Slog: News & Arts

RSS icon Comments on More Fun with Phonetics

1

I figured there was some sort of disconnect between that site's description and the IPA and the transliteration. I was inclined in the beginning to opt for the voiceless lateral fricative sound, and because of my love of Nahuatl, I should've trusted that instinct. The funny thing about IPA is that it looks and usually is really authoratative, but it's really only as good as its transcriber's knowledge of the symbols and sounds.

Posted by Nick | May 7, 2007 4:27 PM
2

Oh, but I still do not agree with the "Sealth" transliteration, since almost without question does the "t"-seeming sound occur before the lateral sound. In fact, it is nearly impossible to have a lateral sound without there being some portion of the center of the tongue's making contact behind the teeth. And since "th" has its own value as a phoneme (and not usually indicating a t and then an ejective), I find it confusing and useless in transliteration. "SEATTLE" still does the job better; it's just that most people, when saying it, voice the L and don't know to eject at the end.

Posted by Nick | May 7, 2007 4:32 PM
3

I AM THE ONLY PERSON WHO CARES ABOUT THIS. THIS IS SO EMBARRASSEEN.

Posted by Nick | May 7, 2007 4:33 PM
4

Maybe not the only person who cares, but the only person who feels a need to add to the discussion. I don't know enough about the topic to think beyond 'that's interesting'. I read it, and thought about it, but have nothing to add to the conversation.

Posted by Enigma | May 7, 2007 4:41 PM
5

Sealh.
Seal'h.
Seatl'.
Seahlh.

Any of these is better.

Posted by Nick | May 7, 2007 4:42 PM
6

Just insert them and let the system provide the appropriate font fallback like this: U+026B (ɫ), U+026C (ɬ). As long as the system provides a system font with IPA extensions (U+0250 through U+02AF) and a fallback mechanism it should work.

Posted by re:spect | May 7, 2007 5:03 PM
7

Chief Seattle's name is written in Lushootseed on the history marker in Pioneer Square (a saying of his is on one side in English, on the other in Lushootseed). That transcription uses a barred lambda for the affricated voicless lateral in question here.

Incidentally, the voiceless lateral sound occurs in Welsh, spelled "ll" in words like "Lloyd" etc.

Posted by ebsur | May 7, 2007 5:59 PM
8

That's the reason for the confusion ebsur.

The 'barred lambda' is the Lushootseed spelling for the sound we're talking about. The belted l is the IPA symbol for this sound. (U+026C)

People have been confusing the Lushootseed letter with the (similar-looking) IPA letter with the wavy line (U+026B above).

The sound that the Lushootseed linguist describes is definitely the belted l.

BTW re:spect, your characters show up as empty boxes on my screen so I guess it isn't that easy.

Posted by will | May 7, 2007 6:33 PM
9

Finally. True clarity. I hadn't thought about the confusion being found in similar symbols shared between IPA and a transliteration. I think Will has solved it. Thanks, man!

Posted by Nick | May 7, 2007 6:44 PM
10

Err, the "barred lambda" is IPA, isn't it? Or is it just used by Americanists? ... Okay, after checking my IPA chart, I guess it's just used by Americanists, but it's the symbol for a lateral affricate (widely used by linguists working on American Indian lgs, not just in the Lushootseed orthography) (in IPA would be t + lateral fricative). As an affricate that explains the glottalization (there are languages with glottalized fricatives but it's rare). From what I gather from these discussions, back then his name ended with a glottalized lateral affricate, but modern Lushootseed has apparently lost the affricate (but still has the lateral fricative). Glottalized lateral affricates are very commonly found in the NW sprachbund and throughout the Salish language family. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salishan_languages

Posted by rtw | May 7, 2007 9:42 PM
11

Or! Only the pronunciation of Chief Seattle's name - not the language as a whole - lost the affricate and is now pronounced with a fricative. After rereading what the History Link article said it's not clear whether it applies to the language or the word. And I have phoneme charts for Interior Salish languages but not Coast Salish and can't check.

And no, Nick, you're not the only one interested. I, btw, am procrastinating writing a paper on an Interior Salish language right now that's due tomorrow afternoon and I really need to get off the stupid internet.

Posted by rtw | May 7, 2007 9:51 PM
12

rtw : "...it's the symbol for a lateral affricate (widely used by linguists working on American Indian lgs, not just in the Lushootseed orthography)"

Duh...where would the Lushootseed orthography come from if not linguists working on the language? They may have had their own writing system that we don't know of today, but they certainly didn't devise a system on their own that shared 90% of our alphabet!!

Anyway, I wasn't claiming that the 'barred l' was only Lushootseed, just that it was not IPA for a lateral fricative.

Posted by will | May 8, 2007 8:03 AM
13

wow-there are a lot of really smart people in the world. can you please use some of your smartness to do something meaningful?

Posted by sarcaficous | May 8, 2007 9:41 AM
14

...about *your* situation?

Posted by Lloyd Clydesdale | May 8, 2007 9:43 AM
15

Will @12: barred l is IPA for lateral fricative. I think you meant barred lambda, though, which isn't IPA for lateral affricate (because IPA analyzes affricates as stop + fricative and not as single phonemes), but I was trying to say that it's widely used by linguists anyway. IPA is great in theory but isn't used universally; linguists adapt it to their needs depending on the languages they're working on and the tradition of the area.

So the chief's name ended with a glottalized affricate; these days it would be pronounced with a fricative; the History Link article uses the symbol for a velarized l instead of a barred l. "Duh"?... Okay.

@13: Language documentation and revitalization are meaningful.

Posted by rtw | May 8, 2007 11:38 AM
16

Aah..I thought we were just writing 'lambda' to mean 'l' because an 'l' by itself is so hard to distinguish from capital 'eye', lowercase 'el', and so forth. That was my impression from the NW History Link article too since it says 'barred lambda' and then puts the velarized 'el' in the transcription.

Either way, barred 'l' ain't a lateral fricative, 'belted l' is as the person who wrote the post points out. These word games point out the whole problem though--what does 'barred' mean when the two options are 'belted' or with a tilde thru the middle? I took 'barred' to mean the latter, you took it to mean the first.

As for 'barred lambda', he and I have never met. I don't have a clue who he is or what sound he represents.

I agree with you wholeheartedly on your response to (13).

Posted by will | May 8, 2007 1:02 PM
17

Gotcha. Ha, so illustrative of how misunderstandings happen. Here's a barred lambda: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Barred_lambda.svg. And I refer to a lateral fricative as 'barred el', yeah. I've been trying to find a Salish phoneme chart using the Americanist system to link to online but can't. Oh well. Linguistics is fascinating and things aren't as simple as they first appear - even with the IPA, which is supposed facilitate communication and make transcription easy. Salish languages are wonderful and complex and I hope the revitalization efforts that are underway these days are successful.

Posted by rtw | May 8, 2007 3:50 PM
18

Err, okay, the link didn't work, but it's the symbol at the bottom of the Wikipedia entry on Lushootseed: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lushootseed (below 'external links'). You can click on the image and it'll supersize it - that's the link I was trying to give.

Posted by rtw | May 8, 2007 3:53 PM
19

Hello everyone, wanna be part of some kind of community, possible here? anyone here?

Posted by Buy antivirus online | May 10, 2007 2:09 PM
20

MSN I NIIPET
MSN

Posted by Bill | May 12, 2007 7:10 PM
21

MSN I NIIPET
MSN

Posted by Bill | May 12, 2007 7:10 PM
22

MSN I NIIPET
MSN

Posted by Bill | May 12, 2007 7:11 PM

Comments Closed

In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 45 days old).