Slog: News & Arts

RSS icon Comments on The Morning News

1

The morning news... At 2:04 PM...

Posted by Justin | June 24, 2007 2:43 PM
2

Well, I think we can cut an unpaid intern some slack on the Sunday of a Pride weekend.

Posted by raindrop | June 24, 2007 4:30 PM
3

You know what a great pride present be? The presidential candidates standing up without appologies for gays and lesbians. Until they do I just can not see giving any of them much support or money.

Posted by Pissed off Fag | June 24, 2007 4:47 PM
4

Appears to be the Bellevue School District that's gone homo-curriculum, not Seattle. Or at least not yet.

Posted by glasses wearer | June 24, 2007 7:57 PM
5

The Dan Savage/George Bush war on the people in Iraq continues. More suffering, more destruction, more maimed bodies, more dead children, women and men, soldier and civilian. Ahhhhhhhhh, Dan Savage will tell you, but what a glorious war it is. Freedom is on the march. We're fighting them over there so we don't have to fight 'em over here. Dan has blood on his hands as much as the most die-hard evangelical supporter of George W. bush does.

Posted by Life is good | June 24, 2007 8:24 PM
6

@5: Your rant is amateurish, contorted, stupid, and above all BORING!

Posted by raindrop | June 25, 2007 12:39 AM
7

@6, I second your motion!!!!

Posted by Just Me | June 25, 2007 7:39 AM
8

6 & 7 GO FUCK YOURSELF!People are being maimed and killed and Dan Savage, America's favorite cocksucker, helped Bush make it happen and you find it boring!

Posted by Life is good | June 25, 2007 8:50 AM
9

This isn't about Iraq, LIG, because a lot of good people and Democrats supported removing Saddam. That includes Hillary, John Kerry, Al Gore, Maria Cantwell and others. Positions change as facts come to light.

No, this is about that you are jealous of Dan Savage and thought you found an angle to elevate yourself and have folks marvel over your revelations which is really nothing more that warped hyperbole.

You know, Abraham Lincoln was at first not for freeing the slaves, he initially just wanted to stop the expansions of slavery. Why arenít you ranting against him? It makes just as much sense, from your flawed perspective.

Posted by raindrop | June 25, 2007 9:54 AM

Comments Closed

In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 45 days old).