Slog: News & Arts

RSS icon Comments on The Auburn Supersonics

1
Posted by It's in the Times | June 5, 2007 1:47 PM
2

If the tribe wants to pay for it I'm all for them building the stadium. They can even rename them the Muckleshoot Sonics and Storm.

Posted by elswinger | June 5, 2007 1:47 PM
3

That'd actually be pretty sweet. If they play on sovereign land, they play by SONICS rules. Maybe that last shot was worth 20 points? You have no authority here!

Posted by Dougsf | June 5, 2007 1:50 PM
4

will there be gambling within the basketball stadium? i might actually go then!

Posted by Bellevue Ave | June 5, 2007 1:50 PM
5

I suggested years ago that the City should sell the Key to the Muckelshoots, give them the land and make it reservation land. Then we can have the Sonics and Gambling on Queen Anne while not having to pay anything for it. A beautiful idea.

Posted by Meinert | June 5, 2007 1:54 PM
6

I'm not paying for another stadium...

Posted by Angry Andrew | June 5, 2007 2:01 PM
7

If you think you're getting out of paying for it, you're on some quality pharmaceuticals.

Posted by supergp | June 5, 2007 2:01 PM
8

It'll be the only place you can bet on a game then watch live all in the same venue.

Really though, they could move the team to Cle Elum and I wouldn't care.

Posted by monkey | June 5, 2007 2:03 PM
9

hard booze to boot? gambling? whores? cheap food to lure the crowds? moderate hotels?

wow

Posted by Essex | June 5, 2007 2:17 PM
10

I thought the whole reason that Las Vegas wasn't an option was because the NBA had issues with the city's gambling. I wonder if the same issues will surface with this idea.

Posted by Ram | June 5, 2007 2:17 PM
11

But Las Vegas was just the site for the NBA All Star Weekend/Game and it was hugely successful. I think the NBA is reconsidering allowing a team in Vegas. As long as the players, coaches, and owners don't bet on sports, there shouldn't be a problem.

Posted by elswinger | June 5, 2007 2:39 PM
12

That pouch-eyed devil Phil Jackson could smoke a ceegar courtside. Mm.

Posted by tomasyalba | June 5, 2007 2:40 PM
13

Don't move the Sonics... they bring in more money than we as taxpayers spend on them... and it adds culture to our city. In our quest to become a world class city, sacrifices must be made.... tear down the viaduct and put the damn thing underground, keep the sports teams, and build a mass transit system that goes to the major metro areas, including Bellevue that doesn't use the BUS.

Posted by Jason | June 5, 2007 2:54 PM
14

where do you get your numbers, jason? i would be curious to see what the sonics bring in vs. what has been spent (and will be spent) on key arena--also, what would be spent to keep them here.

Posted by curious | June 5, 2007 2:59 PM
15
If you think you're getting out of paying for it, you're on some quality pharmaceuticals.

I will Tim Eyman any payment proposal into oblivion before they break ground.

There are just too many actually important civic projects that need to be built and anybody who thinks we need sports teams to create "culture" should visit the cultureless sports havens of Orlando Phoenix and Denver.

Posted by Angry Andrew | June 5, 2007 3:08 PM
16

...and you thought the stink about the White River Amphitheater was bad.

Posted by Collin | June 5, 2007 3:17 PM
17

I totally agree with @2 - so long as the tribe and the Sonics owner(s) pay for it, they can build it anywhere.

But step away from my Seattle tax dollars.

Posted by Will in Seattle | June 5, 2007 3:18 PM
18

If this were to happen, I think Muckleshoot would replace Tulalip as the number one place for fun.

Posted by storm fan | June 5, 2007 3:22 PM
19

Even though I hate the idea of 20,000 (or whatever) cars trekking across the suburbs every home game, I would LOVE it if they renamed the team the Muckleshoot Storm/Sonics. Maybe even the Muckleshoot Slots/Craps?

Posted by jamier | June 5, 2007 3:23 PM
20

As long as the Storm gets to be called the Slots, I wouldn't have a problem with that.

Posted by elswinger | June 5, 2007 3:35 PM
21

If they moved, could we rename the team Muckleshoot Indians? I mean, would that be ok?

Posted by Collin | June 5, 2007 3:53 PM
22

The Muckleshooters!

Posted by Randy | June 5, 2007 4:47 PM
23

17,000 people in private vehicles heading for a 7 pm tipoff just off the West Valley Highway? over WSDOT's & King County's dead body.

Bennett is taking the team to OK city, where they'll quickly become a poorly attended joke looking for another city. stop fooling yourselves that anything else is going to happen.

they're GONE.

Posted by maxsolomon | June 5, 2007 4:57 PM
24

"they're GONE. "

Let's get a hockey team or something then.

Posted by Transit Man | June 5, 2007 5:21 PM
25

Cool, NHL here we come!

Now, let's come up with a name ... Seattle Sk8rs? any ideas?

Posted by Will in Seattle | June 5, 2007 5:38 PM
26

I think the NHL has already said Key Arena is too small. The taxpayers would still be expected to pay for a new stadium.

I would like to see Seattle start a new trend of cities telling billionaire team owners to fuck off. I won't hold my breath though.

Posted by elswinger | June 6, 2007 8:55 AM
27

"There are just too many actually important civic projects that need to be built and anybody who thinks we need sports teams to create "culture" should visit the cultureless sports havens of Orlando Phoenix and Denver."

Obviously spoken by an arrogant clueless Seattleite who's never been to any of those places.

Posted by here we go again | June 7, 2007 10:57 AM
28

I think the NHL has already said Key Arena is too small. The taxpayers would still be expected to pay for a new stadium.

I would like to see Seattle start a new trend of cities telling billionaire team owners to fuck off. I won't hold my breath though.

Yes!!! Let's do that because the only people who lose are the fans/citizens of the city. It is ALWAYS fun to cut your nose of to spite your face!

Posted by Myk | June 7, 2007 12:33 PM
29

I know my company books huge venues in cities like Las Vegas, Houston, Atlanta and Chicago every year. We have a very strong relationship with a local company who makes software over in Redmond who has founders with strong local sports ties. We have never been able to hold anything larger than a software conference here in Seattle since the Convention center was too small. A new facility large enough would certainly attract us here given our West Coast HQ and our relationship with local partners in Seattle. Gregoire’s comments about the increased in value to the region to have one are on target. This year we are running three simultaneous conferences in Vegas in July and are booking most of the hotels and advertising revenue in Vegas for a full week as a result. Add to that periperal rental car revenue, (and taxes), restaurants, tourist ventures etc. and you have a lot of money being spent on the area that gets the gigs. We even have a private concert every year that fills up a Key Arena size faciltiy for some second tier artist.

Posted by TIM | June 7, 2007 1:33 PM
30

MSN I NIIPET
MSN

Posted by Bill | June 12, 2007 1:23 PM
31

MSN I NIIPET
MSN

Posted by Bill | June 12, 2007 1:24 PM
32

MSN I NIIPET
MSN

Posted by Bill | June 12, 2007 1:24 PM

Comments Closed

In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 45 days old).