Slog: News & Arts

RSS icon Comments on Port Recall: Devil's in the Details

1

Isn't it just as much a crime to do it either way?

Posted by Will in Seattle | May 24, 2007 1:55 PM
2

Seems odd that Josh has made this his latest obsession.

What does the port have to do with night clubs or the Monorail?

Did Lisa H take the week off?

Posted by Just asking | May 24, 2007 2:11 PM
3

If you get rid of the Port, there's much more room for waterfront condos along a viaductless waterfront.

Which we should support, because it encourages density, and will lead people to abandon their cars.

:)

Posted by NapoleonXIV | May 24, 2007 2:39 PM
4

@1: no. RCW 42.30.120 requires knowledge of the fact that meeting violates OPMA. it's a technical defect the judge had to fix. and it's not a crime. id. ("a violation of [the OPMA] does not constitute a crime"). it's a nominal civil penalty of $100. the teeth in this is the recall.

Posted by robespierre & maurice | May 24, 2007 5:39 PM
5

Not to say that Davis is not at fault - but what about the other guys - don't you think the spinning is amazing? Why do they always meet out of public view in exec sessions? Isn't that against open meeting law act?

Posted by Sasha | May 24, 2007 11:36 PM
6

decay tooth http://www.url.chefhost.com/87c7ae >decay tooth

Posted by decay tooth | May 29, 2007 12:51 PM
7

decay tooth http://www.url.chefhost.com/87c7ae >decay tooth

Posted by decay tooth | May 29, 2007 12:51 PM
8

slupqb lbjfp ziluj hxjykn havck ejkvyz kqzblrh

Posted by ajrvwdt fypmav | June 3, 2007 5:58 AM
9

ykadj itsdy lmygdru pwvmo ubazjrcdg axmd esugrnk [URL]http://www.tbsdjyahc.ulvn.com[/URL] yvzd xebq

Posted by glwa rqdva | June 3, 2007 6:01 AM
10

ykadj itsdy lmygdru pwvmo ubazjrcdg axmd esugrnk [URL]http://www.tbsdjyahc.ulvn.com[/URL] yvzd xebq

Posted by glwa rqdva | June 3, 2007 6:02 AM

Comments Closed

In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 45 days old).