Very unfair for Josh and the Dems to imply the GOP "may violate" the rules ..."Presumption of guilt" it's called.
Anyway the more interesting issue is why should the donations not be returned to donors?
They gave to Maleng. Not to the Republicans. They should have the choice to get their money back.
Dems, do you have the guts to find a plaintiff and bring the class action? There's some money at stake. And if you lose you might tie up the funds long enough so they don't go to the Republican guy. And you win politically standing up for donor choice and against unintended corrupt windfalls.
Oh forgot, only the Republicans actually fight and sue, the Dems prefer "duel by speculation."
It appears that most (if not all) of Maleng's surplus will be given to charity. See http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/local/320402_prosecutor20.html
tqfad fsnelkdq jkvzp qpbxu oxgjpaqh ayprshl zdpe
In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 45 days old).