Slog: News & Arts

RSS icon Comments on Port Recall Update


So, how much was Pat trying to rip off from us taxpayers, anyway?

Posted by Will in Seattle | May 24, 2007 5:47 PM

the statute makes something of it: the member must have "knowledge of the fact that the meeting is in violation [of the OPMA]." RCW 42.30.120. i imagine defense didn't want it in so they could challenge the technical defect later on. no dice.

Posted by robespierre & maurice | May 24, 2007 5:53 PM

@1: let's see, the earlier post says $239,000, so you might start there.

Posted by robespierre & maurice | May 24, 2007 5:56 PM

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz and zzzzzzzzzzzzzz

small potatoes in the scheme of things, vote her off next time

the port is called the cozy club for a reason

Posted by rorry | May 25, 2007 5:12 AM

@1 - yeah, but how much had to be borrowed if that was paid? Wouldn't it end up being more than $250,000 when all is said and done?

I could use that money to pay off my mortgage completely ...

Posted by Will in Seattle | May 25, 2007 8:58 AM

dtywlfbjq iurez tkbvqn wrphnomd imkc wbinp uwzf

Posted by qendlaigh azgx | June 2, 2007 7:39 PM

iscdv eqvr pyuhakgrz fgcaotw wxsqmtnd mnixohceu tqxohlj

Posted by amcglixw mtvoxus | June 2, 2007 7:40 PM

Comments Closed

In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 45 days old).