<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Slog - Comments on One correction</title>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/one_correction</link>
<description>In my column this week, I claimed: It is not clear that adult human cells can be reprogrammed; there is only one hint in all the scientific literature. Uh, better make that two hints: Previous efforts to obtain embryonic stem cells from cloned primate embryos have failed. Korean cloning scientist Woo Sook Hwang lost his job over fabricated successes using human eggs. But Shoukhrat Mitalipov of the Oregon National Primate Research Centre in the United States said he had succeeded using modified Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer, or SCNT, in which an egg cell nucleus is removed and replaced with a...</description>
<copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 14:51:20 -0800</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 18:16:28 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<generator>http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.34</generator>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

<item>
<title>Comment by Will in Seattle</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>You would be wrong.</p>

<p>siRNA, miRNA, and various other RNA snippets are constantly modifying your cells all the time.</p>

<p>try to keep up ...</p>]]></description>
<author>Will in Seattle</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/one_correction#c748877</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/one_correction#c748877</guid>
<category>Conflict of Interest</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 15:22:07 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Will in Seattle</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and the YIELDS of these modified stem cells (made from skin cells) is something like 4 to 5 from 1,000,000 cells.</p>

<p>Low yields like that won't do for actual scientific research.</p>

<p>Tell Bush to sod off.</p>]]></description>
<author>Will in Seattle</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/one_correction#c748879</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/one_correction#c748879</guid>
<category>Conflict of Interest</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 15:24:20 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by arjache</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately Mitalipov's approach sounds like it would be even more controversial than traditional embryonic stem cell research. Yes, with the new technique you're starting from an adult cell - but then you end up effectively cloning the adult, growing the clone to the embryo stage, and *then* harvesting the stem cells. I have a hard time imagining a process involving both cloning *and* embryos gaining any political popularity today.</p>]]></description>
<author>arjache</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/one_correction#c748980</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/one_correction#c748980</guid>
<category>Conflict of Interest</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 17:12:37 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Jonathan Golob</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>arjache --</p>

<p>I think you're totally correct about the political implications.</p>

<p>I find this scientifically interesting because it's only the second demonstration that adult primate cells can be turned into pluripotent (embryonic stem cell-like) cells, by any means.   Without evidence like this and the cloning paper I cited in the column, I'd doubt that any bit of genetic trickery could wipe clean the genome of an adult human cell.</p>]]></description>
<author>Jonathan Golob</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/one_correction#c748998</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/one_correction#c748998</guid>
<category>Conflict of Interest</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 17:34:10 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Will in Seattle</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>@3 - and what if they "accidentally" brushed some skin off you and used it to grow things?</p>

<p>At least with stem cells donated, you have clear consent forms.</p>

<p>Meanwhile our scientists keep moving out of the USA ...</p>]]></description>
<author>Will in Seattle</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/one_correction#c749014</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/one_correction#c749014</guid>
<category>Conflict of Interest</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 17:58:52 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by kvsanmh hmlwo</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>yznj yocz rldy ihbkxnzsd rbtmuvgkf rhzsqtxj gndk</p>]]></description>
<author>kvsanmh hmlwo</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/one_correction#c751714</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/one_correction#c751714</guid>
<category>Conflict of Interest</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 18:11:52 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by kvsanmh hmlwo</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>yznj yocz rldy ihbkxnzsd rbtmuvgkf rhzsqtxj gndk</p>]]></description>
<author>kvsanmh hmlwo</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/one_correction#c751763</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/one_correction#c751763</guid>
<category>Conflict of Interest</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 18:16:28 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by kvsanmh hmlwo</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>yznj yocz rldy ihbkxnzsd rbtmuvgkf rhzsqtxj gndk</p>]]></description>
<author>kvsanmh hmlwo</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/one_correction#c751761</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/one_correction#c751761</guid>
<category>Conflict of Interest</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 18:16:28 -0800</pubDate>
</item>


</channel>
</rss>
