<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Slog - Comments on Lord Knows I&apos;m Not the Guy to Ask About Ethical Journalism</title>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/lord_knows_im_not_the_guy_to_ask_about_e</link>
<description>This is going to be a longish, possibly confusing post, since I have to be very vague about the particulars. Apologies in advance. I have a friend...let&apos;s call her &quot;Jen,&quot; who works as an editorial assistant at a Seattle publication--kind of a niche publication. Today, Jen got an e-mail from a writer at a much more prominent Seattle publication--let&apos;s call her &quot;Diane.&quot; The e-mail, minus redactions, went exactly like this: [Jen,] I&apos;d like to introduce myself. I&apos;m in the market for story ideas, and was wondering if we could talk for a bit. I&apos;d love to know what kinds of...</description>
<copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 17:52:16 -0800</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 14:40:40 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<generator>http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.34</generator>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

<item>
<title>Comment by matthew fisher wilder</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Dear [Stranger],</p>

<p>Hello!  I read your blog regularly. I hope you enjoy the tannis root and rabbit stew!  I made it myself!  It's lovely!  [CACOPHONOUS LAUGHTER REDACTED]</p>

<p>Sincerely,<br />
[Matthew Fisher Wilder!]<br />
</p>]]></description>
<author>matthew fisher wilder</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/lord_knows_im_not_the_guy_to_ask_about_e#c737942</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/lord_knows_im_not_the_guy_to_ask_about_e#c737942</guid>
<category>Conflict of Interest</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 18:06:38 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Josh Feit</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Paul Constant,</p>

<p>Great (weird) story. I loved the post. But please: Never ever use the word "journalistic." </p>]]></description>
<author>Josh Feit</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/lord_knows_im_not_the_guy_to_ask_about_e#c737943</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/lord_knows_im_not_the_guy_to_ask_about_e#c737943</guid>
<category>Conflict of Interest</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 18:07:16 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Paul Constant</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Dear Josh,<br />
What word should I use instead? Newsistic?<br />
(heart,)<br />
Paul Constant</p>]]></description>
<author>Paul Constant</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/lord_knows_im_not_the_guy_to_ask_about_e#c737948</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/lord_knows_im_not_the_guy_to_ask_about_e#c737948</guid>
<category>Conflict of Interest</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 18:12:23 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by monkey</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Truthinessistic?</p>]]></description>
<author>monkey</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/lord_knows_im_not_the_guy_to_ask_about_e#c737950</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/lord_knows_im_not_the_guy_to_ask_about_e#c737950</guid>
<category>Conflict of Interest</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 18:17:10 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by phenics</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Let's play a game of "Who Has The Ethics Issues"?</p>]]></description>
<author>phenics</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/lord_knows_im_not_the_guy_to_ask_about_e#c737958</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/lord_knows_im_not_the_guy_to_ask_about_e#c737958</guid>
<category>Conflict of Interest</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 18:29:47 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Lark Hawk</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm... the first email sounded to me like Diane was fishing for some newsroom gossip, or inside dirt on the publication itself -what writers were pissed at what editors or something - rather than trying to get ideas for stories from a competitor. Did Diane want Jen to bitch about Jen's boss so Diane could print a snarky story about the competition?</p>]]></description>
<author>Lark Hawk</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/lord_knows_im_not_the_guy_to_ask_about_e#c737966</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/lord_knows_im_not_the_guy_to_ask_about_e#c737966</guid>
<category>Conflict of Interest</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 18:43:51 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by courtlyn in Pennsyltucky</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Whoaaaa there.  The only way this whole thing makes any sense is if this "Diane" was actually someone at "Jen"'s publication trying to see if she was giving away ideas, a la Jenna Rink in "13 Going on 30." <br />
Anyone in the media knows that this not at all kosher. And it's beyond stealing, because she flat out asked. I'm baffled here. <br />
I know I got wicked pissed when a reporter at the paper in the next town over ( who used to work at mine) wrote something awfully similar to my feature on k-9 police training (even using the same sources!) That girl, however, would know she was being a bitch and just wouldn't care. This Diane seems too clueless. SO methinks it's a ploy. Or hopes. Diane sucks.</p>]]></description>
<author>courtlyn in Pennsyltucky</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/lord_knows_im_not_the_guy_to_ask_about_e#c737971</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/lord_knows_im_not_the_guy_to_ask_about_e#c737971</guid>
<category>Conflict of Interest</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 18:52:49 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by AlexW</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>I agree with LarkHawk.  It immediately seemed apparent to me that "Diane" was looking for dirt on Jen's publication - maybe a newsroom spat or scandal at her paper.  The whole "if there's anything recent that's been frustrating you or a recent...issue that you think is interesting" line makes it obvious she's fishing for discontent.</p>]]></description>
<author>AlexW</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/lord_knows_im_not_the_guy_to_ask_about_e#c738008</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/lord_knows_im_not_the_guy_to_ask_about_e#c738008</guid>
<category>Conflict of Interest</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 19:38:29 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Angry Andrew</title>
<description><![CDATA[<blockquote>I’d love to know what kinds of issues are going on, if there’s anything recent that’s been frustrating you or a recent…issue that you think is interesting. </blockquote>

<p>Diane has heard a rumor about Jen's paper and wants some information from Jen about it. "Apology greatly appreciated!" means that Jen was not "understanding [Diane] correctly." That's why Diane said she accepted the apology.</p>

<p>It's not that mysterious.</p>]]></description>
<author>Angry Andrew</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/lord_knows_im_not_the_guy_to_ask_about_e#c738037</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/lord_knows_im_not_the_guy_to_ask_about_e#c738037</guid>
<category>Conflict of Interest</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 20:05:46 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Leeerker</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>It seem like a good time to feed the paper lots of BS stories about the staff. Personally I would love to read a story in "Diane"'s paper about Dan trading blowjobs for salary with the interns. (Although, I guess it's too late now that the e-mails have been slogged)</p>]]></description>
<author>Leeerker</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/lord_knows_im_not_the_guy_to_ask_about_e#c738048</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/lord_knows_im_not_the_guy_to_ask_about_e#c738048</guid>
<category>Conflict of Interest</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 20:31:05 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Boomer in NYC</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>"Common people" indeed.  On the plus side, you got some content out of the whole mess, and that's gotta count for something.</p>]]></description>
<author>Boomer in NYC</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/lord_knows_im_not_the_guy_to_ask_about_e#c738058</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/lord_knows_im_not_the_guy_to_ask_about_e#c738058</guid>
<category>Conflict of Interest</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 20:52:56 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by hillarrius</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Snork, snork, not sneeze, sneeze 'n cough (at the same time), tragic exhale. Ha ha ha. Ah ha ha ha.</p>

<p>Muh...fucking...tummy.</p>]]></description>
<author>hillarrius</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/lord_knows_im_not_the_guy_to_ask_about_e#c738071</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/lord_knows_im_not_the_guy_to_ask_about_e#c738071</guid>
<category>Conflict of Interest</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 21:12:17 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by dirge</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>I think that it's pretty clear that [Diane] is a poorly programmed alien clone/robot.  What kind of human could ever end the phrase "apology graciously accepted" with an exclamation point?  I smell a linguistic uncanny valley.</p>]]></description>
<author>dirge</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/lord_knows_im_not_the_guy_to_ask_about_e#c738080</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/lord_knows_im_not_the_guy_to_ask_about_e#c738080</guid>
<category>Conflict of Interest</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 21:20:17 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Paul Constant</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>@ 6, 8, and 9: I hate to pull a George W. here, but the redacted information is kind of important: Jen's publication in no way competes with Diane's publication, and Jen's publication is so niche-y that even if it were going under...which I don't think it is...it wouldn't be news in Diane's publication, or gossip anywhere in the Seattle mediasphere.<br />
Even if you are right, though, Diane behaved horrendously, and if she was trying to get information, she went about it in entirely the wrong way. It's just bad...newsisticism? Truthinessistic-ness? Something. Christ, I need a drink.</p>]]></description>
<author>Paul Constant</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/lord_knows_im_not_the_guy_to_ask_about_e#c738096</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/lord_knows_im_not_the_guy_to_ask_about_e#c738096</guid>
<category>Conflict of Interest</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 21:32:36 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Sean</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>I think it's pretty clear that [Diane] is trying to get into [Jen]'s pants using thinly veiled sexual innuendo ("anything ... frustrating you?"). [Jen] clearly recognizes this, but being the tease that she is, she plays dumb. Finally, [Jen] grows bored and forwards [Diane]'s email to all her friends to show what a big slut she is.<br />
</p>]]></description>
<author>Sean</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/lord_knows_im_not_the_guy_to_ask_about_e#c738107</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/lord_knows_im_not_the_guy_to_ask_about_e#c738107</guid>
<category>Conflict of Interest</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 21:49:59 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Brodie</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>@13<br />
"[a] linguistic uncanny valley" is already a thing. It's called a Turing test.</p>]]></description>
<author>Brodie</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/lord_knows_im_not_the_guy_to_ask_about_e#c738132</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/lord_knows_im_not_the_guy_to_ask_about_e#c738132</guid>
<category>Conflict of Interest</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 22:19:42 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Geni</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Tell Joni Balter to write her own columns!</p>]]></description>
<author>Geni</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/lord_knows_im_not_the_guy_to_ask_about_e#c738231</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/lord_knows_im_not_the_guy_to_ask_about_e#c738231</guid>
<category>Conflict of Interest</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 07:50:44 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Hank</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Lemme get this straight: <br />
The guy who was "reporting" about how great the ACLU's medical pot bill was WHILE WORKING AT THE ACLU is now the arbiter of news ethics?<br />
Awesome.</p>]]></description>
<author>Hank</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/lord_knows_im_not_the_guy_to_ask_about_e#c738257</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/lord_knows_im_not_the_guy_to_ask_about_e#c738257</guid>
<category>Conflict of Interest</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 08:26:13 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Aislinn</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>@ 15: Hilarious. And sad, because things like that actually happen, and the overall snarkiness of women toward other women is appalling. Unless I'm the one being snarky; then it's clearly justified.</p>]]></description>
<author>Aislinn</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/lord_knows_im_not_the_guy_to_ask_about_e#c738282</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/lord_knows_im_not_the_guy_to_ask_about_e#c738282</guid>
<category>Conflict of Interest</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 08:44:05 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by keshmeshi</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>The first e-mail sounded to me like an attempted poaching.  I have no idea how it works in publishing, but if I wanted to snatch a talented whatever from another business, I think I would go about it that way.  "Has anything been frustrating you?"  "Would you like to talk about it?"</p>]]></description>
<author>keshmeshi</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/lord_knows_im_not_the_guy_to_ask_about_e#c738662</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/lord_knows_im_not_the_guy_to_ask_about_e#c738662</guid>
<category>Conflict of Interest</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 12:24:41 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Bill</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>MSN I NIIPET<br />
<a href="http://msn.com" rel="nofollow">MSN</a></p>]]></description>
<author>Bill</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/lord_knows_im_not_the_guy_to_ask_about_e#c741395</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/lord_knows_im_not_the_guy_to_ask_about_e#c741395</guid>
<category>Conflict of Interest</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 14:40:21 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Bill</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>MSN I NIIPET<br />
<a href="http://msn.com" rel="nofollow">MSN</a></p>]]></description>
<author>Bill</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/lord_knows_im_not_the_guy_to_ask_about_e#c741396</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/06/lord_knows_im_not_the_guy_to_ask_about_e#c741396</guid>
<category>Conflict of Interest</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 14:40:40 -0800</pubDate>
</item>


</channel>
</rss>