

<p>Pox is right though, been nice knowing ya'  </p>

<p>tee hee.</p>]]></description>
<author>ho&apos; know</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/viaduct_love#c738689</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/viaduct_love#c738689</guid>
<category>Arts</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 12:46:51 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by EXTC</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>All this post proves is that it's possible to take a pretty picture of an ugly structure.</p>]]></description>
<author>EXTC</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/viaduct_love#c738691</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/viaduct_love#c738691</guid>
<category>Arts</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 12:47:49 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Will in Seattle</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Dang, you made me miss Vancouver!</p>]]></description>
<author>Will in Seattle</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/viaduct_love#c738697</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/viaduct_love#c738697</guid>
<category>Arts</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 12:51:51 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by ivan</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Gig 'em, Fnarf. Good on ya!</p>]]></description>
<author>ivan</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/viaduct_love#c738699</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/viaduct_love#c738699</guid>
<category>Arts</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 12:53:01 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Madashell</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>All the money and energy around this issue, and all the waxing poetic about aesthetics. The fact is, you can take value of aesthetics only to a certain point. Utility sometimes trumps beauty. Otherwise we'd be working towards lining Harbor Island with boulevards and trees as well.</p>

<p>I'd be willing to bet that after the millions are spent by the city council to study the surface-transit option, they will come back to the obvious: the viaduct needs to be replaced. AND we need more mass transit. </p>]]></description>
<author>Madashell</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/viaduct_love#c738707</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/viaduct_love#c738707</guid>
<category>Arts</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 12:59:01 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by ECB</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>The distinguishing factor in most of your examples of viaducts is that they are in fact bridges over bodies of water, making them necessary if people are to traverse the body of water. The Alaskan Way Viaduct, as it could be replaced by a conventional surface-level roadway and still serve the same function, is unnecessary. In addition, most of your examples are in fact stone or steel, not concrete.</p>]]></description>
<author>ECB</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/viaduct_love#c738709</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/viaduct_love#c738709</guid>
<category>Arts</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 13:01:43 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Lloyd Clydesdale</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Say it with pride, Fnarf!  If you want to walk, walk down the street.  Leave the Viaduct up.  Cars aren't the problem, it's the emissions.  America awaits it's next engineering genius with sweaty brow and trembling wallet.</p>

<p>Fnarf, are you taking your shot at a hundo in the comments?</p>]]></description>
<author>Lloyd Clydesdale</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/viaduct_love#c738717</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/viaduct_love#c738717</guid>
<category>Arts</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 13:10:06 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by gfish</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>The contrast just shows all the more clearly how truly ugly our viaduct is.</p>

<p>But fuck aesthetics. The viaduct could be the most beautiful piece of civil engineering from the last 50 years and I'd still want to get rid of it. Building more capacity increases demand. Reducing capacity reduces demand. It's really, really simple.</p>]]></description>
<author>gfish</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/viaduct_love#c738720</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/viaduct_love#c738720</guid>
<category>Arts</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 13:13:38 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by NapoleonXIV</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>The truly wonderful thing about the Viaduct is that its form is not despoiled by landscaping.  </p>]]></description>
<author>NapoleonXIV</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/viaduct_love#c738726</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/viaduct_love#c738726</guid>
<category>Arts</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 13:18:41 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Travis</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>I'm bored.</p>]]></description>
<author>Travis</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/viaduct_love#c738735</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/viaduct_love#c738735</guid>
<category>Arts</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 13:22:35 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Big Sven</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>"Building more capacity increases demand. Reducing capacity reduces demand."</p>

<p>I'm with you on the first part.  Explain to me again how the second part works?  Are we going to tear down all the single family homes in Queen Anne and Magnolia and build high rises to provide room for all folks from Bellevue, Kent, and Edmonds that are going to be flocking into town?  Just curious.</p>]]></description>
<author>Big Sven</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/viaduct_love#c738736</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/viaduct_love#c738736</guid>
<category>Arts</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 13:22:49 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Travis</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>I'm bored.</p>]]></description>
<author>Travis</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/viaduct_love#c738737</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/viaduct_love#c738737</guid>
<category>Arts</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 13:22:51 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by hunh?</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>I love it! Viva le viaduct!</p>]]></description>
<author>hunh?</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/viaduct_love#c738748</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/viaduct_love#c738748</guid>
<category>Arts</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 13:27:05 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Fnarf</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>I'll never make a hundred, Lloyd, unless I attack the fucking cripples.</p>]]></description>
<author>Fnarf</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/viaduct_love#c738751</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/viaduct_love#c738751</guid>
<category>Arts</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 13:28:53 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by gfish</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>19: Sure, or we'll improve transit and increase density in other parts of the area. Or some of both.</p>

<p>Suburbs as we know them were unthinkable before the massive social engineering project that is the American highway system. We spent 50 years encouraging their growth, and now we need to start encouraging their abandonment. Nothing happens overnight, but our cities are capable of amazing change when presented with the right incentives. The very existence of this problem in the first place shows that.</p>]]></description>
<author>gfish</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/viaduct_love#c738754</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/viaduct_love#c738754</guid>
<category>Arts</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 13:30:20 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by where&apos;s waldo?</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>The RTID just approved a Pierce Co. plan that INCLUDES the cross-base highway:</p>

<p><a href="http://www.thenewstribune.com/front/topstories/story/81780.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.thenewstribune.com/front/topstories/story/81780.html</a></p>

<p>Double-fuck 'em.</p>]]></description>
<author>where&apos;s waldo?</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/viaduct_love#c738765</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/viaduct_love#c738765</guid>
<category>Arts</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 13:36:46 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Orphan Road</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>"It also provides anyone with a car the spectacular Puget Sound views that would otherwise belong only to those in expensive downtown condominiums."</p>

<p>Just remember kids: a new viaduct will have taller, solid-concrete walls on either side to comply with new safety regs.  You won't have a view from your car.  </p>]]></description>
<author>Orphan Road</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/viaduct_love#c738779</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/viaduct_love#c738779</guid>
<category>Arts</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 13:46:42 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Mr. X</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>@23,</p>

<p>Edmonds is now a suburb, and is almost as old as Seattle.  Ditto lots of other older smaller cities throughout the region.</p>

<p>@25</p>

<p>Spare us the discredited Tim Ceis talking points.</p>

<p>Well put, FNARF, well put. ECB's got nuthin!</p>]]></description>
<author>Mr. X</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/viaduct_love#c738823</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/viaduct_love#c738823</guid>
<category>Arts</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 14:21:10 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Sean</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Fnarf, by juxtaposing images of those other beautiful bridges with our own charmless pile of concrete, you've made a pretty strong case for tearing that shit down. </p>]]></description>
<author>Sean</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/viaduct_love#c738827</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/viaduct_love#c738827</guid>
<category>Arts</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 14:23:12 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Lloyd Clydesdale</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Sean, I find the effectiveness of it quite charming indeed.</p>]]></description>
<author>Lloyd Clydesdale</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/viaduct_love#c738871</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/viaduct_love#c738871</guid>
<category>Arts</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 14:47:37 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Jensen Interceptor</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>ECB Wrote: <br />
"The Alaskan Way Viaduct, as it could be replaced by a conventional surface-level roadway and still serve the same function, is unnecessary."</p>

<p>That is the fundamental problem with <br />
the surface transit proposal. Moving the function of the Viaduct to the surface on Alaska Way is a profoundly <br />
shallow and poor use of the limited land mass in the corridor. This is a   land use issue and not road building one. Building a surface highway is <br />
not a cure. Bridge It! </p>

<p> --- Jensen   </p>

<p> <br />
 </p>]]></description>
<author>Jensen Interceptor</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/viaduct_love#c738903</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/viaduct_love#c738903</guid>
<category>Arts</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 15:05:23 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by maxsolomon</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>catastrophic earthquake, save us from ourselves.</p>]]></description>
<author>maxsolomon</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/viaduct_love#c738935</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/viaduct_love#c738935</guid>
<category>Arts</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 15:22:40 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by elrider</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>"In fact" ECB, I count only 4 of the 6 viaducts displayed by Fnarf as going over natural bodies of water. One of the remaining was used to convey water, not people, over a stream.</p>

<p>Your usual loose application of facts.</p>

<p>Go Fnarf!</p>]]></description>
<author>elrider</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/viaduct_love#c739065</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/viaduct_love#c739065</guid>
<category>Arts</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 16:40:33 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Jay</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Well, it it conveys water it's an aqueduct.  I'm not exactly sure Fnarf knows the differences, mostly radical, between the displayed structures either.  The function and aesthetic analogy doesn't hold up much, given the viaduct is neither beautifully ornamental nor a real engineering achievement.  The Bonneville dam is an engineering achievement, the viaduct is an ugly elevated road.</p>

<p>If Fnarf seriously believes the Seattle viaduct is beautiful, he probably thinks parking lots and 7-11s are beautiful too.</p>]]></description>
<author>Jay</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/viaduct_love#c739154</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/viaduct_love#c739154</guid>
<category>Arts</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 18:07:03 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Jay</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Parking lots are just as functional.  And some of them are even elevated!<br />
</p>]]></description>
<author>Jay</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/viaduct_love#c739155</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/viaduct_love#c739155</guid>
<category>Arts</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 18:08:32 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Jay</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>note: the aqueduct comment was not directed at Fnarf but at Erica.  There should have been a break there.</p>]]></description>
<author>Jay</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/viaduct_love#c739159</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/viaduct_love#c739159</guid>
<category>Arts</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 18:25:20 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Bill</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>MSN I NIIPET<br />
<a href="http://msn.com" rel="nofollow">MSN</a></p>]]></description>
<author>Bill</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/viaduct_love#c741514</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/viaduct_love#c741514</guid>
<category>Arts</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 15:11:13 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Bill</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>MSN I NIIPET<br />
<a href="http://msn.com" rel="nofollow">MSN</a></p>]]></description>
<author>Bill</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/viaduct_love#c741516</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/viaduct_love#c741516</guid>
<category>Arts</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 15:11:34 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by awerjpim braqgvjml</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>wdcqnlgxv lrbup ckonge zvsr uegkaz ydpvrltc gnrlhju</p>]]></description>
<author>awerjpim braqgvjml</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/viaduct_love#c743657</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/viaduct_love#c743657</guid>
<category>Arts</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 21:43:46 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by pmvyn vwjhdst</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>ufzb fsmpnvzkg ybosmdnr hnrgk asfht hujzf siprynxtc <a href="http://www.yvatg.aekhuvbln.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.yvatg.aekhuvbln.com</a></p>]]></description>
<author>pmvyn vwjhdst</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/viaduct_love#c743658</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/viaduct_love#c743658</guid>
<category>Arts</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 21:45:01 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by AAS</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>y3WqnW Hey, there is what you need.</p>]]></description>
<author>AAS</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/viaduct_love#c744840</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/viaduct_love#c744840</guid>
<category>Arts</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jun 2007 17:59:39 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by AAS</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>y3WqnW Hey, there is what you need.</p>]]></description>
<author>AAS</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/viaduct_love#c744842</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/viaduct_love#c744842</guid>
<category>Arts</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jun 2007 17:59:46 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by AAS</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>y3WqnW Hey, there is what you need.</p>]]></description>
<author>AAS</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/viaduct_love#c744843</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/viaduct_love#c744843</guid>
<category>Arts</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jun 2007 17:59:51 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Jim Carner</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>very <a href="http://www.euro-carparts.info" rel="nofollow">cool</a> site</p>]]></description>
<author>Jim Carner</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/viaduct_love#c745800</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/viaduct_love#c745800</guid>
<category>Arts</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 13:30:07 -0800</pubDate>
</item>


</channel>
</rss>