Slog: News & Arts

RSS icon Comments on Bust a Nut

1

Impossible. She's a woman. Women are not violent at all! Ask Erica!

Posted by Mr. Poe | June 13, 2007 11:22 AM
2

See, here's an example of bald-faced sexism. This is clearly a hell of a lot more than a "wounding". It's sexual assault: he refused her sexual advances so she attacked him and mutilated his genitals. If a man did something like this to a woman it'd be clear sexual assault or forcible rape and I'd expect a much harsher sentence.

And of course we won't hear anything from ECB about this: she only cares about institutionalized sexism if it's working against women.

Posted by Judah | June 13, 2007 11:27 AM
3

How the fuck was she able to reach into his pants, let alone rip off his testicle and try to eat it? Ripping off a man's testicles is no easy feat. What, did he just stand there and let her rip off his ball? FIGHT BACK, YOU DUMB FUCK.

At least the dumbass won't breed.

Posted by Gomez | June 13, 2007 11:31 AM
4

No shit. Even if she has a kung-fu grip, he should be experiencing enough pain to drop a down, bitch! blow to the face. That's really all it would take. Unless you're dealing with Mann Coulter, I don't see what his problem was.

Posted by Mr. Poe | June 13, 2007 11:33 AM
5

How in the hell do you let someone rip off your damn testicle? The story says she pulled his underpants off, testicle and all. Dear God! What kind of beast-woman was this? I need to buy myself a cup if every pissed off lassy is gonna start going for the gonads.

Posted by michigan clown | June 13, 2007 11:36 AM
6

Jesus fucking christ, could you guys be more of a stereotype?

"Dude got his ass kicked by a chick! What a pussy! Thank god he won't breed!"

Cute. Grow some thumbs, guys.

Posted by Judah | June 13, 2007 11:37 AM
7

I agree that this is a clear case of institutionalized sexism. If the gender roles had been reversed, the man would be in jail for 10+ years for aggravated sexual assault and attempted rape. This is bullshit.

Also, I agree, how did he let her do that? Was he really not paying attention at all? Was he almost passed out?

Posted by NYC dude | June 13, 2007 11:39 AM
8

"This has caused much anguish to me", she says. Ah, Liverpool. The "underpants fell off, and I found myself completely naked" suggest there may have been a few intermediate steps in the assault we're not hearing about.

Posted by Fnarf | June 13, 2007 11:43 AM
9

@6

Okay, explain it then. How the fuck did he let this happen? It's not a matter of ass-kickery. She didn't kick his ass. She fucking ripped out one of his balls.

Did he not want to spill his drink? Did he think she was giving him a rough, unwanted handjob? Does he think? Does he feel? Is he real? Does he like his balls?

Posted by Mr. Poe | June 13, 2007 11:45 AM
10

@9

First of all, acrylic nails are really common in the UK. Second of all, he may not have been able to stop her and he's too embarrassed-- partly because of reactions like yours and Gomez's --to admit what happened.

Talk about blaming the victim.

"It's not rape because she didn't fight back hard enough!"

Posted by Judah | June 13, 2007 11:51 AM
11

Why did I have to read this story while I was eating gizzards? Why?

Posted by elswinger | June 13, 2007 11:58 AM
12

I'm not defending her at all. I wasn't going to waste my time attacking her. Her actions were unreal and completely horrifying, if you ask me. But that's obvious.

If she was kicking his ass, I could understand your side, and like so understand his embarassment. She wasn't. She was ripping out one of his balls.

He acheived maximum embarassment the second Mr. Jones said "That's yours." You can't top that.

Posted by Mr. Poe | June 13, 2007 11:59 AM
13

*embarrassment

Posted by Mr. Poe | June 13, 2007 11:59 AM
14

*achieved

Jesus Christ. Mega apologies for both typos. I am filled with shame. Now I'm embarrassed.

Posted by Mr. Poe | June 13, 2007 12:00 PM
15

JESUS. As a feminist, I would like to say that that's fucking awful and that the assailant should be punished to the fullest extent of the law, yada yada. (On a side note, I can't think of an equivalent attack on a woman- tearing off her labia? Who does that? Oh, wait.)

Posted by Ursula | June 13, 2007 12:00 PM
16

I'm with Judah, that's sexual assault and if the roles had been reversed there wouldn't even be a discussion about it.

Posted by monkey | June 13, 2007 12:25 PM
17

Only 2 1/2 years? For a testicle? She should hve to eat her own uterus for Thanksgiving dinner as part of the sentence.

Posted by Jason Josephes | June 13, 2007 12:28 PM
18

@16

I beg to differ. We would be talking excessively about the situation had a dude ripped out a woman's ovaries.

Posted by Mr. Poe | June 13, 2007 12:32 PM
19

6. Judah would get his balls ripped off in a catfight, and the world would be a better place for it.

Posted by Gomez | June 13, 2007 12:37 PM
20

#19: WTF?

You are sounding an awful lot like an asshole.

Posted by flamingbanjo | June 13, 2007 12:39 PM
21

Judah's right. Quit with the victim blaming. The article is pretty vague. At a minimum, the guy was only wearing his underwear. Perhaps they were starting to get down and he suddenly changed his mind. I'm sure the thought that she might rip off his junk didn't occur to him until it happened.

On the matter of rape, England's laws/courts/judges/juries are seriously fucked up. I guarantee that if Jones had raped Monti, he wouldn't have gotten a tougher sentence, if he was convicted at all.

Posted by keshmeshi | June 13, 2007 12:44 PM
22

@17

They don't have Thanksgiving in the UK.

@19

Hah! That's the lamest fucking insult I've read all day. If you're gonna be a dick the least you can do is front some better material, fuck sake.

Posted by Judah | June 13, 2007 12:46 PM
23

It's for crimes like this that they invented capital punishment.

Posted by Sean | June 13, 2007 2:41 PM
24

All of you are missing the point: exactly how easy is it to physically rip either of a man's testicles off his body, and how painful the whole process probably is for a guy? You realize how much physical compliance from the male that takes? Would YOU let a woman physically rip your balls off?

This story simply is not adding up. Somebody besides the crazy woman fucked up here.

Posted by Gomez | June 13, 2007 3:46 PM
25

All of you are missing the point: exactly how easy is it to physically rip either of a man's testicles off his body, and how painful the whole process probably is for a guy? You realize how much physical compliance from the male that takes? Would YOU let a woman physically rip your balls off?

This story simply is not adding up. Somebody besides the crazy woman fucked up here.

Posted by Gomez | June 13, 2007 3:46 PM
26

Also, the point of 19 is that Judah is an obvious troll, and anyone who pays him any real mind is giving him way too much credit.

Posted by Gomez | June 13, 2007 3:48 PM
27
Also, the point of 19 is that Judah is an obvious troll, and anyone who pays him any real mind is giving him way too much credit.

I believe that's what Freud would call projection.

You realize how much physical compliance from the male that takes?

No, you're missing the point: he may not have been able to stop her, even if he was fighting. It's pretty hard to shove a bottle up someone's ass, but if some guy knocked you down and did that to you the assumption would be that you couldn't stop him. But you don't apply that assumption to this case because the attacker was a woman, and that's where you're allowing unfounded prejudice to shape your perception. She could have done this to him-- and evidently did --totally against his will.

Posted by Judah | June 13, 2007 4:02 PM
28

It's not that hard to shove a bottle up someone's ass. Take a look.

http://www.schussman.com/images/55.jpg

Posted by Gurldoggie | June 13, 2007 4:47 PM
29

remember, this is the UK: its likely that both parties were shit faced blacked out drunk. she can't REMEMBER tearing off his nut & trying to eat it.

Posted by maxsolomon | June 13, 2007 5:03 PM
30

But you can't tear OFF a nut; it's not ON the body, it's IN the body. It's in a sack, which means you'd have to rip a hole in the sack, which would be a whole different kind of pain that your usual nut damage. And then you'd have to get the nut out the hole, and there's all those tubes and stuff. I don't know how firmly connected those are, and I don't want to find out, but it does seem like a fairly difficult thing to accomplish -- certainly a simple hard yank wouldn't be enough.

Posted by Fnarf | June 13, 2007 5:34 PM
31

I'm with Fnarf? How to you rip off a nut with your bare hands? Seriously? This story has holes.

Posted by hunh? | June 13, 2007 8:26 PM
32

I said before: big acrylic nails are common in the UK. She probably just dug them in and pulled. Shredded the nut sack and squeezed his business out like the inside of a grape.

Posted by Judah | June 13, 2007 8:30 PM
33

it's possible that the guy is very little is she is very big. why assume that a man is bigger physically than a woman.
i am not a particularly big girl but i can tell you, in my household, i am the one who opens pickle jars, not my fiancÚ.
also... if pcp or some drug like that was involved, that could explain the iron grip.

Posted by Some girl | June 13, 2007 11:53 PM

Comments Closed

In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 45 days old).