<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Slog - Comments on The YouTube Debate</title>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/the_youtube_debate</link>
<description>Coming July 23... The presidential debates are about to enter the world of YouTube, the anything-goes home-video-sharing Web site that puts the power in the hands of the camera holder. YouTube, which is owned by Google, and CNN are co-sponsoring a debate among the eight Democratic presidential candidates on July 23 in South Carolina, an event that could define the next phase of what has already been called the YouTube election......</description>
<copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 16:15:12 -0800</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 16:42:16 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<generator>http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.34</generator>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

<item>
<title>Comment by Dougsf</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>I don't really understand how this differs from a televised debate with a couple of audience members participating via webcam. YouTube isn't utilized for any sort of closed circuit real time communication, so other than having them as a sponsor, what am I missing that makes this a "YouTube debate"?</p>]]></description>
<author>Dougsf</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/the_youtube_debate#c742654</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/the_youtube_debate#c742654</guid>
<category>Politics</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 16:42:16 -0800</pubDate>
</item>


</channel>
</rss>